Jump to content

Talk:List of high-speed railway lines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Makrom (talk | contribs) at 00:46, 2 October 2014 (US high speed tracks: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Opening date

Hello Owennson. For the Opening date, I recommand to only put the year (not the full date), for the reasons :

  • be more light, and avoid a too rich table
  • avoid the US date format, that is not used elsewhere
  • the opening date is not still well defined (opening for test, inauguration, opening in commercial service, etc).
  • make the column sortable

Regards, --FlyAkwa (talk) 10:19, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. However, this is not my talk page, "Hi Owennson" seems to be too odd. Sorry for being so serious though.--Owennson (talk) 13:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger_proposal

I propose to merge High-speed rail by country and List of high-speed rail lines.
The old page High-speed rail by country is now quasi-empty, while its content has been displaced in a new page, Planned_high-speed_rail_by_country, months ago.
Indeed, the High-speed rail by country page has never own the list of high-speed lines, but only some planed high-speed lines, that are now in the appropriate page.
The new page page that has just been created, List of high-speed rail lines, contains what the "High-speed rail by country" should have contained.
I propose to only keep the List of high-speed rail lines, equivalent of the List of high-speed trains, and to copy the first table of High-speed rail by country on top of the List of high-speed rail lines.
--FlyAkwa (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upgraded lines

Why does the article count "upgraded" lines in some countries but not others? bobrayner (talk) 23:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We look at the maximum upgraded speed. If it exceeds or reach 200 km/h, then it would count. However, some countries like Japan, the so-called "upgraded lines" are basically meaningless - as you said, not high-speed at all.--Owennson (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add a column for manufacturer? (and/or country of manufacturer?)

I think many people would like to know which countries are the major producers of high-speed trains. And which firms. Bombardier, Siemens, ThyssenKrupp, CSR Qingdao Sifang, Alstom, Patentes Talgo, Kawasaki, Hitachi, etc. Which countries export the most high-speed trains (in dollar terms)? Thank you. Benefac (talk) 03:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about high-speed lines, that are independent of the rolling stock (ie German Siemens ICE 3 runs on French lines) : please see List of high-speed trains and High-speed rail. --FlyAkwa (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In which case: Why don't we mention who built the infrastructure? It doesn't appear by government decree. bobrayner (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

US high speed tracks

in the chart of high speed tracks per country (in the Overview section), the US is described as having "No dedicated lines" and has a value of 0 km total. Now the chart seems to state high speed track, I don't think those two are interchangeable. If high speed track is defined as track suitable for speeds exceeding 200 km/h and there are US trains exceeding that speed (Acela), it seems obvious that there must be some high speed track within the US. I don't have any sources about the amount of existing high speed track so I can't correct it, but I'd be inclined to just remove the US entry as long as no information has been found. As I understand it, stating a value of 0 isn't just misleading, if my above reasoning is correct, it would be wrong.