Jump to content

User talk:Ultan42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ultan42 (talk | contribs) at 21:04, 28 July 2014 (Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Ultan42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Smartse (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The Great Binge

Hi -- You wrote on my talk page about the deletion of this article & then deleted it. If you're still interested, The Great Binge was deleted because the only source that could be found was an episode of the show QI, which is not considered a reliable source. Phil Bridger sums it up well: "This article is pure original research, and a Google Books search shows that many historical periods have been called "the great binge", most of them referring to economics (an excess of spending and speculation) rather than to consumption of alcohol and other drugs." I performed a quick websearch before deleting which confirmed that there appears no online evidence of the term being widely used in the sense of the article (overconsumption of drugs etc). Hope this helps! If you wish to contest deletion, let me know and I'll restore it and take it to Articles for deletion for community discussion. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anonymous Project Mayhem 2012 Codename:Tyler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

you should just delete it,

Hi, Ultan42 - I have deleted your AFC as you requested, but you should feel free to recreate it with sources at any time. Wikipedia:Your first article might be useful. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 20:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ultan42. You have new messages at Hasteur's talk page.
Message added 20:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hasteur (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Ultan42, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Also WP:NEWBIE is a great place to get advice. Hasteur (talk) 21:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ultan42. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Anne Delong (talk) 01:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hi, I saw your question at the Teahouse and added a few things to Judith Chomsky. There was a great profile in the Philadelphia Weekly, so if you want to improve it more maybe you could look at that and add some of that material. Also I noticed that a couple of sentences had been copied from the ASHA profile. It might be a good idea to rewrite those in your own words, to avoid copyright issues. And it seems we need a better cite for her birth date. One place to look might be if she is a member of any professional organizations. Sometimes they include the birth date in an announcement when the person joins. Anyway, thanks for creating this article, and good luck! -- Margin1522 (talk) 17:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention why the notice about "primary sources" was there. You can click the "primary sources" in that notice to see the kind of sources that Wikipedia likes -- generally information written by third parties (scholars, reporters, etc.) in books, newspapers, and magazines. The problem here is the legal documents, like "Civil Action No...." Did you find about those documents in an article? Then you should cite the article, and explain who the people are and what those cases were about. If you want to keep the document numbers, where can another editor go to view those documents and verify that what you say about them is true? Hope that helps. -- Margin1522 (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a million that is a real help! That article is perfect, I'll try to improve the entry with it. What exactly is the story with images? All the good articles have them, mine looks a little crap without one! I know they have to be in the public domain but Im not totally sure how to check if one is! I tried to upload one from the Chomsky foundation website but wikipedia required a proof of it being public domain and I didn't have that so I emailed the foundation requesting one but got no response yet. Is there a search for just public domain images I can do or something? Thanks again!