Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWAS-TV (GMA)

DWAS-TV (GMA)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP, lack of independent secondary sources Cult of Green (talk) 01:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Broadcast_media says: "Licensed radio and TV stations are generally kept as notable if they broadcast over the air and originate at least a portion of their programming schedule in their own studios." Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They also still require actual sourcing of some kind, and can still be redirected to a larger related article (e.g. the network, a list of media in their location, etc.) if such sourcing cannot be located. Bearcat (talk) 03:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if some actual sourcing can be located; redirect to GMA Network if it can't. Bearcat (talk) 03:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain - TV channels are kept per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Broadcast_media. –Davey2010 • (talk) 07:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]