Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lerner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William Lerner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (people). Of the three listed sources, the first mentions him tangentially and the other two are not reliable sources. Pink Bull 18:08, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It may not be a bad idea to include information about subject in yet to be created article about company where subject is CEO, assuming of course company meets notability criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).--Pink Bull 18:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Sources & new page - Thank you for your feedback. I will remove the second source that provides information about William Lerner's charity, Billy4Kids. From your experience do you consider the third source not usable? Please let me know. Also, are you suggesting a page for iPark, the company that the subject is CEO of, be created. There are tangible sources to do so. Thank so very much. Biancamariecar (talk)

Does the New York Resident Magazine have a "a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" as per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources? I suggested creating an article about the corporation because I assume it can easier meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) than this subject can meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (people) because the former has been in business for more than 50 years. --Pink Bull 15:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will confirm "New York Resident Magazine." I will also create a corporate business page with all available a creditable sources. Thank you very much. Biancamariecar (talk)

New Article Created As Per Suggestion

Hello. As you suggested, I was able to create a Wikipedia article for iPark. Because this is created will the article titled, "William Lerner" be deleted? What will happen next? Please let me know. And thank you again for your help. Biancamariecar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Other editors will eventually join this discussion to determine whether the article under discussion should be kept, merged, or deleted.--Pink Bull 16:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. User:Biancamariecar is referring to iPark, which was recently created.--Pink Bull 16:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.