Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Derrin Tanser (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 16 October 2014 (→creation/Captain Brock: Space Badger: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Sarah J Price

is a Welsh Playwright, film maker TV, Film and West End actor, reality star, musician, sports journalist, comedy writer and stand up performer, (Edinburgh festival, NYC Comedy club) and regular international radio and TV guest. the page was originally merged with two other Sarah Price's in an act of vandalism, the swimmer was separated, but the two 'film' Sarah Price's remained as one, my attempt to get the page back up and running on its own was removed, the main reason given for its deletion being "I found lots of Sarah Prices, but not this one" the problem being because of Ms Price's varied career a fair few of the 'lots of Sarah Price's' were indeed her, she has also worked under several stage names since she began her career in early childhood. her recent output as an actor I feel merits the page to be reinstated and updated. -Jasperxj (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Jasperxj (talk)[reply]

  • This ran through AfD and since you're saying that there were other sources and that she was merged with other Prices as an act of vandalism, this really should run through WP:DR. It's supposed to run through DR anyway, but in this case it'd be best to make sure that it goes through the proper channels. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you help Tokyogirl179 (｡◕‿◕｡) Jasperxj (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can anyone help me is there another Admin other than Addshore (talk · contribs) I can make my request to? they don't seem to have been active for a while now, the deletion review page states talking to an Admin should be tried first, and my further investigation it seems that at one point 7 Sarah Prices had been emerged and at the same time Sarah J Price was deleted the American film maker Sarah Price was also proposed for deletion, but someone argued for her case, and her page stayed. however information about the welsh Sarah Price now links to her - I was in Afghanistan at the time of deletion so unable to state a case to keep the page, we are talking someone who's graced the West End stage and been in a films in the USA -thanks again Jasperxj (talk) 01:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC) (｡◕‿◕｡)[reply]

Asif Kamawal

refrences and then click the "Save page" button below -Kamawal0008 (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Deleted under a criteria that is not eligible for uncontroversial undeletion, and quite honestly the information there looked like a hoax. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ensequence

The Company I work for, Ensequence, has been around for greater than 10 years. I'm not sure as to why the page is deleted but I'm trying to reinforced our Wikipedia presence now -50.201.77.2 (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What edits would you make to ensure the article gets accepted? Articles for creation is not for the indefinite housing of material unsuitable for an encyclopedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jeremy - G13 deletes can be restored one time with no questions asked, so no need for you to give 50.201.77.2 a hard time here. Graeme Bartlett (talk)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/North Cascades Conservation Council

I, 97.113.12.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.113.12.116 (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:24, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arnie Suntag

I, 68.98.217.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.98.217.146 (talk) 04:59, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kastner

I, 99.250.146.8, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.250.146.8 (talk) 10:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Hoban

It was originally deleted as "However, Patrick Hoban has still not received significant coverage or played in a fully pro league". Well he has now played two full seasons in the Irish league and has just won the Irish league cup. He was also named in the team of the year last year. These were referenced -The Irish Phantom (talk) 15:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/陈国龙

I, Wkboy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wkboy (talk) 03:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Film Cafe

Because Filmcafe is an film school in India which offers courses of

  • Acting
  • Directing
  • Cinematography
  • Editing
  • Writing
  • Producing

to the fresher who want to get into the Indian film industry. It is founded in 2013. so i do not think that this article must be deleted because it is an valid article. Thank you. -Amberkul (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This article was deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion. It would have to be substantially re-written in order to pass our neutrality guidelines. Even then, I don't really see where this school is ultimately notable enough to merit an entry. It exists (WP:ITEXISTS), but existing is not notability and we cannot keep an article simply because it would be useful (WP:ITSUSEFUL). You can re-write it, but you will have to show how the school has received coverage in independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MR.UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -MR UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR (talk) 05:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC) The purposeof articleis to tell viewer about new event that will be held by Youth Foundation in Indonesia[reply]

