Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CanerVeli (talk | contribs) at 11:40, 20 October 2014 (→liquiproof: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Sarah J Price

is a Welsh Playwright, film maker TV, Film and West End actor, reality star, musician, sports journalist, comedy writer and stand up performer, (Edinburgh festival, NYC Comedy club) and regular international radio and TV guest. the page was originally merged with two other Sarah Price's in an act of vandalism, the swimmer was separated, but the two 'film' Sarah Price's remained as one, my attempt to get the page back up and running on its own was removed, the main reason given for its deletion being "I found lots of Sarah Prices, but not this one" the problem being because of Ms Price's varied career a fair few of the 'lots of Sarah Price's' were indeed her, she has also worked under several stage names since she began her career in early childhood. her recent output as an actor I feel merits the page to be reinstated and updated. -Jasperxj (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2014 (UTC) Jasperxj (talk)[reply]

  • This ran through AfD and since you're saying that there were other sources and that she was merged with other Prices as an act of vandalism, this really should run through WP:DR. It's supposed to run through DR anyway, but in this case it'd be best to make sure that it goes through the proper channels. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:23, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you help Tokyogirl179 (｡◕‿◕｡) Jasperxj (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can anyone help me is there another Admin other than Addshore (talk · contribs) I can make my request to? they don't seem to have been active for a while now, the deletion review page states talking to an Admin should be tried first, and my further investigation it seems that at one point 7 Sarah Prices had been emerged and at the same time Sarah J Price was deleted the American film maker Sarah Price was also proposed for deletion, but someone argued for her case, and her page stayed. however information about the welsh Sarah Price now links to her - I was in Afghanistan at the time of deletion so unable to state a case to keep the page, we are talking someone who's graced the West End stage and been in a films in the USA -thanks again Jasperxj (talk) 01:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC) (｡◕‿◕｡)[reply]

Hi again, still getting no reply from Addshore (talk · contribs) or help from anyone else i have found there is a page in someones sandbox (User:Toyahfan) which merged with the original page which was deleted and the new information now available about Sarah Price a 'more' valued entry could be created, I could start again, but fear it would be deleted as a matter of course. Please someone help! Cheers Jasperxj (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Addshore isn't responding, then it's time to take the case to WP:DRV. The deleted article is about football writer, musician, and comedian. Is that the same person? If not, it would be best to start from scratch. Or, I could restore the article to your user space for you to improve. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jasperxj:, @Amatulic: Userfying it would probably be a good idea, although I'd still recommend maybe running it through DRV just to be safe, since there were a few people who brought up that these were all different Prices. I'm just slightly worried that someone might speedy it thinking that this would be the case (that they're all separate) and that the deletion rationale hadn't been resolved. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tha Boogiewoogie Man

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 76.219.224.195 (talk) 18:28, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Cheng

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hiddenemotions (talk) 02:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a reason for why it was being deleted. The reason given was that " I am closing this because no more discussion seems to be forthcoming" That does not make sense because there is constant new information for this Hong Kong singer and actor and updating his music career and tv shows.

 Done. The closing admin deemed the deletion equivalent to a WP:PROD deletion, meaning it can be restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:10, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elie Khouri

I, Csamer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I'd like to contribute more links and content to the subject -Csamer (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Highlands School main entrance.JPG

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vhk10 (talk) 12:49, 13 October 2014 (UTC) I am the copyright owner of the image and can edit its licensing status if it is restored.[reply]

@Vhk10:  Not done - there is already File:Highlands School, Tilehurst, main entrance.jpg which seems to be the same image, but the right way up; do you need both? JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell

I, Smitty48823, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smitty48823 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Smitty48823: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alfred Buxton

I, Zohre6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zohre6 (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Zohre6: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Springer (Musician)

This article is based on true information and enough sources. Wikipedia don't cares. You just delete every page without any reason its like wasting time on Wikipedia when you delete articles i want my article back please. -175.110.114.141 (talk) 16:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Springer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:53, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Luiz Gohara

Deleted by admin without discussion om whether the article was notable or not. -Yankees10 21:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

