User talk:Godwhacker

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Godwhacker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

block is excessive

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=block is excessive |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=block is excessive |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=block is excessive |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I've reduced the block to 24 hours with NSLE's agreement. Please come back tomorrow and contribute constructively instead of vandalising. Wikipedia:Community Portal is a good starting point. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me a chance. That's all a bloke can ask for. --Godwhacker 05:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me