This article is very important to tell young generation about annual event that will be held by youth foundation in Indonesia, we do hope you restore it -MR UNIVERSAL AMBASSADOR (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • We don't restore A7 articles, but this article also had issues with promotion as well and could have been deleted under WP:G11. I'll be honest: it's very, very unlikely that this will ever be restored as it was originally written. What also doesn't help is that it doesn't seem like you've ever held an actual pageant so far. The existence of a company, organization, or event does not automatically mean that it passes notability guidelines as existence is not notability. I would suggest that you wait until the event is held and gains substantial coverage in independent and reliable sources. So far I don't really see where the pageant has truly received any in-depth coverage to show that it is ultimately notable enough for an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Padmashree S.N.Swamy

I, 1.39.63.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 1.39.63.221 (talk) 07:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts of No Tomorrow

Reason A9 is wrong: this pages is related to the Avatar (Band) -145.226.158.81 (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done For now. The original deletion as A9 was appropriate, because the band article did not exist at that point (March 2009). The second deletion was because someone created and then blanked it. The original content is nothing more than a track listing, and while we have thousands of articles about albums that are nothing but track listings, they must meet the notability guidelines to begin with. If you provide a review or some other reliable source that could be used to establish notability, we can consider restoring it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Servicetonic

I've found a table comparing Help Desk Software and there was a lack of information, just wanted to update it with a currant contributor "Save page" button below -Fruterman (talk) 14:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Fruterman: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. It's a common mistake perhaps, but articles about companies must meet the inclusion guidelines and lists/comparisons generally only include entries for which Wikipedia already has an article. In any case, there's nothing there to restore - it was half a paragraph of unsourced information. If you want to create an article about the company, you should be using a draft or Articles for Creation. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:13, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danielboyd

New information which makes him more credible and notable. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0006723/ https://www.facebook.com/DanielBoydAuthor 579,000 ghits when you search for "Daniel Boyd author" -14:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Eschaefer2 (talk)

Not done Although the original AFD is quite old, WP:GHITS, self-published sources and Facebook likes are not indicative of notability. I'd suggest creating a draft and submitting it for review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Menyenya high school

I, 41.89.160.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I, 41.89.160.14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)}} i would like to edit the work and bring it to acceptable state -41.89.160.14 (talk) 14:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mediareach Advertising Ltd.

Would like to edit the abandoned page according to the Wikipedia guideline -81.148.89.81 (talk) 15:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/_Ahmad_Ali_Barqi_Azmi

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sarizvi (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zenon Software

In attempting to secure OTRS permission (#2014091510008896, I have been informed that the page that was said to have been copied was actually copied from Freebase, which in turn was taken from Wikipedia (back when the article was in mainspace). If this is true, then it's a clear case of {{backwardscopy}}. -Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 16:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Circe Films

Hey there, I'm completely new to the Wikipedia editing; I tried to contact Alexf a long time, but I couldn't find the page where I could to talk to him... Originally this page was deleted because there was content of promotion of a company placed in the page, I think?

The first problem was that I first made a account that had the company's name CirceFilmsNL, I completely wasn't aware that such pages weren't allowed on Wikipedia, so I made another account; StienetteBosklopper. But then I realised that the name of the new account could also get linked to the company. That's why I made this account, so that I could edit the page on my own name and couldn't be linked with the company, is that illegal?

Back to the main subject; The reason that I want to make a page about this company is that I want to inform what this company is and what they do, not for promotional purposes. I was trying to contact you about how I could make the page to have no promotion in it, how should I formulate the sentences etc? Because I tried to look at other company pages and try to have that on my page.

I hope you will/can help me to get this page online again and hopefully help me to make this page a regular, non illegal one.

Thank you for your time!

Ilia -Ilia932 (talk) 17:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Unless Jimfbleak (who deleted the article) and Alexf (who created the sockpuppet investigation that involves you) are somehow OK with it. You should go over this guideline very carefully in the meantime. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Beasley