7 Angels 7 Plagues

Requesting that page be Userfied. This went through a not-very-thorough AfD recently, and I have located additional sources (e.g.,[1] and [2]) that may be useful for rewriting the article to pass WP:MUSIC. -Chubbles (talk) 01:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No objection in principle, but that really needs agreement from the closing admin, who I will ping - Joe Decker. JohnCD (talk) 14:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note, Mr. Decker has not edited in 6 days. Is his permission necessary? There is another AfD, for an album of the band's, which may hang in the balance based on whether I can salvage the band article. Chubbles (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not to be a bother, but time is somewhat of the essence on my ability to rework this article, if I wish to influence the pending AfD. If it is possible to userfy the article soon, I'd be appreciative. Chubbles (talk) 20:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Chubbles: OK,  Done to User:Chubbles/7 Angels 7 Plagues, but check with Joe Decker, or go through WP:DRV, before you restore it to mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ted the slug

ted the slug is a fictional character of which was in a recent play, the slug hound, i have referenced this page in the brochur "Save page" button below -The mighty jimbat (talk) 10:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The article will not be restored, as it adds no value to the Wikipedia project. It was deleted as vandalism. Please see Wikipedia:Golden rule to get a better understanding of what is required in an encyclopedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Norlan Brequillo

I'm sorry for posting my details i will fix it -Norlan245 (talk) 11:07, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. More advice on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 14:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tieto TRIP

I, VAV100, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VAV100 (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contingent Network Services

I, 66.195.135.152, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.195.135.152 (talk) 17:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Tank Guitar

It was a soft delete that lacked discussion. The article facilitated all aspect necessary for notoriety, including: unique musical invention used on many albums released by record labels and contain footnotes to articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't how we determine notability. We require multiple references from reliable sources that discuss the subject in depth, are not tied to the subject in any way, and which have editorial oversight. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It Was totally notable for many years on Wiki and now it's not? How does that happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given the presence of the successful AfD and the fact that the sole !vote states the sources they found for it were wanting, calling it "totally notable" is a stretch. The reality is that there's only about 1000 active admins to curate 5,000,000+ articles. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What sources were not credible? To which ones do you refer? There were several. And how is a source a stretch? Isn't "stretch" subjective term? I mean you said, "discuss the subject in depth" what does that entail specifically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Tose Brian (talk • contribs) 20:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A source is considered reliable if it meets all of the following criteria: (1) It isn't from the subject or a company that owns the subject (if not a person or group), (2) it's not from someone who has a financial, professional/business, or social connection to the subject, (3) it spends at least a paragraph, preferably much more, talking about what the subject is, (4) it has editorial oversight, i.e. an editorial board that fact-checks.
As I'm not an administrator myself (I would have actioned this request if I were) I have no way of knowing what the sources are or their reliability. You would have to ask the !voter (Joe Decker (talk · contribs)) themselves. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) The sources were ISBN 9780946719952 and http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html (which has apparently changed over the years so it doesn't mention the subject). The book looks like an autobiography of Chris Connelly but I don't have a preview so I can't tell much else. IMO there's not much indication that the subject is notable, but I haven't done a thorough search. Protonk (talk) 20:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are we to do? I don’t understand how you can delete it without researching the Connely book where it is discussed. Also you are saying that it is not longer a part of history because the web sources have changed? How much of the world will be lost because of this? This instrument was notable 25 years ago. Yes many of the websites that referred to it are gone. So is it no longer notable?

The New York times maybe a short mention but it was mentioned because it was notable.

