Only Revolutions
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
 |
 | |
| Author | Mark Z. Danielewski |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Genre | Literary fiction |
| Publisher | Pantheon Books |
Publication date | 12 September 2006 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Media type | Print (Hardcover) |
| Pages | 360 pp |
| ISBN | 0-375-42176-9 |
| OCLC | 64427527 |
| 813/.54 22 | |
| LC Class | PS3554.A5596 O55 2006 |
| Preceded by | The Fifty Year Sword |
Only Revolutions is an American road novel by writer Mark Z. Danielewski. It was released in the United States on September 12, 2006 by Pantheon Books. It was a finalist for the 2006 National Book Award for Fiction.
Plot summary
The story alternates between two different narratives: Sam & Hailey, and Hailey & Sam, wild and wayward teenagers who never grow old. With an evolving stable of cars, the teenagers move through various places and moments in time as they try to outrace history.
As the story proceeds, one can note that many events are perceptual and not certain. By reading both stories some sense can be made from this poetic styled puzzle. The words written are a vague mix of poetry and stream of consciousness prose. Both Hailey and Sam depict their feelings as well as ideas and thoughts towards one another. It is truly difficult to summarize the plot as most readers will understand the parts of story in different ways.
It can also be noted that the end very much leads into the beginning. It is possible, after finishing the book, to continue the story from the beginning a la James Joyce's Finnegans Wake.
Reception
In a review for The Guardian, Steven Poole praised Only Revolutions and wrote "The book is to be admired for its sheer zest for invention, the kind of faith in ambitious literature so rare among contemporary novelists. And though it can often be baffling and tiresome, it also has enough flashes of expressionistic brilliance and sustained deliriums of invention to justify the reach."[1] In contrast, Sean O'Hagan criticized the book as being "dense and overly-complicated" and commented that "There is enough experimentation here to keep academics and cyber-geeks satisfied for years to come, but long before the end - wherever that is - I was left longing for the lull and sway of a classic tale well told."[2]
References
- ^ Poole, Steven. "O how clever". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 August 2014.
- ^ O'Hagan, Sean. "I wouldn't say this is unreadable ..." Retrieved 17 August 2014.