Jump to content

Wikipedia:Questia

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ca$e (talk | contribs) at 08:08, 15 August 2014 (→Apply or renew). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Wikipedia Library

Questia Online Library
Sign up for free access access to Questia's online resources
(accounts available)

QThis user used to have access to Questia through The Wikipedia Library.


Account Coordinator: ChrisGualtieri will be approving accounts and collecting email addresses.

Wikipedia:Questia/Nav Questia is an online research library for books and journal articles focusing on the humanities and social sciences. Questia has curated titles from over 300 trusted publishers, including 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, and newspaper articles, as well as encyclopedia entries. Paid access to Questia costs $99 per year.

As of August 2012 Questia has generously agreed to give free, full-access 1-year accounts for 2000 Wikipedia editors to use, distributed at the discretion of the community. Editors will need a 1-year-old account and 1000 edits in order to qualify. At the end of 1 year, editors who found the resource useful can simply re-apply.

Requirements

  • You do not have free online access to these Questia products through your local library or university
  • You have your preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia; (see Special:Preferences)
  • You have an account that is a minimum of 1 year old
  • You have a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia
  • You are active in content generation, research, and/or verification work

Expectations

Approved editors may
  • Search, view, retrieve, and display portions of restricted content
  • Electronically save portions of restricted content
  • Print out single copies of portions of restricted content
  • Comply with any terms and conditions which appear on the particular pages of the Questia website they are accessing
Approved editors will not
  • Share their account logins or passwords with others
  • Mass scrape or mass download Questia content
  • Systematically make printed or electronic copies of multiple extracts of restricted content available for any purpose
  • Datamine metadata without permission, in order, for instance, to use metadata for auto-created stub articles
  • Use the access provided through the Pilot for any commercial purpose
Private and confidential information
  • You will need to have a confirmed email address to participate. You understand and agree that your name and email address may be shared with representatives of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia Library, and Questia Online Library. While representatives of the Wikipedia Library are volunteers (not employees or contractors of the Wikimedia Foundation or Questia Online Library), they have signed confidentiality agreements with the Wikimedia Foundation with regards to the personal information they may handle for the Wikipedia Library.

Citation

  • Editors should always provide original citation information, in addition to linking a Questia article, per WP:V and WP:SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT
  • Editors should not provide bare links to non-free Questia pages
  • Editors should note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
Examples
<ref>{{cite web|title=National implementation committee approves funds for Swami Vivekananda values' education project|url=http://www.questia.com/doc/1P3-2131107461.html#|publisher=US Fed News Service, Including US State News |accessdate=14 April 2012|date=September 2010|subscription=yes|via=[[Questia]]}}</ref>
  • "National implementation committee approves funds for Swami Vivekananda values' education project". US Fed News Service, Including US State News. September 2010. Retrieved 14 April 2012 – via Questia. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)

If citing a book, optionally adding the ISBN of the cited book (found inside the Questia book, on its copyright page) increases both accessibility and verifiability for those without Questia access, who may then use the automatically-generated ISBN hyperlink. ISBNs can be included in many citation templates (including cite web), by means of the |isbn= parameter. Alternatively, as in the example below, immediately after (outside) the citation and Questia reference templates, simply type the acronym ISBN (with no punctuation) followed by one space and then the 13-digit (preferred) or 10-digit ISBN. WP:ISBN

<ref>{{cite book|last1=Morris|first1=Christopher|title=The Big Muddy: An Environmental History of the Mississippi and Its Peoples, from Hernando De Soto to Hurricane Katrina|year=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=New York|pages=70, 74|url=http://www.questia.com/read/121547188|accessdate=12 July 2014|subscription=yes|via=[[Questia]]|isbn= 978-0195316919}}