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/12/21/arts/review-rock-music-of-the-1990-s-served-60-s-style.html

Was the Sonic Boom review still not enough? You said it doesn't mention it but it does!!!


http://www.sonic-boom.com/review/lab.report-1.html

Other mentions.

http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10529470 http://www.intelligentmachinery.net/?page_id=133 http://israblog.nana10.co.il/blogread.asp?blog=590110&blogcode=10303129 http://lensrecords.bandcamp.com/album/mantras http://apexarmouries.bigcartel.com/product/lab-report-classical-atmospheres-self-released http://www.chaindlk.com/reviews/?id=5119 http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/10384778 http://ghostboxradio.blogspot.com/2014/09/lab-report-terminal-released-1995-lab.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mwz_9zq5Wjw http://www.allacronyms.com/A.T.G./Anti_Tank_Guitar http://acronymsandslang.com/acronym_image/1767/d6802382bcc6f941eff3cb7e7255e043.jpg http://www.thefullwiki.org/Anti_Tank_Guitar

I understand you can’t refer to his sites but… http://matthewschultz.wix.com/antitankguitar#!instruments/cjg9 http://www.mattschultz.com/ http://www.labreport.com/ Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the info! I appreciate your time. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC) I still think it's a valid article. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also..if you Google Anti Tank Guitar you actually can see a sandbox by Rudolph Steiner who built a page on Wiki for the instrument. THAT'S how many people have searched the Instrument. Eric Tose Brian (talk) 23:55, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. The AFD closed as a WP:SOFTDELETE, meaning it's not much different than a WP:PROD, therefore it's the type of thing that can be restored on request. However, it needs to be improved or it will likely get deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:JuvonTaylor

I am Juvon Taylor, and I'm a singer songwriter from Toronto, ON .. listen here www.soundcloud.com/juvontaylor or www.youtube.com/jayteeus, My page should not be deleted. I am very angry about this, I am a real person. "Save page" button below -JuvonTaylor (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't permit ANYONE to use Wikipedia for advertisement, and we routinely block accounts that have a pretty severe conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves - see Wikipedia is not about YOU. The use of Wikipedia user pages is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Libre

Useful knowledge lost. The page has become a disambiguation page but the original page is not listed. The original history has been replaced (so is also lost). Reason for deletion in deletion log: "2014-10-12T19:02:51 Frank (talk contribs) deleted page Libre (G6: Deleted to make way for move)". Where was it moved to? I suggest reinstating the page Libre as it was with all its history and talk before the deletion, and creating a page called "Libre (disambiguation)" for the current content. In that page, link to the reinstated page "Libre" with a note something like "(common usage)" or "(usage in free culture)". Alternatively, move the deleted page (and all its history) into one of those two names - i.e. into "Libre (common usage)" or "Libre (usage in free culture)". Thanks - kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC) -kt (talk) 00:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was deleted basically as a result of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Libre. The original decision was to redirect the page to a disambiguation page but someone noticed that "Libre" is a better title, so the content of the disambiguation page was moved over the original article. Protonk (talk) 00:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Is it possible to get a copy of the page just before it was deleted?
      • I am interested in the content, history (for attribution purposes) and external links that were on the page (especially the references), and might (if I have time) work on it to make it worthy of being reinstated, perhaps under some other name or elsewhere (Wikiversity, WikiEducator, ...), and/or to make sure that nothing important has been lost (i.e. not covered in related articles). - kt (talk) 22:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I have userfied it to User:KTucker/Libre. I do have to say that this AFD is hardly binding on the status of this article. It was a non-admin closure with two !votes for delete and one for merge. I fully agree that there needs to be an article there ... if we have Gratis versus libre, it makes sense to have articles on those two topics. --B (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks B. Knowing how much work went into the page, especially by User:Sanglorian in 2012, and the reasons for making the effort, it is good to have a version with history somewhere. Personally, I would vote to have the page re-instated alongside a separate "Libre (disambiguation)" page, then more people will find it and help improve the article. - K (talk) 10:25, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion initiated here to improve the article, starting with points addressing the reasons for deletion and in support of undeletion. --K (talk) 07:45, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Masuda Moyeen (মাসউদা মঈন), a writer with only primary education.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -119.148.6.206 (talk) 08:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Read WP:Your first article for advice and note the need for references to reliable sources such as newspaper reviews - the subject's Facebook page is not enough. Non-English passages need to be translated. JohnCD (talk) 09:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eco-Leadership

I, Agratia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Agratia (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been deleted, because the submission hasn't been edited for over 6 month. I am now ready to edit it according to the requirements. Thank you -Agratia (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:08, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mitochondrial gene replacement

