User talk:Anupmehra

Anupmehra

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— Usercheck

Status: Offline

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 India–Pakistan border skirmishes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:25:55, 13 October 2014 review of submission by KAndrea16

KAndrea16 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Qadabra Self-Serve (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Anup, so I'm editing the Qadabra Self-Serve page based on this product and I want to know what kind of web content you would consider "notable" or "verifiable" aside from newspapers, journals, scholarly writing...like Facebook is not...but what about Crunchbase? What other kinds of articles, platforms? -KAndrea16 (talk) 13:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@KAndrea16: - Newspapers, magazines, books, journals, etc. that are subjected to editorial oversight and have a reputation of facts-checking and accuracy are considered a reliable source. You may find Wikipedia guide on reliable source examples helpful. Please write in only /in your draft/ what has been published in these sources, in your own words substantially retaining the meaning of the original content, and cite the same source as an inline citation for anyone willing to verify the contents of the draft. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:42, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	A barnstar for you, brother. Tito☸Dutta 17:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KateAtNVC

OK, changed to softblock, since old name implies affilation anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit request

Its a minor typing error you should correct. In "about me" section of your home page change the term "fahter" to "father". Glad to know you! Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirnasir0 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Amirnasir0: -Thank you, fixed it. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Turnberry Isle

They were certainly using the account for advertising purposes, but the warning template doesn't seem to match the nature of the block, which is always indefinite. The main thing is to make sure they understand they still can't advertise even if they use a different name. Deb (talk) 18:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Deb: - Thank you very much for your prompt reply. I'll decline the request at ACC now. Please change the template on the user talk page (/to {{uw-spamublock}}/) asking them a reason for unblock, along with a new username. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Derek McCulloch

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Derek McCulloch. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Difficult to find reference

I tried to find good reference. But there are not any besides interviews in youtube. Will that count for reference? Page: sanjay shrestha nirmal (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Nirmaljoshi: -Unfortunately not. We need sources that have editorial oversight and reputation of facts checking and accuracy, as such national newspapers, magazines, etc. You may find the Wikipedia reliable sources example helpful. I noticed that the article is now nominated for deletion, -so you've around a week to justify the inclusion of the article on Wikipedia. I've left a comment on the deletion discussion page, please follow the instructions to save the article from deletion. If you've some more questions, you want answer for, -you may ask it just below to this post (however, I'm busy these days around, -and I may most probably reply late) or -on help desk linked on top of this page in the 'white box'. Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pratap

Anup did you ask anon for a reference for the aibak information on pratap talk page? It would be in wiki spirit to ask for a reference for what you deleted from the Pratap page. Just my .02 Euro. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brookdeweller (talk • contribs) 13:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brookdeweller -I'm unsure if I did understand your question. May you please elaborate a little your query? If it is about, -'why did I remove a sentence from Maharana Pratap article in my this edit', then the answer is, -because an unsourced claim was challenged by an editor on the article's talk page. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:17, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The unsourced claim should in my opinion be asked to be sourced. Would it be reasonable to put a cite tag on it and wait for public response instead of removing? Best on lights festival.