Jump to content

Talk:Priyanka Chopra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 150.242.17.41 (talk) at 10:50, 1 November 2014 (Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2014: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articlePriyanka Chopra is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 14, 2013.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
October 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed
February 8, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
March 15, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 21, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 23, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

The Move From Celebrity to Ubiquity Lihaas (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Just reduced the url. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

Can we, for God's sake, have a consensus on the infobox image and stick to it? Almost everytime I visit the article there is a new infobox image, which is completely unnecessary as nothing was wrong with the previous image. That makes the article indeed unstable. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guess someone has to keep an updated image of her regularly. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems IndianBio has problems with my edits....huh? Is it your article. If yes, then i will not change and see who is talking about stability. I think people should do their job and should not interfare with other's work.—Prashant 09:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO, keeping it classy as always eh? @Kailash29792:, yes we need to come to a consensus about the image since there is no reason why the main image would need to be changed continuously. Chopra's face does not change on a monthly basis and last I remembered she is not listed as Mystique on the run, ergo. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:05, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you by chance have a link to it? At the music biographies extensive discusssions are usually done and a consensus is achieved to change an image. That is how it should be here alos I believe. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
IndianBio, I finally (maybe always) felt that the infobox image should not be regularly changed, until the subject has undergone a major facial change. But Piggy Chops looks very youthful even at almost 32 and may still look the same for many years, so I don't see a point in regularly changing the image... Maybe until she becomes at least a bit fairer than her current state. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is what I am trying to achieve. Let's find one high-resolution perfect image and stick to it, until her facial features change majorly or she adapts a major makeover, like Ranveer Singh did with the RaamLeela phase moustache. Does that sound reasonable? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When you say "let's find...", you are implying yet another change. Different editors will have their own preference leading to wasted time in debate. If the present image has good copyright status, which I think it does, let's just leave it. BollyJeff | talk 13:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Bolly I did not mean that we go around looking for one, sorry for that. I'm fine sticking up with this image in the infobox if everyone agrees. So no change is needed. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 13:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2014

Maheshau (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, no request. —SpacemanSpiff 08:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2014

< Redacted personal attack > Maheshau (talk) 08:39, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, your personal perceptions of her has no candle over here in Wikipedia. Strongly suggest you read WP:NOTFORUM and do not continue to slander a biography, even in its talk page. And do not abuse the edit template. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2014

| height = 169 centimetres (5.54 ft) Ddmteetu (talk) 09:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done WP:UNDUE. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 09:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2014

divyang virani 150.242.17.41 (talk) 10:50, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]