I, Sotaj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sotaj (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wahid Kassana

hey! There i am not write wrong information so please don't delete my page -Gree123 (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The article isn't deleted (yet), but if it is, the reason for deletion (WP:CSD#A7) would make it ineligible for restoration by request on this page. You would have to talk to the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Voice Organization

This page was deleted by user Rjd0060 with three reasons given: No notability, No citations, and Nothing verifiable. The second two reasons are correctable with editing and therefore are not reason for deletion. As for notability: Within the ecosystem of left groupings in the United States the Communist Voice Organization is one of several communist trends which originated during the 1960's, developed under a series of different names, and which continues to exist today. Communist Voice Organization has existed in its current form since 1996, or 18 years. The Communist Voice Organization is alone in its theoretical opposition to Stalin, Mao and Trotsky, while supporting Marx and Lenin. As a result, the Communist Voice Organization takes unique stands on many political questions, and has amassed a large body of theoretical material on their website applying this theoretical position to numerous political issues which arose during the last 18 years, as well as numerous historical questions such as how to understand the development and fall of the former Soviet Union. For these reasons, a page on this organization is useful for researchers studying the United States left ecosystem today. Furthermore, a Google search reveals that 37 other Wikipedia articles reference the organization, and a Google search that is not limited to Wikipedia, but which excludes the Communist Voice Organization's own website: -site:communist voice.org "communist voice organization" results in 56,000 hits. -Ejrd1993 (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ejrd1993: I think you misunderstand what "notability" means. It doesn't mean unique. It doesn't have anything to do with the material they've amassed. In Wikipedia terms, Wikipedia:Notability (and for organizations in particular, WP:CORP) means that the organization has received significant coverage (not trivial mentions or directory listings) in reliable sources (not blogs or press releases) that are independent (not associated with) the organization. If you cannot address these concerns, the article will likely be deleted again. For the time being, I have restored it as an expired WP:PROD ~Amatulić (talk) 20:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peppur/sandbox

I, Peppur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peppur (talk) 18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I've gotten assistance and I'm ready to update the errors I have with my references and would like to complete the page.

Thank you!

Peppur Chambers Brown Betties

Draft:New Zealand Field Archery Association

I, 49.224.80.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 49.224.80.6 (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Baritulem Pidomson

I, Pastoruzor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pastoruzor (talk) 20:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xtreme Chaotix

I, SG Ultima, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SG Ultima (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still Work in Progress, attempting to address issues impeding publication on wikipedia. -SG Ultima (talk) 01:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • @SG Ultima: I notice that you requested that this get restored back in April, but you did not touch the submission at all. I'd like to have some reassurance that you will edit the article this go round rather than for it to sit and stagnate for another six months and then get deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SG Ultima: Please give me some indication that you will edit this by responding to this post! The problem is that I'm afraid that this will only sit around again and as Wikipedia is not a WP:WEBHOST to indefinitely host material, I'd like some reassurance that you will work on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done Since you have not responded to two attempts to ask for reassurance, I have no choice but to assume that you have abandoned your request and would likely not edit the article at all. I'm sorry, but we cannot indefinitely host material on Wikipedia and we'd need at least some assurance that you would edit the article and make it appropriate to add to the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bruno vandevelde/Victor gilsoul

I, Bruno vandevelde, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bruno vandevelde (talk) 07:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the submission to Draft:Victor Gilsoul, as we've changed how we name our draft submissions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wavemill

I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC) I, VDNavarro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VDNavarro (talk) 08:04, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@VDNavarro: I almost didn't restore it due to the very promotional tone in the article, but this does seem like it could be notable. I'd recommend re-writing portions of it substantially before resubmitting this. I've also moved it to Draft:Wavemill per our draft naming conventions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

abdchaudhary

I, Abdchaudhary, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abdchaudhary (talk) 11:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done @Abdchaudhary: There has never been any page at that title. Looking at your deleted contributions, did you mean User:Abdchaudhary/sandbox? If so, there's nothing to restore there. The only "content" you ever added to that page was a section header i.e., the sole content was "== Maulana Hamidullah Chaudhary ==" If you want to create a page about that individual (though the fact that the surname is the same as yours makes me think you have a conflict of interest and shouldn't be creating such a page at all) there's no need to restore a blank sandbox. It can just be created anew, this time with actual content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delong Padung