Apply or renew

  1. Add your username at the bottom. Tell us what areas you're active in and how you'll use the Questia resources. If you had an account, it expires after one year, so please reapply.
  2. Bddmagic (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005 with about 2400 edits. Active in Social work, Magic, Video Games, Texas stuff and Social sciences. --Bddmagic (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  3. HueSatLum (talk · contribs) I already have access to HighBeam through TWL, but I believe Questia would give me access to an entirely different range of sources. I write articles on many different topics—basically anything that interests me—and have accumulated almost two years of activity and over 6,000 edits. ~HueSatLum 02:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  4. Mayooranathan (talk · contribs) - Editor in Tamil Wikipedia since 2000 with more than 28,000 edits and started about 3,800 new articles. Active in Architecture, Linguistics, Culture, Biographies etc. Mayooranathan (talk) 11:21, 29 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  5. CasualObserver'48 (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2007 with about 6700 edits. Active in areas of MidEast, I/P, early US history and development of water resource infrastructure. CasualObserver'48 (talk) 10:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  6. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - Active since February 5, 2011 with 39,633 live edits, 83% in article space. I have written about visual arts, biographies, history, prehistory articles for Colorado, the US, UK, Asia and other places. I have created new articles and spend a considerable amount of time making un/undersourced articles into better quality articles.--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  7. Walter Grassroot (talk · contribs) - [1] Editor since 2008 with over 50000 edits, most contributions are in Chinese (zh-wikipedia). I also wrote 2FA, 1FL, 10GA, and 95+DYK, as well as created over 12000 articles in Zh-wikipedia. Hope I am qualified with this application. Thank you. --Walter Grassroot |talk 02:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  8. Strike Eagle (talk · contribs) Have more than 9300 edits, 5 GAs and 8 DYKs...I would like to have archives of journals that would really help my articles. I am autopatrolled and have rollback and reviewing privileges. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 15:44, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
  9. Jeremy112233 (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since January 2012 with nearly 18,000 edits. Most of my attention is focused on content generation. All of my reference use full citation information, which helps users to verify the information I add to the encyclopedia even if they do not have access to the pay-site's articles. Most of my articles require a large amount of research as they deal with contemporary issues where the sources I need are often behind paywalls rather than available freely on Google's reference searches like Scholar or News. That said, they just changed the Google News search so the old Archive function is no longer available, providing even less good sources to create articles. My articles are largely on law, medical, or entertainment related people or firms, and Highbeam would make my articles better researched, and allow me to create articles on subjects I may otherwise not be able to. I do not currently have ready access to Questia through either a university or a library; I did a few years ago and found it extremely helpful.Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
  10. I have been on the site for many years and have thousands of edits. Many of my contributions are to creating and expanding history articles. I've taken a long break from Wikipedia but looking to restart. Gettingtoit (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)  Not done - No email set up.[reply]
  11. Rhododendrites (talk · contribs) - About 8500 edits since 2007. A good amount of experience improving articles, adding references, checking references, etc. in a wide range of subject areas. I'm an active Wikipedian as well as a grad student in an interdisciplinary humanities/social sciences program, so a lot of my article activity is in my areas of study (knowledge production, media studies, internet activism, reference works, etc.). Thanks! --— Rhododendrites  Donetalk |  03:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:ColonelHenry. As of March 2014, almost 17,000 edits, several FAs and GAs (listed on my userpage), I generally focus on content creation and improvement especially towards articles on poetry, literature, historical biographies, regional history and historical places/landmarks, looking to expand my work into theology and botany. Would be glad to help other editors looking for resources as well.--ColonelHenry (talk) 07:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  13. TransporterMan (talk · contribs). About 15,300 edits since 2007. I do dispute resolution and am the second most active volunteer at 3O, the most active at DRN, and a member of the Mediation Committee. Access to sources is useful in sorting out content disputes. — TransporterMan (TALK) 17:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  14. Dezastru (talk · contribs). English-language Wikipedia editor since January 2012, with 3,000+ edits. Most of my contributions involve American history, politics and current events, and biographies. Dezastru (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  15. SciGal (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2009 with 1,080 edits. Active in WikiProjects TV and WikiProjects Florida. SciGal (talk) 20:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  16. Frank Schulenburg. Editor since 2005 with more than 39,000 edits across languages and projects. Wrote 17 featured articles so far and a number of good articles. I'm mostly active on the German Wikipedia, but I'm doing my research in French, English, and German. Most of my featured work was on biographies (17th and 18th century). I agree to the conditions above. Thanks in advance, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  17. Dumelow (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2006 with 17,000 edits. Active in content creation primarily in engineering and military history - Dumelow (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  18. Dank. 60k edits. I'm working on copyediting software that would benefit from the resources at [2]. - Dank (push to talk) 16:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  19. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. 60K edits. Use for content verification, especially BLPs, and for creating/expanding articles about 1940-70s genre fiction, which has become much more difficult with the unavailability of the Google News archive functions (not that it was easy even with them.) Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  20. User:Kmhkmh around 8800 edits in en.wp and around 33000 edits inen.wp since 2007. I could use tge account primarily for the verification and extension of existing articles, but possibly also for the occasional new one.--Kmhkmh (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  21. User:Carriearchdale I have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and currently have over 2700 edits globally over all the wikis. I am interested in having access to Questia to help in my work to expand and verify articles in several different interest areas including biographies, linguistics, literature, classic antiquity studies, the arts, and education. I am interested in having access to [3]. I do not have access through local libraries since I live in a quite rural type setting. Thank you for you consideration. Carriearchdale (talk) 20:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  22. User:Glane23 I have edited Wikipedia since 2008 and have made over 46,000 edits. I now work mostly on adding/improving references for articles across en:Wikipedia and can use a resource such as Questia for its sources in periodicals. Geoff Who, me? 21:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  23. Justlettersandnumbers. Principal areas of interest include Renaissance topics, art history and music theory. Access would be seriously useful for content creation in those areas, and also for improving the overall standard of referencing in the encyclopaedia. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  24. User:Pete unseth I have edited English Wikipedia since 2007 (plus a few edits in other languages, mostly adding image files). I have created about 35 articles, but edited hundreds. My principal areas of editing are Ethiopian topics, proverbs, linguistics, Bible translations, sociolinguistics, and literature, but I have edited a wide variety of topics. My most common contributions seem to be adding references to support statements and to make wikilinks.  Done
