User talk:108.215.8.245

May 2013

Hello, I'm Mann jess. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Bible and slavery because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Jess· Δ ♥ 05:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Bible and slavery with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tiger versus lion. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Amaury (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Bible and slavery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Jess· Δ ♥ 16:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Amaury. DVdm (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mann Jess, if you aren't familiar with the Bible, than I can understand: clearly against the teachings of Christ means that the New Testament is against slavery, not the Old Testament. Furthermore, if you're as impartial as you have claimed, than why do you allow the introduction of the page to say "slavery is regulated not only in the Old Testament, but also in the New one as well"? It obviously isn't, and the source I provided is much stronger than the ambiguous one provided on the New Testament "slavery".

Hello, 108.215.8.245. You have new messages at Rivertorch's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:32, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

108.215.8.245, would you please see WP:3RR. No one is allowed to make more than three reverts at an article within a 24 hour period. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three revert rule, so do please stop making multiple reverts at Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. I assure you that it is quite pointless. ImprovingWiki (talk) 03:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then tell me how I can report your account.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.