We have been correcting errors and making changes, as some of them were made within the last 24 hours. We go in and fix the errors and someone goes behind us and reverses the changes. Kim Beasley's page is not to advertise her or her business. It was put up for people to see can read about her life, where she grew up, where she went to school, and where she has worked and who she has worked for. On top of the successes she has had throughout her career. Can we please get some assistance with this issue? Also can we undo the deletion of the page? Thanks. -Virtualassistexpert (talk) 19:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article was deleted after a discussion and thus it's not eligible for undeletion through here. You'll have to contact the deleting admin Black Kite. Before you do that, please clarify who "we" is. I do note Mcguire2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Kbeasley (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) tag-teamed along with you on this article, and "Virtual Assist" is the name of a company that seems to engage in "social media strategy" or something like that. I might be wrong but I see no disclosure from any of you as required by our conflict of interest guidelines. That would be a good first step. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/1971 (documentary film)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dsvarga (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Dsvarga: On a side note, I do want to encourage you to re-write several parts of the article. Much of it appears to be very close copyvio of the IMDb page. Even if you have permission from the director to use the synopsis, I'd still recommend re-writing it in your own words. Also, I'd recommend looking for more and better sources. One of the sources doesn't really mention the documentary at all while at least one of the others only mentions it in passing. The other two pretty much say the same thing, so some might argue that this doesn't show a true depth of coverage. If you can find some reviews, that would help out immensely. Also, I've moved it to Draft:1971 (documentary film), as we now put AfC submissions under "Draft" headings. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jan vydra

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jvydra1982 (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We noticed that our article was patrolled by the Wiki team and tagged for speedy deletion as it was about a person, the person that it was about is a young business man that was the Australian Young farmer of the year, noted in the Age news print in the top 100 most infulencial people in Melbourne, Victoria.

This person is bring a huge amount of positive change to a stagnant industry and we draft this article to give people further access to his biography. We posted this as a first entry and will be updating over the next 2 days.

We believe that this article is not only supported by credible references but the person is a person of interest and will continue to be a person of interest into the future. Wikipedia has a 1000s of personal bio's including some of Jan Vydra colleagues ; Rob Gell, Max Walker and many more.

Please untag consider untagging this article for deletion.

  • Not done This isn't currently up for deletion at this point. It was up for an WP:A7 speedy (non-notable person) and while that has been declined by another editor, I would recommend editing the article for tone and adding more reliable sources. The article has a fairly promotional bent and could be speedied as spam. Even if it's not, it's still possible for others to seek deletion via WP:AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

europlus sialkot pvt ltd

please create my page and then click the "Save page" button below -Faizanwaqas (talk) 21:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done And won't ever be done. I just blocked your account for block evasion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kaitlyn Fritz

I, Skinfarm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skinfarm (talk) 02:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Section 4 (NYSPHSAA)

The article was received a Speedy. The deciding admin did not even leave a signature to tell us who done it. Two editors, myself and Prisencolinensinainciusol request its restoration. We would defend its notability aggressively in AfD. Hopefully it doesn't need to come to that. Now that I am aware of the situation I can make sure there are sufficient sources to display its notability, as I am currently doing on other equally notable, related sections of the NYSPHSAA. Trackinfo (talk) 07:29, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. According to the deletion log, it was RHaworth (talk · contribs) that deleted the page. An A7 is more a claim that the article did not express why the subject is notable rather than a claim it's not notable, and so A7s are not undeleted since such articles would generally need a fundamental rewrite to explain why the subject is notable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:13, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

பெங்களூர் சிட்டி - எர்ணாகுளம் இன்டர்சிட்டி எக்ஸ்பிரஸ் - Restore request

Hi, This is the Tamil version of the page Bangalore City - Ernakulam Intercity Express. But I don't know how to make other language versions of a English page. I think because of default assignment of this page as English, this was detected as duplicate. So I request you to restore this page as Tamil version of Bangalore City - Ernakulam Intercity Express page and link these two pages. -Karthik (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admins at English Wikipedia have absolutely no powers over pages on other projects (in this case, ta.wp), and if the page requested was made here, we do not restore non-English articles. If the former, please request undeletion at whatever the relevant noticeboard is at ta.wp (likely the WP:Administrators' noticeboard equivalent) or, if that page sees little activity, at meta; if the latter, sorry. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done It was deleted off English Wikipedia, but is not suitable for English. But I have copied the content to this page Please improve the page there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, @Graeme Bartlett, I formatted that link so the page won't scroll horizontally. Protonk (talk) 22:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carrapide.com

This article is about one of the most popular website of Senegal, who revolutionnized the web in that country, opening to new opportunities and legalizing a whole industy of Senegalese film distribution -Assane101 (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mesut Kurtis

The deleted page is Mesut Kurtis. He is a Macedonian of Turkish origins singer who has three music albums and sings in Arabic, English, and Turkish. He has a Wiki page in Arabic and Turkish and he has 798,000 results on google (in English only). His albums are being sold on itunes and Amazon.com, and he is giving concerts in France and UK in October 2014. Last music clip was featuring artist Maher Zain. Why is his page prevented from creation again then?