  25. Lightbreather Active in articles related to gun laws and gun violence prevention; biographies of living persons. Lightbreather (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  26. magiciandude Editor since 2004. Main focus is on Latin music. Erick (talk) 23:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  27. srich32977 Posted a {{Labutnum III}} on my userpage. Interested in economics, military history, and politics (to a limited extent). – S. Rich (talk) 01:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  28. User:Anita5192. I correct, enhance, document and sometimes create mathematics articles. I will use the Questia resources as references to verify undocumented principles. – Anita5192 (talk) 02:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  29. DendroNaja I have been a member for over a year, have well over 1400 edits, have promoted at least 5 or 6 articles to GA status, I am mainly interested in venomous snakes, snake venom, toxinology, psychology and pharmacology. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 04:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC) -  Not done Blocked user.[reply]
  30. Patafisik (talk · contribs) 5 years of contribution mainly in it.wiki and commons, now also in fr.wiki: expanding and creating articles about architecture, literature, monuments, nature reserves, museums and art (GLAM topics). Interested also in multimedia, semiotic studies and communication studies. 40,000+ edits. Thanks.--Patafisik (talk) 10:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  31. Shakehandsman (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006 with over 11,000 edits. Working on Wikiproject British Crime articles including creating a good article almost single handedly. Also work on politics, biographies, and football. I often add refs for unreferenced material. I intend to use Questia to continue the same work into the future.--Shakehandsman (talk) 14:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  32. Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 30,000+ edits. I edit in many diverse areas, including on various different historical topics (particularly biographies of 18th, 19th, and 20th century noblewomen). This would be my first access to Questia; I've heard nothing but good things about the different resources the site can provide. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Ruby 2010/2013 23:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  33. Ordensherre (talk · contribs). Editor on Wikipedia in Norwegian bokmål/riksmål (nowi) since 2008. Active writing and verifying articles on nowi. Patroller. Total new articles started on nowi: 2184. Total contributions to nowi: 71000+. Would appreciate access to online resources I do not otherwise have access to. Ordensherre (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  34. Demostene119 (talk · contribs) Active on It-wipedia since 2006 mainly expanding and creating new articles on science, modern history and literature. Featured content author, +9,000 edits. Thanks.--Demostene119 (talk) 16:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  35. HelicopterLlama (talk · contribs) I've been a member for over a year, just passed 4,000 edits. Generally new page patrol, but interests in topics related to music, literature, general humanities stuff, though I would highly appreciate the access to be able to contribute more to historical topics relating to my interests and for verification of biographies, thanks, cheers! ~Helicopter Llama~ 20:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  36. BlackCab (talk · contribs) Almost 9000 edits since 2007, focusing primarily on articles relating to Jehovah's Witnesses, New Zealand colonial history and contemporary music. Questia resources would be invaluable to access research in academic papers on sociological study of high-control religions such as Jehovah's Witnesses. BlackCab (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  37. Carlstak (talk · contribs) I've made over 6,000 edits since August 2011 and have created about 15 articles, including some quite long ones, on historical subjects and biographies. I am especially interested in Spanish subjects, and in translating articles from the Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese Wikipedias. I also spend much time adding quality sources to articles. Questia resources would be very useful to my research. Carlstak (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  38. WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC) Wikipedian since 2010. I will use the Questia resources to edit articles about genetics, psychology, and the history of those topics, and also more generally to update and expand bibliographies that I keep in user space to share with other Wikipedians.  Done[reply]
  39. Neonorange (talk · contribs) I've been an active user over the past year, and have begun to add content to articles in three areas: American novelists, the American Civil Rights Movement, and the American anti-war movement. I have paid access to The New York Times, The Economist, and Foreign Affairs. Better access to research materials would greatly strengthen my ability to contribute well cited Wikipedia content. I worked as a journalist and documentarist for many years. I no longer have access to a broad range of research tools. Though I live in a major metropolitan area, my local library is very small, and I have no access to academic libraries. I've worked in more than 35 US states and more than 35 countries and territories. With proper research material, through Questia, I can make use of my personal experiences to locate WP:RS to back up contributions to Wikipedia. - Neonorange (talk) 15:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  40. User:Aditya Kabir I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, and have made over 18,000 edits. The biggest problem I face is a lack of access to quality sources.  Done
  41. FireflySixtySeven (talk · contribs) I am active in content creation; having access to more sources would be very useful when I write/translate articles. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC) -  Not done Does not meet and alts are hidden.[reply]
  42. User:CorinneSD Since I started editing on Wikipedia in September 2012, I have made over 5,000 edits. I have an M.A. and taught English as a Second Language for 27 years before retiring. I read on a wide range of topics, and as I read I find and correct errors. When I come across something that is confusing or contradictory, I consult other editors with expertise in that area, but I would like to be able to check the literature myself. I would be glad to add citations to unsourced material. I do not have access to any on-line library and would be very happy to be able to access material on-line. CorinneSD (talk) 23:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  43. Zanhe (talk · contribs) I've made 25,000+ edits, mostly creating new content, including 400+ new articles, 100+ DYK credits, and 4 GAs. I'm mainly interested in Chinese and East Asian history, politics, art, and archaeology. Having access to Questia would help me find sources for academic subjects. -Zanhe (talk) 02:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  44. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) I have made over 25k edits in two and a half years on en WP, and have contributed to quite a bit of Featured content. I work in WWII Yugoslavia topics and there are a lot of resources accessible through Questia that would make a big difference to the breadth of sources I could use to develop articles. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  45. Ferbr1 (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC) I have over 30,000 edits. I have made at least 300 articles.  Done[reply]
