User talk:Yacatisma

Leyla Yunus

Template:RestoredPROD Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance.--Yacatisma (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dumfries Courier

Thanksfor having a look at the Dumfries Courier page. Any particular sentences that you feel could benefit from additional / better sources? Mhbeals (talk) 07:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you add external link that should be enough.--Yacatisma (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really sorry. I don't understand. An external link to what? To related sites (like the archives which hold it)?Mhbeals (talk) 10:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok. Article is ready and fine.--Yacatisma (talk) 15:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard de Rose

Thank you for your recent review of Gerard de Rose. As I read Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals an artist can be considered notable if their work is held (in the permanent collections of) several notable galleries. I assume galleries are notable if they have Wikipedia articles. de Rose's work is in the permanent collections of at least three notable galleries - see: Gerard de Rose#Holdings (Touchstones provides the art gallery for the Rochdale Arts & Heritage Service). Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit and improvement of the article. I removed the template

GA review swap?

Hi Yacatisma, I saw that you have Baku up for a GA review. I've just recently nominated Antananarivo, the capital of Madagascar. Would you be interested in doing a GA review swap? I could review yours, and you review mine? Since we're both writing on capitals, I think we'd be in a good position to review each other's work with a similar outlook, to the benefit of both articles. - Lemurbaby (talk) 00:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yacatisma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is public computer and IP shouldn't banned for people to use it. Yacatisma (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A combination of technical and behavioral evidence shows that you are using multiple accounts in violation of policy. As such, I'm declining your unblock request. Mike V • Talk 20:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.