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -WikiCreator1995 (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done The "article" was only an infobox that looked as if it may have been copied from another page, complete with inappropriate tags. You can recreate this as a draft with some text that also explains what this means and why it is important. IronGargoyle's deletion reasons look wrong, and A3 or A7 could have been used instead. I would suggest that you work on a draft: Draft:Delong Padung instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq News

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jwj335 (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Captain Brock: Space Badger

I, Derrin Tanser, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Derrin Tanser (talk) 15:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


We now have references to add. I would like to edit before re submission. I am not able to see the original article, please could you forward this to me.

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Your user should only be used by one person. If there is more than one of you there, please register other user accounts for them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ACT Foundation

Page needs to be revised and corrected so that it can be published. Please restore it. Thank you. -Lstevensactfdn (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You will need substantial independent references for this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steven_Nistor

I didn't see the deletion notice in time, I would like to go back and add additional sources. -mike (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored as a deleted WP:PROD. I have, however, left the deletion notice on the article, with a new expiration date. If no improvements are made by then, the article will be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dornacilla Drysdale (Peck)

108.180.206.183 (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Language on Vacation: An Olio of Orthographical Oddities

This article about a book was deleted via PROD due to lack of sources establishing notability. Please restore the article, Language on Vacation: An Olio of Orthographical Oddities, and its redirect, Language on Vacation, as I've located several reliable sources for this book. These include contemporary reviews in TIME and Kirkus Reviews, a retrospective review in Word Ways, and several mentions in popular and academic non-fiction literature attesting to the book's historical significance. I'll add these references to the article once it's restored. -Psychonaut (talk) 08:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Psychonaut: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user DreamGuy (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Owais Bhat

This Page Was A True Biography Of An Artist Who Is Representing The Country India At Many Places In The World. Kindly Bring That Back On Wikipedia So That I Can Continue Editing That Page -Owaisbhat (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Owaisbhat: Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not for self-promotion, or any kind of promotion, and writing about yourself here is very strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest. Please use only one account, in order to avoid suspicion of sockpuppetry. JohnCD (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Meguey Baker

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Smokebomb (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AtheistTV

The 'notability' of this television station was 'asserted' and referenced in the article (with references); it is a subsidiary of the American Atheists. Thanks. -THEPROMENADER 16:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done, restored. The article was never proposed or nominated for deletion, and I see no speedy deletion criterion that would apply here, and none are cited in the deletion log. You are correct, it does make a credible claim of significance, contradicting the deletion log reason. I am not sure why it would have been deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Secaucus Home News

To see what was submitted prior and to add content so its not deleted again for (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). -Thenewsboss (talk) 18:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic Hydrogen Power

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -HACNY (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC) Someone wants to delete my article or has on Atomic Hydrogen Power. Otherwise, there is no such article explaining much about the atomic hydrogen welding machine either, or the concepts involved in developing it in the 1920s by GE. My article is composed of mostly quotes from science and trade articles from the creators of atomic hydrogen power including Nobel Prize winner Dr. Langmuir credited with its creation in 1911. The workers that used the atomic hydrogen welder in the 1920s and later, were made to wear heavy equipment and photographic film to measure radiation levels from the technology. Dr. Langmuir is credited with breaking the hydrogen atom in 1911. I am trying to contribute a look at early clean energy technology, and the confusion is why Dr. Langmuir broke the hydrogen atom, and Wikipedia does not want to have an article about that. HACNY (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. You wrote the article in the context of welding, and we already have an article atomic hydrogen welding, which you could have expanded and improved instead of creating a subject fork. That is the only reason why it was deleted. The deletion has nothing to do with your assertion that Wikipedia "does not want to have an article" about what you wrote. The reality is, Wikipedia doesn't want to have two separate articles about essentially the same subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gnuismail/sandbox

