User talk:MandatoryTeaser

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Nomination of Selfie Slam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Selfie Slam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selfie Slam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis 13:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read here: http://www.rovio.com/en/news/blog/540/selfie-slam-out-now-in-finland-sweden-and-canada And i know that found in the article so. Do you want to accept it the nomination please! COME ON! :( User:Dennis Brown MandatoryTeaser (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming editor names

Please don't spam the names of apparently arbitrary editors asking them to buy, play and write about your favourite game. If an article needs expansion and is tagged as a WP:STUB, interested editors will eventually find it by themselves. --McGeddon (talk) 09:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I sawed on Twitter @McGeddon: https://twitter.com/wpstubs/status/511865054086459392 was investigated stub bots there. MandatoryTeaser (talk) 10:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. That's no reason to alert an apparently arbitrary group of editors asking them to help you. If you need help writing an article about a video game, try WP:VG. --McGeddon (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Note that if you've deliberately selected a group of editors who you think might like Rovio games because there's currently an AfD in progress on the article you wrote and you'd like them to defend it, this is inappropriate.) --McGeddon (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. OK. Thanks for the asking for helping me. McGeddon. MandatoryTeaser (talk) 10:16, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, posting notices such as this on other users' talkpages may constitute canvassing as well. If users are interested in an AfD, they'll find and comment on it by themselves; there is no need to inform uninterested people. Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 00:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We'll, but the official website is confirmed with the AFD

[1] here. I thinking so well to thanks for the reliable sources was confirmed? Maybe… MandatoryTeaser (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MandatoryTeaser, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MandatoryTeaser! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luann (comic strip)

Why did you revert my edits to this article? You didn't give a reason. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:08, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonation

Warning: Why did you claim to have admin rights when this is not true? Same goes for the other rights you claim in your user page. Please explain here. Any further violations or trying to deceive users will lead to a blocking of the account. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I just live in the Philippines but the most reviewer and rollbacker. Just the under construction about. The Mini hobbies and the correct articles might be me. MandatoryTeaser (talk) 12:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from 72.26.190.195

Marie Currie What did you change on Marie Currie's page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.190.195 (talk) 00:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that other users are reverting to you. MandatoryTeaser (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block nomination

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MandatoryTeaser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Haven't since of the Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Retry was created since of Retry has been created by User:Bryancyriel. There is response await for the Nomination for deletion of the article and the drafts are missed too. It is not a checkuser or block sock puppet maybe in the USA. MandatoryTeaser (talk) 02:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Haven't since of the [[Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Retry]] was created since of [[Retry]] has been created by [[User:Bryancyriel]]. There is response await for the Nomination for deletion of the article and the drafts are missed too. It is not a checkuser or block sock puppet maybe in the USA. [[User:MandatoryTeaser|MandatoryTeaser]] ([[User talk:MandatoryTeaser#top|talk]]) 02:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Haven't since of the [[Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Retry]] was created since of [[Retry]] has been created by [[User:Bryancyriel]]. There is response await for the Nomination for deletion of the article and the drafts are missed too. It is not a checkuser or block sock puppet maybe in the USA. [[User:MandatoryTeaser|MandatoryTeaser]] ([[User talk:MandatoryTeaser#top|talk]]) 02:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Haven't since of the [[Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Retry]] was created since of [[Retry]] has been created by [[User:Bryancyriel]]. There is response await for the Nomination for deletion of the article and the drafts are missed too. It is not a checkuser or block sock puppet maybe in the USA. [[User:MandatoryTeaser|MandatoryTeaser]] ([[User talk:MandatoryTeaser#top|talk]]) 02:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}