Please note that the administrator who protected the page on wiki is no longer available here. -Halslomy (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Halslomy: The page was prevented from recreation because it was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesut Kurtis), and recreated multiple times after that, and one of the recreations included copyright infringement. The page was protected from recreation to prevent further similar disruption.
I'm willing to grant that this person has attained notability since the deletion of the article in 2008. Would you please explain exactly what criteria in WP:MUSICBIO is met by this artist?
The deleted article was unsourced, only 6 sentences long, and contained promotional fluff, It would be subject to speedy deletion in that form. It would be best to start it from scratch. I can unprotect the page if you're willing to write the article, but I do not see a need to restore the deleted version. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done, yet. It was protected because the article was restored multiple times (once as a copyright violation). Can you point me to a few sources which cover the subject in sufficient depth? It doesn't matter if they're not in english just so long as they're reliable and independent from the subject (e.g. a biographical article or an article which covers the singer and not just their albums. If we can get some sources together I don't have a problem removing the protection or potentially restoring the page. Protonk (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    As I stated above, I don't object to unprotecting the page if it can be demonstrated that the artist now meets WP:MUSICBIO, but the deleted versions are unsourced G11 material and should not be restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Well sure. I'm not an idiot. :) Were I to restore the page I'd just leave those revisions deleted. Protonk (talk) 14:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello all, I'm the admin who deleted the copyvio iteration of the page. I have no opinion or knowledge one way or the other on Mesur Kurtis, just noting that my deletion was simply procedural. Best, faithless (speak) 22:52, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Rest (band)

The Rest (band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Template added for Ianmj. Protonk (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pankaj ajrawer

This is very important for me because my microsoft verified certification link with this and helpfull for me for related to my job and work -Pandit pankaj (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Based on requestor's talk page, probably actually referring to Pankaj sharma haryana which was deleted per CSD A7 and G11. --Finngall talk 15:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. No page by the requested name has ever existed, and the article Pankaj sharma haryana is ineligible for restoration by request because it was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and WP:CSD#G11. Also, the requester has not provided a valid rationale for restoration; any personal benefit from the existence of this article is emphatically not an argument for restoration. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph W. Belluck

I, Rcpadgett, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rcpadgett (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dynasty (Hip Hop Artist)

I, Dreampusher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dreampusher (talk) 16:50, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Last Year

I, Unitednut, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unitednut (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to have it restored since the band will be relasing new material shortly and I plan to edit re-submit the entry

Shloime Gertner

The page was deleted in March 2010 because it did not explain the subject's notability. I have written a new article with reliable sourcing and verification of notability. Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC) -Yoninah (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Yoninah: I have removed the create protection to make way for you to recreate the article but I have not restored the article in its previous state lest it be speedily deleted again. Once you have recreated it, ping me and I can restore the contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, new article looks good, prior deleted history restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 00:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Movim

Movim is an important XMPP based upcoming decentralised social networks. Links are being added as references to its wiki page as data on it increases on the net. Having it's wiki page undeleted would be very helpful, thanks -Vanya (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Akash Rajpal

I, Akneal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Akneal (talk) 11:10, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel

Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, (Template:Lang-de) (9 May 1814, in Copenhagen, Kingdom of Denmark – 28 July 1895, at Schloss Hohenburg in Lenggries, Kingdom of Bavaria) was a member of the House of Hesse-Kassel by birth. Through her marriage to Prince Frederick Augustus of Anhalt-Dessau, Marie Luise Charlotte was also a member of the House of Ascania and a Princess of Anhalt-Dessau. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afriallifuld2550 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 10 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The requestor didn't link to the article in question, but I guess that it refers to Landgravine Marie Louise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, Landgravine Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel, and hence to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel (which the OP tried to blank), and to Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel (recently re-created after deletion). --David Biddulph (talk) 12:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article is now at Draft:Princess Marie Luise Charlotte of Hesse-Kassel. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Ferry

I, Jill Haigh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jill Haigh (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jean Po/sandbox2

I, Jean Po, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jean Po (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to get the history of this page back.

