User talk:89.100.215.70

November 2013

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Richard Dawkins because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Richard Dawkins. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 18:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Richard Dawkins. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your opinion is not a source. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Richard Dawkins shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:16, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Dawkins, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

Hello, 89.100.215.70. You have new messages at NeilN's talk page.
Message added 18:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arthur Fremantle has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arthur Fremantle was changed by 89.100.215.70 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893091 on 2014-06-02T23:35:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:35, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 1948 Palestinian exodus. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---