Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sutton twin towns mural

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Necrothesp (talk | contribs) at 12:28, 10 September 2014 (Sutton twin towns mural: delsort). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sutton twin towns mural (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a mural where the reliable secondary sources consist of one local article ([1]the Sutton Guardian, a localized page of the Guardian)? The only other source I could find, also a local paper[2], is a copy of the press release by the Sutton Press Office[3].

These murals for the moment lack the necessary Notability to have an article here. Fram (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article has already been cleared for DYK. AfD seems inconsistent. In addition to the three sources already in the article, I've found this interesting feature on Sutton which highlights the mural [4] A P Monblat (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DYK doesn't check for notability. Wordpress blogs don't count, and the three sources are the repeat of the press release I linked to above, and two times the exact same article (the local Guardian page) under different headings. So that's still one independent but local source. Fram (talk) 11:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]