Talk:Sega Pico/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 00:15, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I can do this one. A few initial comments:

Why "Marilyn A. Gillen" and not last, first?
Why is the Japanese name italicized, and why does it come before the American one that's the name of the article?
Remove comma in "February, 1998".
Why is it called a "toy" in the first sentence but a "video game console" everywhere else (including the navbox and categories)? I'd think "educational video game console" or something would be fine and unambiguous.
The Sonic Gameworld image needs a caption that better demonstrates its use - what's the game like and why's it significant (even if only in being a typical example of a Pico game - and, if so, how?). The FUR could use a little expansion, too, though this isn't necessary for GA.

I'll start looking at this in the next couple of days. Particularly aggressive stretch of work is currently delaying me a bit. Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 02:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Whenever you have time. Actually, I have some Graph Theory homework that really needs attention, so catch ya later. Tezero (talk) 02:36, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]