Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)
Lost Luggage (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 16, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the 1982 Atari 2600 game Lost Luggage features terrorist suitcases? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lost Luggage (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I'll review. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
I love that there was no room on the cartridge for a luggage train! Skycap is unfamiliar. Even though there's a wikilink, would it be appropriate to say "skycap porter" or something? Otherwise, everything reads beautifully, there's nothing that needs tweaking. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Went with skycap porter. Thanks for looking over the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:05, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
We're now at 55 GAs in the 1980s video games category! I have to say, this was one of the cleanest, GA-ready articles I've had the pleasure of reviewing. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Im not sure quite what to say. Is this being a featured artivle intended as some kind of joke? Whilst well written and technically acceptable it is, to put mildly, not of much interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.120.173 (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Well they can't all be winners. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:13, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Featured articles are chosen purely for how well they cover their topic, not for how interesting the topic is. It is a bit weird to see such random stuff featured though. --74.128.224.174 (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2015 (UTC)