--Jean Po (talk) 16:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norma Foster

I have just started to write this and it is a draft. I moved it to the sandbox "Save page" button below -Wadokata (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Please note that stickyprods cannot be undeleted here unless you provide a source. I will confirm that the article is at User:Wadokata/sandbox, but it still is absent sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grabcart.com

I have read your policy and understand it. The content I posted was not an advertisement but just information about the website. We would like to know why it was removed and request for it to be posted back up please. -Jennytomkins (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. "Just information about the website" means that the article existed for publicity purposes, which is prohibited. Also subjective wording like "wide selection" are certainly promotional. In addition, there was no evidence that the company is notable enough to meet WP:CORP criteria for inclusion, because the article cited zero independent reliable sources whatsoever, making it eligible for speedy deletion in accordance with WP:CSD#A7.
Furthermore, your use of "we" implies that you have a conflict of interest that you have not disclosed, as you agreed to do when you agreed to the Terms of Service when registering your account. Please read WP:COI and abide by it. You may try to submit your article again using the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. But it will not be restored to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Losing Joe's Place (novel)

I forgot about the article but I believe that it did indeed have merit because most of the other books by the same person have been articled on Wikipedia, which is the free encyclopedia about EVERYTHING, and this award winning book has not yet been. -208.99.128.46 (talk) 00:09, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • On a side note, I do want to caution you about a few things. First off, the existence of other articles on Wikipedia (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) does not automatically mean that all books pass notability guidelines. There have actually been a few AfDs recently for some of Korman's other books, so the argument that because Korman's other books have pages doesn't really hold water. Also, I note that you included a link to Goodreads in the reception section. Please understand that Goodreads is not usable as a reliable source and any reviews on that site should not be placed anywhere in an article. Basically, the site is considered to be a social media site for books and because anyone can sign up and review, it's not usable as a reliable source because it's ultimately self-published. The Wordpress blog review falls under the same lines, as did the Allreaders review. Also, please be aware that the publisher link is considered a WP:PRIMARY source and cannot give notability. Other than that, you do need to state what award the book has won. Not all awards are considered equal and while some awards can give absolute notability (meaning we keep on that basis alone, like a Caldecott Medal) other awards can only give partial notability (akin to a review in a reliable source) while most others give no notability at all. I'm assuming that the award mentioned is the YALSA listing, which can give some notability but not absolute notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, the TeenInk review isn't usable either. If they're published in their magazine we can use them since they do have some editorial oversight, but other than that the site is pretty much one where anyone can submit a review. We can't guarantee that every review and article on that site is edited due to the amount that they publish, but from what I've seen it appears that the ones that are published in their magazine are so we can use those. I used to use the site as a RS myself, but I've had people raise some serious questions about the editorial guidelines on that site so I've stopped using them as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've done some general cleaning and so far it's pretty weak. I couldn't really find that much out there to show notability, so you will still have to dig pretty heavily for sources. If you can find the link to the SLJ's review then that would help, as the link in the article went to the Horn Book Guide. They're owned by the same people, but they're not considered the same publication when it comes to what they review and so on. I've also moved this to Draft:Losing Joe's Place to fit our new AfC name conventions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arise (musician)

The article was currently being worked on to meet Wikipedia's expectations. New sources were added and the biography was edited and polished. Please, please restore the page of this exceptional young talent so that I may work on it. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.86.178 (talk) 00:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Deor (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karina Ivanova

I, 107.211.104.44, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 107.211.104.44 (talk) 09:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cem Sertoglu

I, VCanalyst, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VCanalyst (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC) wouldlike to get the page back for editing[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RadView Software

I, AAriel42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AAriel42 (talk) 08:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


We'd like to improve the article and provide more reliable references. thanks.