  46. SPECIFICO (talk · contribs) I will use this access primarily to improve content and reference citations in articles concerning and relating to economics. SPECIFICO talk 13:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ryoga Godai (talk · contribs) I've been editing since 2010, mainly music, anime, and film articles. Questia can really me help a lot in expanding the related articles. ごだい (会話) 04:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  48. Philkon (talk · contribs) I have done lots of edits, but do not know exactly how many or where to find that information. My area of special work is in American Indian history having written books on this subject. I also work in space exploration. Access to this resource could be quite helpful. Phil Konstantin (talk) 12:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  49. Blarcrean (talk · contribs) I have been a contributor to Wikipedia since 2009 with a modest 2300+edits to my name as well as original articles mainly on Southern African humanities-related subjects - believing that Questia access would prove invaluable to improving materials available in Wikipedia for a relatively neglected part of the world.  Done
  50. Ssilvers (talk · contribs) - Since 2006 I have created hundreds, and edited thousands of pages on Wikipedia, especially about musical theatre and comic opera, but also about the environment, the Victorian era and a variety of other topics; I come across Questia articles in my searches and would like to be able to access them. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  51. Hmlarson (talk · contribs) - I've been most active on articles related to women's history and sports in the last few years. I will be using Questia to further develop articles in these areas. Thank you.  Done
  52. Berita (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2008 with about 12000 edits in de-WP (primarily biographies).--Berita (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  53. Алый Король (talk · contribs) I am a ru-wiki editor. I've 12 Futured and 12 Good Articles in ru-wiki. I would be grateful if you renew my subscription, as I need it in order to write more articles. --Алый Король (talk) 04:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  54. Miyagawa (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009, over 41k edits, only one FA but 13 FLs and nearly 120 GAs. I had a Questia subscription through Wiki previously, but it ran out last year and I forgot to apply here to renew it. Miyagawa (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  55. Gripweed (talk · contribs), Editor in german Wikipedia, editor since 2006 with over 1000 articles . I had a Questia sunscription previously, but forgot to renew it. --Gripweed (talk) 20:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
  56. Niklem (talk · contribs) – Editor and sysop at ru.wiki. I have created almost 400 articles, some of which are good or featured. I use Questia very often, but my account expires on January, 29th. It would be great not to discontinue the access to it. Thank you in advance! --Niklem (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
  57. CrunchySkies (talk · contribs) - Editing from this account since 2012. I've started a few new articles in that time and done some overhauls. I plan to continue pushing out well-sourced articles occasionally, and adding sources to existing articles where I can. I found help researching some obscure topics using Questia. My account has been expired for some time now. I may not edit as regularly as some, but I know I could again make good use of an account once in a while. If there is room left, I'd gladly accept a renewal at any point. Thanks! --CrunchySkies (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  58. Wikipedical (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005 with 12,500+ edits. Active in television and media. Questia has come in handy for my research. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 05:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  59. Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs), active since 2004#AllyD (talk · contribs) - editor since 2005 with over 10,000 mainspace edits. My just-expired Questia account has been useful in referencing articles and in WP:AFD discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  60. rowanwindwhistler (talk · contribs) - Editor since November 18th 2007 with 18179 edits. Active in history in the Spanish Wikipedia. Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 06:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  61. VVVladimir (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2007 with 2,638 edits. Active in history and culture of the Balkans (two FAs, three GAs...). Vladimir (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  62. CMBJ (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2004 with >13,000 en.wp edits. Active in multiple areas of research, including science, technology, and geopolitics. Expanded database access enables me to better contribute, especially in areas that have very limited or no Internet coverage at this time.  — C M B J   13:27, 27 February 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  63. Dennis Bratland (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2004 with 33,580 edits. Active in motorcycling, Seattle, automobiles, bicycles. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  64. Eric Corbett (talk · contribs), possibly under my previous user name of Malleus Fatuorum (talk · contribs). Getting on for 200,000 edits under those two user names, on topics ranging from 17th-century witchcraft trials to 20th-century muscle cars. I found Questia particularly useful for its access to books. Eric Corbett 18:31, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  65. Epipelagic (talk · contribs) – Active for 8 years with 50,000 edits. Mainly develop articles related to marine ecosystems. --Epipelagic (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  66. Emeritus (talk · contribs), global: since 2006 up to 22k/21k edits serving de:WP, german WP; generalist, long-term projects include history of academies and biographies of academians, Pacific affaires, Brazilian affaires. --Emeritus (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  67. Siawase (talk · contribs) Editing since 2006, over 10 000 edits, mostly active in content generation/improvement in culture and biographies. Siawase (talk) 07:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  68. Victoriaearle (talk · contribs) Editing actively since 2009 in the humanities with about 45,000 edits. The books on Questia are helpful. Victoria (tk) 21:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  69. Trust Is All You Need (talk · contribs) - I'm active on articles on communism, the institutionalisation of power, one-party systems and ideologies in general. Questia would give me access to sources to improve my work even further; for instance, i've been writing on the Workers' Party of Korea and the Juche articles recently, but there are few sources out there who write about the topic. If I got access to Questia I could for instance access the article "North Korea: The Domain of the Juche Doctrine" or "North Korea's Race Problem: What I Learned in Eight Years Reading Propaganda from Inside the Hermit Kingdom" (I want to create an article entitled Racism in North Korea) ... Or, I'm currently writing the Ideology of the Communist Party of China, and I need access to sources (but most sources on Chinese ideology today comes from journals), access to Questia would make my work much easier - for instance, I'd love to read (among many others) the "The Three Represents Campaign: Reform the Party or Indoctrinate the Capitalists?" (It will be useful to the article, 100 percent sure)... I've made over 47,000 edits (over 31,000 main page edits) on Wikipedia, created 293 articles and I've been active since 2009. --TIAYN (talk) 07:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC) -  Not done Email not enabled.[reply]