I, Gnuismail, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnuismail (talk) 07:00, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done There really isn't anything to restore there, not really. It's ultimately a request for other people to create an article on someone called AAAAA, "a human & alien life form, living more than 6000 years from the birth on the earth". The rest of the page looked like it was all pure original research and I honestly can't see where it could be turned into a workable article for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Monthly Meet (MMM)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -MahavirjainIITB (talk) 13:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The program has been organized by my alma mater since 1996. It is an education institution of international importance and the program has helped alumni connect with the institute holistically for many noble causes. Hope you will reinstate the article. Regards, Mahavir Sohanlal Jain

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal thakkar

I'll redite all thing and want to create a new one pls help me and pls undelete it -Kushal7t (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The page is ineligible for restoration by request here, because it was not only deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 (the subject is not notable), but also WP:CSD#G11 (it was unambiguously promotional).
Also, read Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You should not be writing about yourself on Wikipedia. If you are truly notable, someone will eventually create an article about you. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Air Spray Aviation Ltd.

May not have written the page properly. Would like to try again. The page has information that contributes to the understanding of the topic. -Electra2013 (talk) 16:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zhong

I, Truecollision, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Truecollision (talk) 21:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tonic International

I, Arno66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arno66 (talk) 05:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. you still need to supply reliable independent sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nadya Fatira

this article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the biography and all the news about Nadya Fatira are listed on many Indonesian media -Nadya Fatira (talk) 14:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You should not write about yourself on Wikipedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article, in Indonesian, is a short biography of a singer-songwriter without apparent assertion or demonstration of notability. If the community wishes it to be undeleted I shall not fight over it. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

German Heart Center in Berlin

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hasanovrf (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please restore this page as i intend to work on it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasanovrf (talk • contribs) 17:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. That was not an encyclopedia article, it was an advertisement, written in the first person, the DHZB addressing potential customers: "If you wish to be treated at the DHZB, our specialists will first review your medical history... Unlike many institutions, we have our own guest-house... the hotels offer special discount rates for our patients... " etc. That is not what an encyclopedia is for. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin Heart Center

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hasanovrf (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please make a redirect from page Berlin Heart Center to page German Heart Center in Berlin So our patients can find the official pages of our center! Thank you![reply]

@Hasanovrf:  Not done. The target page has been deleted as a blatant advertisement. Wikipedia is not a place for your centre to post "official pages". As you are connected with the centre, you should not write about it here - please read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

R. BALACHANDAR

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 20:34, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link.In this pdf see the author name R.Balachandar who is same person.[reply]

Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book.

I am R.BALACHANDAR fROM Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers.

CUMINCAD doesnt have copyright because i am author for that article. i have the proof if need i will submit.

If you think that means this gives you the ability to use them as the text of a Wikipedia article, you are wrong. Per the Berne Convention, all works are fully copyrighted regardless of who authored them, unless explicitly disclaimed otherwise. We cannot accept the text even if you're the author, unless you explicitly release it under a free license (See WP:Donating copyrighted materials), and even then that is not a guarantee that it will be used. Also, Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We will never undelete G12 deletions here, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:46, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jeremy you are wrong here, as if the claim for copyright infringement was in error, it can be undeleted. In this case there is a possibility as the author may release it under a free license. However the content is already under an AFD discussion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

balacr3

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link. In this pdf see the author name R.BALACHANDAR who is same person. Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book. I am R.BALACHANDAR from Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers.[reply] 

Cumin Cad & no one doesn’t claim copyright for this because i am the author for that if need i can produce the proof.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Balacr3 (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2014 (UTC) I am same author for http://cumincad.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/caadria2009_161.content.pdf link. In this pdf see the author name R.BALACHANDAR who is same person. Oral presentation was given by me on the research paper titled : ‘ DIGITAL DESIGN ENGINE BASED ON VEDIC SCIENCE’ for the international conference - CAADRIA 2009,YUNTECH UNIVERSITY, Yunlin, Taiwan, also the same has been published in the CAADRIA 2009 year book. I am R.BALACHANDAR from Tamil nadu ,India. I am the Author for both papers.[reply] 

