User talk:Jarble

This user wastes far too much time editing Wikipedia.

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Comparison of platform virtual machines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Software package

Demand Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Capitalizing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18,

Clarify it yourself

Please stop adding clarify spans to the Haxe article. If you think it needs clarification, find citations for the same and add it yourself. Also stop describing each language you link to in the See Also section. That is entirely unnecessary since I have provided headers under which they are listed. -- Tom Jenkins ^(reply)

Ping

Hello, Jarble. You have new messages at Montanabw's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

	The Cure Award
	In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

MOHROn listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MOHROn. Since you had some involvement with the MOHROn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comedy of the commons Wikipedia

I think your revert on the WP article site might be formally OK, but the source you refered to as being elder than WP is about the comedy (and WP falls under its terms). You seem to have medical background, compare the Semmelweis reflex, it is an old story but still may apply today. Thats said, I would prefer you suggest a better wording insetad of reverting. Serten (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Refinancing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debt obligation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dog skeleton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dog skeleton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the page to User:Jarble/Dog skeleton, where you can have more time to work on it. WilyD 07:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translations from Czech

Jarble, while I welcome and encourage you to translate pages from other languages, Dog skeleton is not how to do it. The {{expand Czech}} template is used for an article that already exists and can be better. It's not to be used to request a new page. If you wish to translate a page, translate first, then post. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Sexual Behaviour

Dear Jarble, on this comparing revisions page of Animal Sexual Behaviour you can see (with ctrl+f or other search function) those offspring. English is not my mother language (Dutch is), but I am right, I guess, asserting that those should be followed by a plural noun. I don't know how to correct the sentence or maybe the whole paragraph, started by Flyer22 on 8 March 2014. Would you be willing to correct this avenue of thought?

Since you are an important editor of this big article, I write this to you, rather than mentioning this in general. As a Wikipedia-article gets older, I perceive, scrolling in the history of an article, that now and then some pieces or whole paragraphs from the past seem more reliable and/or stylish better than the actual version. --Dartelaar [write me!] 14:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]