Talk:List of frivolous political parties

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 27 July 2007, see discussion.
No consensus, 11 December 2006, see discussion.

Archives

Archive 1 (2005-2012)

Yippies

I added the yippies, they're a little different than the other parties, but they should still count. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.193.131.57 (talk) 21:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poland

Civic platform is the biggest and currently governing party of Poland, Prime Minister is its member. It has nothing to do with political satire. Why it is mentioned here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.153.101 (talk) 15:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unreferenced Items

Please do not add items to this list without references to reliable sources. This is a violation of the main wikipedia policies, WP:V, WP:CITE. -No.Altenmann >t 02:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Second warning: if you continue violate English wikipedia policy by adding unreferenced information, you may be blocked from editing. -No.Altenmann >t 06:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These frivolous political parties are , in fact, existence, and stood in some national election. In Japanese Wikipedia Page, I think that it could be the reference information. --Mtcedar (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you have referencs, please add them.Otherwise the text will be deleted according to wikipedia policies. I can invent some funny names myself and claim that Bwana Mzimu Kubwa was a tonga-in-cheek party in Zamunda. I see your account exists since 2005. Time to learn that links to other wikipedia articles are not valid references in English wikipedia. -No.Altenmann >t 15:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Natural Law Party

I'm removing them. They may have been nutters, but they were not a lampoon or satire party. SigPig |^{SEND - OVER} 14:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]