Jump to content

Talk:The Hockey Stick Illusion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jonathan A Jones (talk | contribs) at 21:26, 10 October 2014 (→Deletion of McKitrick quote: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Reception

Reference #12 cites a positive review by a petroleum geologist in the August 2010 issue of Geoscientist (i.e. the monthly magazine of the Geological Society of London). However, this positive review was followed by a rebuttal and editorial comment in the October 2010 issue; and by the Society's statement on the attribution of climate change to human activity in the November 2010 issue. Mlack65 (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, interesting. Those reviews weren't around when we hashed out that section of the article. I'll try to work them in at some point later this week. Thanks for pointing them out! Sailsbystars (talk) 12:44, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Add wikilink to Stephen McIntyre's ... 209.255.78.138 (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Already is linked. Guettarda (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is this Add wikilink to ... related to Richard A. Muller's "I Stick to Science": Why Richard A. Muller wouldn't tell House climate skeptics what they wanted to hear by Michael D. Lemonick May 25, 2011 Scientific American who writes about Mr. McIntyre? 99.112.213.34 (talk) 03:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why it should be - this is an article about a book. Guettarda (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is a current response the the book's info. Link is currently available. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 19:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=i-stick-to-science isn't available now, stated "Subscribe". 99.112.214.185 (talk) 00:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is from Joseph J. Romm's ClimateProgress.org http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Muller.pdf 97.87.29.188 (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is Bishop Hill?

What is Bishop Hill? 99.181.159.117 (talk) 04:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the blog of the book's author. Sailsbystars (talk) 12:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On Squarespace. 99.181.132.99 (talk) 06:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Curry's new thoughts on the book

Dr. Curry recently posted this at her blog:

I’ve been engaging with skeptics since 2006 (before starting Climate Etc., I engaged mainly at ClimateAudit). People were suspicious and wondered what I was up to, but the vilification didn’t start until I recommended that people read The Hockey Stick Illusion. The book itself, plus more significantly my vilification simply for recommending that people read the book, has pushed me over the ledge and into a mode of aggressively challenging the IPCC consensus.... Source: [1]

I'm not quite sure how to use this, but it's interesting. Scroll down to "JC’s message to Mark Lynas" for more. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After giving this some thought, I've posted a quote from her essay at Judith Curry#An opening mind, which is probably the better place for her opinions. --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of McKitrick quote

No good reason has been given for deletion of the McKitrick quote. The fact that the book is based on the work of McKitrick and McIntyre is grounds for including it, not grounds for deletion: it is highly relevant that McKitrick considers the book a good introduction to his work. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Hockey_Stick_Illusion&oldid=629105209"