User talk:V105memorial
I reverted edits you made to another editor's user page. If you would like to communicate with him, please put those comments on his talk page and sign them. Any questions, feel free to use my talk page or reply here, whichever is easier. Jonathunder 02:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I screwed up on that one... V105memorial 18:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)V105memorial
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Have a look at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons too. Tom Harrison Talk 16:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Too smug... V105memorial 17:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)v105memorial
- Thanks for fixing the references [1]. I'm not allowed to do that conversion. (SEWilco 05:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC))
Hi; I posted this on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard:
I think this[2] linking of Criticism of the Council on American-Islamic Relations with the title secret ties to Hamas is done in order to have secret ties to Hamas prominently displayed on the page and associated with Ellison, who is running for office. I regard this as disruptive, and a violation of our policy on biographies of living people. I intend to revert, and lock the page or block the user as needed. If anyone thinks I'm wrong, please let me know.
Tom Harrison Talk 01:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tom, you are incorrect. It makes more sense to link from that because the phrase is more applicable when discussing controversies. Prominence never crossed my mind. Secret ties to Hamas IS one of the controversies, Tammy Lee's accusations are not, and for that reason I am reverting your edit again.
- By the way, the way you throw around wikipolicy is arrogant and unnecessary. I have read the policies and I think you need to get a hobby other that Wikipedia. Thanks. V105memorial 01:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)v105memorial
You have made an edit that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page. If you restore this material to the article or its talk page once more, you will be blocked for disruption. See Blocking policy: Biographies of living people. Tom Harrison Talk 21:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Attacks on "Tom Harrison"
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. yandman 13:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mark Rosen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Pan Dan 22:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Aaron Rodgers
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aaron Rodgers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:11, 21 July 2014 (UTC)