  70. Reify-tech (talk · contribs) 9000+ edits since 2011. I work on a wide and eclectic range of topics, including science, technology, art, design, architecture, culture, history of technology, museums, transportation, and biographies of people related to these topics. Reify-tech (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  71. Softlavender (talk · contribs) Account since 2007; 21,000 edits on 4,800 articles; have created or written the bulk of over 100 articles. I have the HighBeam access and would love to add this. Really need all the sources I can get for new content generation (and fact-checking, etc.). I see Questia articles when I search for facts and would like to be able to read and use/cite them. Thanks! Softlavender (talk) 06:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  72. Magalhães (talk · contribs); editor since 2005 with 80,000+ edits and 3,500+ articles, mostly about the Philippines and on the Dutch wikipedia, but also on the English and German wikipedia. Questia would be an extremely helpfull addition to my sources as it provides acces to books and documents I do not have via my library account.  Done
  73. Ryūkotsusei (talk · contribs) Trying to complete List of million-selling game consoles. I'm not too pleased to find out some sales information is locked behind $1000 business reports so I need to try every other resource possible. « Ryūkotsusei » 12:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done
  74. Alaexis (talk · contribs) I mostly work on the history of Caucasus (both recent and ancient) and medieval Russia so having access to sources would be very helpful. In particular I would like to read "De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty" by Tozun Bahceli and From Chains to Bonds: The Slave Trade Revisited by Doudou Diène. Alæxis¿question? 12:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  75. Vatsan34 (talk · contribs) - I do lot of edits in English Wikipedia and patrol & edit Tamil Wikiprojects. Summing up these two language wiki, I have around 4000+ edits and nearly 5 years of experience here. Though most of the articles I create are oriented to current affairs in India, Yet I will be happy to access the valuable resources of Questia so that I will start working on topics related to History (History is my love,apart from politics and science) - Vatsan34 (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  76. Gongshow (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2008; more than 33,000 edits. My main interests are music, sports, film, and pop culture in general. I am also quite active at AFD, where having access to Questia would be invaluable in enhancing my research abilities in a multitude of subjects.  Gongshow   talk 17:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  77. Madalibi (talk · contribs) – I have been active since 2008 and have done more than 11,000 edits. I mostly edit articles on China and Chinese history, but I occasionally delve into human evolution, prehistory, anthropology, the history of Central Asia, social sciences, UNESCO world heritage sites, etc. I have purchased a large number of books to improve Wikipedia over the years, but have little access to journals. A Questia account would help greatly in that regard! Madalibi (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  78. Timmyshin (talk · contribs) - I have been an editor since 2008; been more active recently. I mostly edit 10th and 11th century East Asian history articles as well as Chinese entertainment articles and have limited access to journals. I have never used Questia before, however, since it features social sciences journals, I'm sure it will help me out greatly. Timmyshin (talk) 14:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  79. Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) In four years of editing Wikipedia, I have contributed 28,000 edits, including a number of featured lists and good articles. I would use these resources to expand and improve coverage of sources used by articles in the field of military history - primarily those dealing with the breakup of Yugoslavia.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  80. Uhlan (talk · contribs) - I have been a Wikipedia editor for several years now, during which time I have created over twenty five articles. I am interested in history and politics, and these interests are reflected in my editing. Naturally, it is difficult to gain a wide variety of sources (particularly primary sources) in order to reference Wikipedia articles, and as a result I would find it useful to browse the Questia online library for sources. Thank you. Uhlan talk 05:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  81. Nick-D (talk · contribs) I've been an active editor since 2005, mainly working on articles covering Australian military history and Australian politics. I've developed 27 articles to FA class, and another 21 to A-class or GA standard. I used to have access to Questia resources through my university's library (and found the full-text books to be very useful for developing Wikipedia articles), but do not have access since I finished my masters last year. Nick-D (talk) 08:28, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  82. Lova Falk (talk · contribs) More than 24,000 edits, 70% in mainspace. Even though my main focus is on psychology articles, I was one of the top 10 medical contributors in 2013. A lot of my work is checking sources - but unfortunately I don't have access to sources through my job. Lova Falk talk 11:47, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  83. Wolbo (talk · contribs) Made about 45,000 edits since 2006 and created some 125 BLPs. Mainly editing in the area of sports (tennis) bios and history. Would like to use Questia's sources to further improve these articles and their citations and hopefully take a few to GA status.--Wolbo (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  84. Kmzayeem (talk · contribs) I have been editing in Wikipedia since May 2012 and have made over 9000 edits so far with almost 80% of them being in the mainspace. My prime interests have been the articles related to culture, arts, music, history and economy of Bangladesh and South Asia in general. Apart from content creation, I have actively participated in the verification of numerous existing articles as well as saving several articles from deletion. A free access to Questia's online resources would help me a lot to do the works more effectively.--Zayeem (talk) 17:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  85. Alexikoua (talk · contribs). I'm active since 2008, with significant contribution to the wp:DYK column (66 articles), 11 GAs and 20,000 edits in total. I need new databases to use them as references, especially in the field of history.Alexikoua (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  86. SMcCandlish (talk · contribs). Not a renewal, but formerly approved for both Credo and Highbeam. Wikipedian for 8+ years. I have a degree in anthropology and applied linguistics, but am not a professional academic so I don't have journal access any longer. My main journal needs are in life sciences (felinology, herpetology, commercial animal breeding, history of domestication), anthropology/archaeology/history (e.g. history of sport), and various other topics (I'm a major contributor to articles on albinism, linguistics, and other subjects that require citation of peer reviewed sources).