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Your user id should represent one person. Do not let other use your logon, They can register themselves instead of using your account. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RadView Software

I, AAriel42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AAriel42 (talk) 10:05, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@AAriel42: already  Done half an hour ago, see above. JohnCD (talk) 10:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kevin L. Walker

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Milesyarbra (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tha Boogiewoogie Man

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 76.219.224.195 (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Around (disambiguation)

This was probably a redirect to the Around disambiguation page, but was deleted when that was redirected to an article; a valid disambiguation page now exists for it to redirect to. -86.130.209.39 (talk) 19:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Cheng

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hiddenemotions (talk) 02:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a reason for why it was being deleted. The reason given was that " I am closing this because no more discussion seems to be forthcoming" That does not make sense because there is constant new information for this Hong Kong singer and actor and updating his music career and tv shows.

 Done. The closing admin deemed the deletion equivalent to a WP:PROD deletion, meaning it can be restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elie Khouri

I, Csamer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I'd like to contribute more links and content to the subject -Csamer (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Highlands School main entrance.JPG

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vhk10 (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC) I am the copyright owner of the image and can edit its licensing status if it is restored.[reply]

@Vhk10:  Not done - there is already File:Highlands School, Tilehurst, main entrance.jpg which seems to be the same image, but the right way up; do you need both? JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell

I, Smitty48823, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smitty48823 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Smitty48823: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alfred Buxton

I, Zohre6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zohre6 (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Zohre6: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Springer (Musician)

This article is based on true information and enough sources. Wikipedia don't cares. You just delete every page without any reason its like wasting time on Wikipedia when you delete articles i want my article back please. -175.110.114.141 (talk) 16:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Springer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luiz Gohara

Deleted by admin without discussion om whether the article was notable or not. -Yankees10 21:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

7 Angels 7 Plagues

Requesting that page be Userfied. This went through a not-very-thorough AfD recently, and I have located additional sources (e.g.,[5] and [6]) that may be useful for rewriting the article to pass WP:MUSIC. -Chubbles (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No objection in principle, but that really needs agreement from the closing admin, who I will ping - Joe Decker. JohnCD (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note, Mr. Decker has not edited in 6 days. Is his permission necessary? There is another AfD, for an album of the band's, which may hang in the balance based on whether I can salvage the band article. Chubbles (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ted the slug

ted the slug is a fictional character of which was in a recent play, the slug hound, i have referenced this page in the brochur "Save page" button below -The mighty jimbat (talk) 10:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The article will not be restored, as it adds no value to the Wikipedia project. It was deleted as vandalism. Please see Wikipedia:Golden rule to get a better understanding of what is required in an encyclopedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norlan Brequillo

I'm sorry for posting my details i will fix it -Norlan245 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. More advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tieto TRIP

I, VAV100, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VAV100 (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contingent Network Services

I, 66.195.135.152, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.195.135.152 (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Tank Guitar

It was a soft delete that lacked discussion. The article facilitated all aspect necessary for notoriety, including: unique musical invention used on many albums released by record labels and contain footnotes to articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't how we determine notability. We require multiple references from reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth, are not tied to the subject in any way, and which have editorial oversight. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It Was totally notable for many years on Wiki and now it's not? How does that happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the presence of the successful AfD and the fact that the sole !vote states the sources they found for it were wanting, calling it "totally notable" is a stretch. The reality is that there's only about 1000 active admins to curate 5,000,000+ articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What sources were not credible? To which ones do you refer? There were several. And how is a source a stretch? Isn't "stretch" subjective term? I mean you said, "discuss the subject in depth" what does that entail specifically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A source is considered reliable if it meets all of the following criteria: (1) It isn't from the subject or a company that owns the subject (if not a person or group), (2) it's not from someone who has a financial, professional/business, or social connection to the subject, (3) it spends at least a paragraph, preferably much more, talking about what the subject is, (4) it has editorial oversight, i.e. an editorial board that fact-checks.
As I'm not an administrator myself (I would have actioned this request if I were) I have no way of knowing what the sources are or their reliability. You would have to ask the !voter (Joe Decker (talk · contribs)) themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) The sources were ISBN 9780946719952 and http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html (which has apparently changed over the years so it doesn't mention the subject). The book looks like an autobiography of Chris Connelly but I don't have a preview so I can't tell much else. IMO there's not much indication that the subject is notable, but I haven't done a thorough search. Protonk (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are we to do? I don’t understand how you can delete it without researching the Connely book where it is discussed. Also you are saying that it is not longer a part of history because the web sources have changed? How much of the world will be lost because of this? This instrument was notable 25 years ago. Yes many of the websites that referred to it are gone. So is it no longer notable?