Cumin Cad & no one doesn’t claim copyright for this because i am the author for that if need i can produce the proof.
  • Not done and will not be done I've linked these both together because ultimately these are asking for the same thing to be restored. I'm sorry, but this will not be restored and there are several reasons for this. The first is that there is a concern about copyright. If you want to run a ticket through WP:ORTS showing that you have the copyright and want to give up permission for its use then that's one thing but you cannot just say that you are the author and that you can give us permission. We cannot verify that you are the author just because you said so and there's also another issue: if this was published anywhere then there is an additional problem over who actually owns the paper. I've seen some places require that the author give up all material copyrights to the journal/publisher. You'd have to show ORTS that you own the rights to the material as well. Now even with that issue solved, there is still a big issue over the overall notability of the subject of Astro Vedic Architecture. I cannot see where anyone is talking about this topic other than the author himself, so that is reason in and of itself for me (and other admins) to not want to restore the article. To make matters worse, there are concerns that you may be using Wikipedia as a place to promote this subject, which is also something that would warrant deletion- as is the case at User:Balacr3. I'm not even going to get into the potential WP:SOCKPUPPETRY going on since you appear to be editing from this account and User:RBalachandar without openly stating that you are the same person and giving your reasons for opening two accounts. I'm sorry, but I will not restore this and to be honest there just doesn't seem to be enough notability to warrant a page any time soon. The best place to submit your work would be various journals, not Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also have to give you fair warning: repeatedly adding this to Wikipedia can be seen as spam, which can lead to you getting temporarily or permanently blocked from editing. I would also recommend against requesting that this get restored to the mainspace via this board. You've already been declined once on here and on your talk page- asking repeatedly is very unlikely to get a different response in this situation and could also be seen as spamming. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soft Solutions

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AA5577 (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC) Please note that no promotion or any advertisement is intendant for the article about Soft Solutions that is well know company in Europe and North America. Checking the citation and the brief company business field are objective and from a neutral point of view.[reply]

Please note also that the content does not violate any copyrights and can be published after your verification and approval.

Promotion isn't entirely about intent as it is about wording. However, with two G11s, an A7, and an AfD, it's incredibly unlikely this page will be restored. (Note that this page has never been deleted on the basis of copyright (G12).) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not doneEven the most recent version was an incredibly blatant advertisement, showing no understanding of the problems raised earlier. DGG ( talk ) 22:20, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaguza

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 41.138.212.92 (talk) 07:25, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done I'm sorry, but the entire article was so promotional in tone that you would have to re-write the entire article from scratch in order to remove the promotional material. You can write a new submission at Draft:Jaguza, but it must be neutral in tone and be sourced with independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:09, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lumbini Eye Institute

Lumbini Eye Institute · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions] this page is not self advertisement. I am not involved in this organization at all. My only aim is to recognize this GOVERNMENT organization which has been doing good work for the public. -nirmal (talk) 08:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • As this was originally deleted at AfD, you'd have to ask either User:Michig or User:Jimfbleak if they would restore the article, although deletion review is always an option. The article did have content that could be seen as potentially promotional in tone, plus I did not see where you addressed the issues brought up at AfD of notability. The LEI does seem to exist and they do seem to do very, very good and noble work, but these elements do not automatically mean notability on Wikipedia. You'd have to show that the institute has received coverage in reliable sources like newspapers and the like. These sources do not have to be in English and I would also suggest asking for help at WP:INDIA as far as source location goes, as they can give some very good tips for where to go for sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Product Family Master Plan

I, 77.72.50.12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 77.72.50.12 (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done There was no content to restore. The entire article is comprised of a header entitled "Product Family Master Plan" and the sentence "A PFMP is an ...", and there are no sources or anything else that would make it worth restoring. Feel free to create a new AfC article if you so wish. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Zivorad M. Slavinski

I, Vlad.stojakovic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vlad.stojakovic (talk) 11:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zivorad M. Slavinski

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vlad.stojakovic (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

liquiproof

I'm sorry if you felt I broke the guidelines, it wasn't my intention. Can this page be restored and placed in sandbox please. I wish to ask other non-biased contributors to edit the page etc. Thank you -CanerVeli (talk) 11:40, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=630363322"