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  87. EtienneDolet (talk · contribs) I have over 14,000 edits and have been editing since 2007. I have made at least 200 articles. I really need new databases to sources. Étienne Dolet (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  88. PRRfan (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2006 with more than 14,000 edits. Like Philadelphia and railroad history but have contributed widely. Thanks. PRRfan (talk) 03:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  89. Parkwells (talk · contribs) Editor since 2007 with more than 100,000 edits. Contribute mostly in 19th-century US history, particularly African-American and Native American topics, frontier, migration and Reconstruction and after; but have also contributed to indigenous archeology and histories, US and European literature and art, Central and South American archeology, history, and many other areas. I follow up with many sources, and find and add new academic content and cites/sources to strengthen articles, including Googlebooks, Gutenberg Project, and academic sources such as UNC's Documenting the American South, which has many historic sources online. Do not have access to Questia through my library or university.Parkwells (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  90. Pokey5945 (talk · contribs) I have over a thousand edits since 2005 (and more under my previous user name). My Wikipedia work focuses mainly on American social movements and their leaders, some music articles, and various other random articles that catch my interest. I've created five articles across my two user names. Questia is a first-rate source for accessing journalistic and scholarly sources, and would be very useful in my editing endeavors.Pokey5945 (talk) 20:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  91. Coretheapple (talk · contribs) I have over 8000 edits in my two years on the project, and have eclectic interests ranging from early Broadway theater to choreography to the oil industry to the Chicano labor movement. Questia would be greatly helpful in this content work. Coretheapple (talk) 22:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  92. A1candidate (talk · contribs) Over 13,000 edits since 2012. Most of my contributions are related to medicine, biographies, history, popular culture and music. Would like to retrieve older publications via Questia. -A1candidate (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  93. Prototime (talk · contribs) Editor since 2005 with more than 6,500 edits. I predominately contribute to law and human rights articles, including bringing two articles on major pieces of U.S. legislation to GA status. I hope to use Questia to enhance my research in these areas. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 04:31, 10 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  94. Iñaki LL (talk · contribs) Hi, I am an English wikipedia editor, occasionally on the Basque, French and Spanish ones also. Editor since January 2008 with 3,300 edits. I work on areas related to Basque language, culture, geography, and history—text, pictures, and maps. I also have a handful of worldwide and Basque specific pictures uploaded in wikicommons. I find little on English sources related to these topics, and often based on Spanish references. A good part of my contribution so far came down to bridging information gaps and fixing inaccuracies. While I have attempted to gain access to English language journals, I find many or most of the papers are (frustratingly) restricted. Iñaki LL (talk) 10:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)  Not done due to inactive e-mail.[reply]
  95. AntanO (talk · contribs) Hi, I have been on Wikipedia since 2011 and currently have over 1300 edits in English Wikipedia and over 16200 edits in Tamil Wikipedia. I'm interested in history, biography, science, etc. Online resources would be very helpful in order to improve the articles with reliable citations. --AntonTalk 01:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  96. Makyen (talk · contribs) I am active in content verification. I routinely read/check references to verify that article text is consistent with the cited reference. I also perform a considerable amount of citation data verification (i.e. citations accurately describe the reference in a way that allows a reader to obtain the reference for verification). While my primary expertise is technical, I do this on a wide range of articles. — Makyen (talk) 06:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  97. Felis domestica (talk · contribs)4 yrs, ca 15k edits, 200+articles, pl-wiki sysop. I lost my local Questia access (policy change) and would be happy to use it again. Mainly for resources on Far East (esp. China)--Felis domestica (talk) 00:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  98. Macspaunday (talk · contribs)Since 2006, 3000+ edits, working mostly in modern literature and culture, verifying and clarifying details. - Macspaunday (talk) 01:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  99. Iketsi (talk · contribs) Since 2010, >3000 edits on the English Wikipedia alone, interested mostly in linguistics and geography. --Iketsi (talk) 02:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  100. Judae1 (talk · contribs) - I have been editing since 2006 and often try to look up valid refs for articles I encounter on Wiki in need of citations to make them stronger or to make them appropriate for Wikipedia in the first place. My articles are usually about people, history or places. This would help a great deal. Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  101. WAVY 10 Fan (talk · contribs): I have been actively editing since 2006 in multiple areas with over 6000 edits; mainly focusing on everything from sports, pop culture, media, religion among other topics while creating 44 articles. My goal with Questia access would be for addition research opportunities. -- WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  102. Jfhutson (talk · contribs): Renewal. Active editor with > 10,000 edits. I took a break recently but I am back and would like to start contributing content again. I usually work on religious history and theology oriented articles. --JFH (talk) 01:30, 15 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  103. 99kerob (talk · contribs): Active at pl.wikipedia - more than 9600 edits, 2 FA, 16 GA, 6 FL, more than 60 DYK. Interested especially in sports. 99kerob (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  104. Manxruler (talk · contribs): Active at en.wikipedia since 2005, more than 37,000 edits on the project since then, mostly on history-related subjects. 5 GAs and 68 DYKs. Manxruler (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  105. rdrozd (talk · contribs): I've been mostly editing pl.wikipedia (over 16k edits, 200+ articles from scratch). I specialize in theological and historical subjects which are fairly well covered by Questia. rdrozd (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  106. Mika58 (talk · contribs): I've been since 2007 active and mostly editing pl.wikipedia (over 4k edits). I'd like trying reading and citing Questia. Mika58 (talk) 14:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  107. El Matador (talk · contribs): Editor since 2008 with circa 4,000 edits, mostly in pl.wikipedia. I'm interested in classical Hollywood cinema so an access to Questia would be very helpful. El Matador (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  108. Karol Karolus (talk · contribs): Active at pl.wikipedia and pl.wikibooks (four textbooks), since 2007 (with another user`s name), now by unified login 4215 edits at pl.wiki, intrested about Byzantine Empire (in 2012 wikigrant Palailogos). Karol Karolus (talk) 20:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  109. Leszek Jańczuk (talk · contribs): I've been editing since 2008, 100 000 edits on en-wiki, 200 000 edits in global project. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 01:06, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  110. Ravit (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2008 with about 18,000 edits, especially in he.wiki. Active in psychology, and hope to improve articles in this field by using Questia. Ravit (talk) 19:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  111. Tvoz - Renewal request. Editor since 2006, closing in on 26,000 edits. Edit interests include but not limited to political biographies; people and events of significance in the popular culture, particularly of the second half of the 20th century; jumping on suddenly high-traffic articles about such people who have recently died but their articles are not up to our standards -- detailed information often not available through the usual middle-of-the-night Google searches. I spend a lot of time fact-checking and doing research for these articles, and continued immediate access to academic books and journals would be extremely helpful. Thanks Tvoz/talk 22:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  112. Mion (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005, 17 k edits, article creation, updating and fact checking mainly. Mion (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  113. Eric Corbett (talk · contribs) I used to have access to Questia and I found it very useful, but my account expired some time ago. I've been editing since 2006 and have something like forty-eight featured articles to my credit. I'd be using Questia to help in particular with my work on literature, folklore and mythology articles. Eric Corbett 21:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  114. Historiograf (talk · contribs) 20 K edits in de.wikipedia since 2005, admin in de.wikisource and de.wikiquote. Total editcount : 37,093. Founder of de.wp:bibr in 2006 --Historiograf (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  115. Sturmvogel_66 (talk · contribs) Former MilHist coordinator, would like access to expand my ship and aircraft articles. Editing since 2007, over 300 GAs and 50 featured articles and lists.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  116. Ravpapa - Long-time editor. Most recent articles were Grosse Fuge and rewrite of Ronn Torossian. Recently lost my access to Questia through the university library because I didn't take any courses this year. It is an invaluable resource.--Ravpapa (talk) 03:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  117. Jyoti.mickey I am active in literature, philosophy, and religion related articles. I have access to British Council Mumbai but it has very limited resource. I will use Questia resources to expand my research on these subjects from the Indian subcontinent. --Jyoti (talk) 03:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  118. User:Zambelo Zambelo - I'm primarily active in New Religious Movement-related articles, which suffer from a low amount of scholarly sources. I would improve these articles and increase neutrality by providing a greater range of quality references. Zambelo; talk 04:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Not done - No Email enabled[reply]
  119. Froaringus (talk · contribs) - Renew. I usually edit articles about the history and prehistory of Galicia/Spain/Western Europe, and Questia is a valuable resource.--Froaringus (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  120. 97198 (talk · contribs) – Editor since 2006. I am mostly active in article creation, particularly biographies, filmmaking and women's history. An extra resource would be extremely helpful. 97198 (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  121. Dolovis - I am active in researching mostly biographical articles (sports bios and others) and am often looking for reliable sources to verify biographical information. Access to these resources would be extremely helpful. Dolovis (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done  Done[reply]
  122. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs) Been bouncing around about 9 years. I spend a lot of time hunting sources for my own work and on behalf of others, for origination, expansion and for verification and have had to make requests at WP:RX for material this would allow me to access directly. Approaching 80K edits (by X's counter) and just had my third featured article promoted. I do not have access to this database through my local library or otherwise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  123. Mostly fr-wiki editor with a few K edits, currently mainly reviewing GAs, I'd like to benefit from some serendipity effect in browsing such quality resource. Xentyr (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  124. Loginnigol (talk · contribs) Active editor for a couple of years on English and Dutch language Wikipedia. Over 7000 page edits. Contribute editing in many areas but particularly arts, science, history, religion, music and sports, all of which are areas that I very much need such a high quality resource archive like Questia. —Loginnigol (talk) 12:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  125. רחל1 (talk · contribs) Editor on Hebrew Wikipedia (he:User:רחל1) since 2004 with more the 100000 edits and 330 articles. My main focus is on literature, films and TV. Access to resources from Questia would be most helpful. רחל1 (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  126. Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) Active for a few years now, over 35000 edits, 4 FA/FL, 34 GA, 100+ created. Use JSTOR for natural history, Questia should be helpful for actual history when working on book articles from Ancient Greece onwards. Chiswick Chap (talk)  Done
  127. FormerIP (talk · contribs) I have about 16,000 edits. I previously had Questia access, and used it a fair amount on WP, but I don't have it anymore. Formerip (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  128. Dr.Gulliver (talk), active in English Wikipedia, specializing in 18th Century and "Atlantic World" topics, with the odd modern subject thrown in. As an expat, lack easy access to English libraries or books in print, so rely on public domain and online resources when doing verification and clean-up of articles. Questia access would be helpful!  Done
  129. WCCasey (talk · contribs) Active editor since 2009, near 3000 edits, most in California history. I hope to gain online access on Questia to Santa Anna of Mexico, by Will Fowler. WCCasey (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  130. codrinb (talk · contribs) I frequently contribute to archaeology and history articles, and having access to Questia would allow me to source these articles using academic papers and books on the mentioned topics.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  131. Dwpaul (talk · contribs) No current access to Questia. As reviewer/rollbacker, would use to verify citations and/or add them to uncited edits to articles on a variety of topics. Dwpaul Talk 02:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  132. M2545 (talk · contribs) Since 2009 active in histories of cities. M2545 (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  133. Manxruler (talk · contribs) I've created 52 articles and made over 37,000 edits, mostly on historical subjects. Would appreciate access to this, always in search of sources. Manxruler (talk) 13:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Scotchorama (talk · contribs) Editor since 2007, focusing mainly on Chinese history, the European Union, and Luxembourg.Scotchorama (talk) 15:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  135. OR drohowa (talk · contribs) I would use it to edit articles on gender, feminism, LGBT topics, contemporary art, and other topics of interest to GLAM institutions. OR drohowa (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  136. Oceanh (talk · contribs), active on Wikipedia since 2007, >20,000 edits, mainly content related, often with a historical perspective. Would appreciate access to Questia (have currently no access). Oceanh (talk) 12:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  137. Zellfaze (talk · contribs) Editor for a bit over 6 years and mostly work on local history these days (actually just ran an edit-a-thon related to it even). I applied for and was given access to Highbeam, but there may be some newspapers in Questia that Highbeam does not have. If given account I will also use it on WP:RX to help others verify and find resources. Zell Faze (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  138. Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs), active since 2004, the first person to receive a DYK medal, ca. 267,000 edits in total (82,000 in the English Wikipedia + 172,000 in the Russian Wikipedia). My area of expertise is the history and culture of Russia and Ukraine. The Questia resources are likely to be helpful in improving the coverage of these subjects (which is still poor). --Ghirla-трёп- 06:14, 27 June 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  139. Paulscrawl (talk · contribs), active since 2006 with creation of AI@50 and, even with a modest 1200+ edits, was granted Reviewer status during the early days of Deepwater Horizon oil spill and a few related articles I created and edited. Always looking for sources that won't expire due to link rot, so books are preferred sources. Looking to get back into improving Wikipedia's coverage of cultural history, for which Questia's humanities and social sciences resources are ideal. I've used Questia before and will make my ability to access Questia known to other editors who may want a factoid cited. Thanks! Paulscrawl (talk) 06:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  140. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs), since 2008. I'm grateful for my free access to Questia in the past, and I would love to continue using it. SteveStrummer (talk) 02:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  141. AmateurEditor (talk · contribs), active since 2009 with about 3000 edits. I have an interest in history and I am interested in Questia for those sort of references. AmateurEditor (talk) 17:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  142. khamar - Apply for use in Todays Articles for Improvement. I am also active in recent changes patrol and improving articles related to scientific method and skepticism. Kyle(talk) 05:03, 7 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  143. Ravenswing (talk · contribs) - I've been a Wikipedia editor for approaching ten years and 40,000 edits. I'm active in research for older hockey subjects and in AfD, and have had a Questia account in the past. Ravenswing 15:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  144. Kansas Bear (talk · contribs) - Renewing my Questia account. 18K+ edits. I write references covering historical articles from the Indus Valley to England from ancient to medieval times. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  145. Viswaprabha (talk · contribs) I am an editor at various Wikipedias including en but predominantly on Indic Wikis. Access to this library will be much useful to me as I am in constant search for authentic references and citations pertaining to history, science, biographies and Indo-European languages apart from other topics. Thank you. ViswaPrabhaവിശ്വപ്രഭtalk 00:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  146. Laszlo Panaflex (talk · contribs) WP editor for about eight years, especially active the last two years, about four thousand edits. Most of my work is on medieval history articles. Access to a wider array of sources would be very useful to my research. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  147. Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) - can certainly be useful for my work with medieval English subjects. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  148. Danimations (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) - I can see Questia access becoming very useful in my work on industrial history and natural history content creation and expansion. I do not have access to this service currently, but have found articles of immediate use within its database. Danimations (talk) 13:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Not done Invalid email address.[reply]
  149. WolfgangRieger (talk · contribs) Editor on de-WP since 2003 with 40000+ edits there. Main focus is ancient geography and history. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 17:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  150. Jacqke (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Such a common occurrence: I am pursuing a very relevant reference for an article online only to find it is JSTOR or Questia and I cannot read the reference. I write biographies and also musical history oriented articles. The article Mandore (instrument) is an example. An academic research database would help me by allowing me access to better quality references.Jacqke (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  151. Prioryman (talk · contribs) I've been an editor since 2004; I've made around 50,000 edits in that time and have created numerous FAs and GAs (see my user page for a list). Highbeam would be very useful in helping with my main areas of focus (mainly history, archaeology and related topics). Prioryman (talk) 20:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  152. Mendaliv (talk · contribs) I believe access to this service would be greatly beneficial to my recent increase of coverage of international law topics. I have over 28,000 edits across a wide range of topical areas, which includes reference verification. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 07:44, 2 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  153. Arxiloxos (talk · contribs) My Questia subscription has apparently expired. I have been using it regularly to improve sourcing and to establish notability in AfDs. I have been editing since 2008 and have more than 20,000 edits. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  154. 28bytes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have edited here for several years, with around 25,000 total edits. I have created 100 or so articles, mostly on music and video game topics. Questia access could be very useful in expanding those articles and building new ones. 28bytes (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  155. Duffit5 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I've worked mainly on UK biographies dating back to the 11th century. Access to this database would be particularly beneficial for article expansion. Duffit talk 20:02, 4 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  156. Shrike (talk · contribs) I am active in middle eastern topics, the access needed for source verification and addition of new material--Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 04:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  157. Zeorymer (talk · contribs) I am editor of articles in the Portugal namespace, including content of a historic, political and cultural importance. A Questia access would permit improved content development and referencing of subjects related to Portugal, a section of Wikipedia that is missing more comprehensively referenced content. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 14:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  158. Blackknight12 (talk · contribs) I am primarily active in Wikiproject Sri Lanka and currently working on historical political and judicial articles. I have come across useful articles in HighBeam, however I currently do not have access.--Blackknight12 (talk) 03:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
  159. 2T (talk · contribs) - I'm active since 2005 with +90000 edits in TH WP - 2T (talk) 22:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)  Done[reply]
  160. Davewild (talk · contribs) Would like to reapply for Questia access which I had from 2012 to 2013. Active on politics and elections articles, as well as contributing at AFD so would be useful. Davewild (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Bogger (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) — I will use it for articles relating to Ireland (including Northern Ireland). Bogger (talk) 14:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Melly42 (talk · contribs) - I am an active Wikipedia editor since 2005. My fields are biology (zoology, botany) as well as film and pop music. Would be great to have access to the provided books --Melly42 (talk) 06:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  163. ca$e (talk · contribs) - active mostly on de.WP in areas of philosophy and religious studies with >40k edits; as current questia account will soon expire, i request a renewal. Thanks, Ca$e (talk) 08:08, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Questia&oldid=621322140"