The New York times maybe a short mention but it was mentioned because it was notable.

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/21/arts/review-rock-music-of-the-1990-s-served-60-s-style.html

Was the Sonic Boom review still not enough? You said it doesn't mention it but it does!!!


http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html

Other mentions.

http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10529470 http://www.intelligentmachinery.net/?page_id=133 http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=590110&blogcode=10303129 http://lensrecords.bandcamp.com/album/mantras http://apexarmouries.bigcartel.com/product/lab-report-classical-atmospheres-self-released http://www.chaindlk.com/reviews/?id=5119 http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10384778 http://ghostboxradio.blogspot.com/2014/09/lab-report-terminal-released-1995-lab.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwz_9zq5Wjw http://www.allacronyms.com/A.T.G./Anti_Tank_Guitar http://acronymsandslang.com/acronym_image/1767/d6802382bcc6f941eff3cb7e7255e043.jpg http://www.thefullwiki.org/Anti_Tank_Guitar

I understand you can’t refer to his sites but… http://matthewschultz.wix.com/antitankguitar#!instruments/cjg9 http://www.mattschultz.com/ http://www.labreport.com/ Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the info! I appreciate your time. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) I still think it's a valid article. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also..if you Google Anti Tank Guitar you actually can see a sandbox by Rudolph Steiner who built a page on Wiki for the instrument. THAT'S how many people have searched the Instrument. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. The AFD closed as a WP:SOFTDELETE, meaning it's not much different than a WP:PROD, therefore it's the type of thing that can be restored on request. However, it needs to be improved or it will likely get deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:JuvonTaylor

I am Juvon Taylor, and I'm a singer songwriter from Toronto, ON .. listen here www.soundcloud.com/juvontaylor or www.youtube.com/jayteeus, My page should not be deleted. I am very angry about this, I am a real person. "Save page" button below -JuvonTaylor (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't permit ANYONE to use Wikipedia for advertisement, and we routinely block accounts that have a pretty severe conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves - see Wikipedia is not about YOU. The use of Wikipedia user pages is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Libre

Useful knowledge lost. The page has become a disambiguation page but the original page is not listed. The original history has been replaced (so is also lost). Reason for deletion in deletion log: "2014-10-12T19:02:51 Frank (talk contribs) deleted page Libre (G6: Deleted to make way for move)". Where was it moved to? I suggest reinstating the page Libre as it was with all its history and talk before the deletion, and creating a page called "Libre (disambiguation)" for the current content. In that page, link to the reinstated page "Libre" with a note something like "(common usage)" or "(usage in free culture)". Alternatively, move the deleted page (and all its history) into one of those two names - i.e. into "Libre (common usage)" or "Libre (usage in free culture)". Thanks - kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC) -kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was deleted basically as a result of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Libre. The original decision was to redirect the page to a disambiguation page but someone noticed that "Libre" is a better title, so the content of the disambiguation page was moved over the original article. Protonk (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Is it possible to get a copy of the page just before it was deleted?
      • I am interested in the content, history (for attribution purposes) and external links that were on the page (especially the references), and might (if I have time) work on it to make it worthy of being reinstated, perhaps under some other name or elsewhere (Wikiversity, WikiEducator, ...), and/or to make sure that nothing important has been lost (i.e. not covered in related articles). - kt (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I have userfied it to User:KTucker/Libre. I do have to say that this AFD is hardly binding on the status of this article. It was a non-admin closure with two !votes for delete and one for merge. I fully agree that there needs to be an article there ... if we have Gratis versus libre, it makes sense to have articles on those two topics. --B (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks B. Knowing how much work went into the page, especially by User:Sanglorian in 2012, and the reasons for making the effort, it is good to have a version with history somewhere. Personally, I would vote to have the page re-instated alongside a separate "Libre (disambiguation)" page, then more people will find it and help improve the article. - K (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Masuda Moyeen (মাসউদা মঈন), a writer with only primary education.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -119.148.6.206 (talk) 08:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice and note the need for references to reliable sources such as newspaper reviews - the subject's Facebook page is not enough. Non-English passages need to be translated. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Leadership

I, Agratia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Agratia (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been deleted, because the submission hasn't been edited for over 6 month. I am now ready to edit it according to the requirements. Thank you -Agratia (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitochondrial gene replacement

I, Sotaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sotaj (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wahid Kassana

hey! There i am not write wrong information so please don't delete my page -Gree123 (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The article isn't deleted (yet), but if it is, the reason for deletion (WP:CSD#A7) would make it ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You would have to talk to the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Voice Organization

This page was deleted by user Rjd0060 with three reasons given: No notability, No citations, and Nothing verifiable. The second two reasons are correctable with editing and therefore are not reason for deletion. As for notability: Within the ecosystem of left groupings in the United States the Communist Voice Organization is one of several communist trends which originated during the 1960's, developed under a series of different names, and which continues to exist today. Communist Voice Organization has existed in its current form since 1996, or 18 years. The Communist Voice Organization is alone in its theoretical opposition to Stalin, Mao and Trotsky, while supporting Marx and Lenin. As a result, the Communist Voice Organization takes unique stands on many political questions, and has amassed a large body of theoretical material on their website applying this theoretical position to numerous political issues which arose during the last 18 years, as well as numerous historical questions such as how to understand the development and fall of the former Soviet Union. For these reasons, a page on this organization is useful for researchers studying the United States left ecosystem today. Furthermore, a Google search reveals that 37 other Wikipedia articles reference the organization, and a Google search that is not limited to Wikipedia, but which excludes the Communist Voice Organization's own website: -site:communist voice.org "communist voice organization" results in 56,000 hits. -Ejrd1993 (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ejrd1993: I think you misunderstand what "notability" means. It doesn't mean unique. It doesn't have anything to do with the material they've amassed. In Wikipedia terms, Wikipedia:Notability (and for organizations in particular, WP:CORP) means that the organization has received significant coverage (not trivial mentions or directory listings) in reliable sources (not blogs or press releases) that are independent (not associated with) the organization. If you cannot address these concerns, the article will likely be deleted again. For the time being, I have restored it as an expired WP:PROD ~Amatulić (talk) 20:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peppur/sandbox

I, Peppur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peppur (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I've gotten assistance and I'm ready to update the errors I have with my references and would like to complete the page.

Thank you!

Peppur Chambers Brown Betties

Draft:New Zealand Field Archery Association

I, 49.224.80.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 49.224.80.6 (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Baritulem Pidomson

I, Pastoruzor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pastoruzor (talk) 20:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xtreme Chaotix

I, SG Ultima, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SG Ultima (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still Work in Progress, attempting to address issues impeding publication on wikipedia. -SG Ultima (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bruno vandevelde/Victor gilsoul

I, Bruno vandevelde, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bruno vandevelde (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the submission to Draft:Victor Gilsoul, as we've changed how we name our draft submissions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wavemill

I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC) I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@VDNavarro: I almost didn't restore it due to the very promotional tone in the article, but this does seem like it could be notable. I'd recommend re-writing portions of it substantially before resubmitting this. I've also moved it to Draft:Wavemill per our draft naming conventions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

abdchaudhary

I, Abdchaudhary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abdchaudhary (talk) 11:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @Abdchaudhary: There has never been any page at that title. Looking at your deleted contributions, did you mean User:Abdchaudhary/sandbox? If so, there's nothing to restore there. The only "content" you ever added to that page was a section header i.e., the sole content was "== Maulana Hamidullah Chaudhary ==" If you want to create a page about that individual (though the fact that the surname is the same as yours makes me think you have a conflict of interest and shouldn't be creating such a page at all) there's no need to restore a blank sandbox. It can just be created anew, this time with actual content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delong Padung

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -WikiCreator1995 (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq News

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jwj335 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

creation/Captain Brock: Space Badger

==

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Derrin Tanser (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=629862574"