Jump to content

Talk:Lotus berthelotii

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 208.44.170.115 (talk) at 15:01, 18 November 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPlants Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed this from the article felt it should be discussed, placed it here

This is not correct! Birds of the Phylloscopus-Group are active vistors of Lotus-Flowers! Even the worm looking friutrs of Lotus berthelotii are ditributed by these birds! Placed by [134.147.131.6] ΣcoPhreekΔ 16:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lotus birds are33 fattttt

Check J. Biogeogr. 31 p.1945-: "Bird-flower interactions in the Macaronesian Islands" to resolve. Dysmorodrepanis 17:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ecophreek is correct regarding Phylloscopus birds as visitors to the flowers of Lotus berthelotii and the most recent research shows that in fact the plant is adequately pollinated by these birds, but doesn't set fruit as it is probably a single clonal genotype. I have edited the text accordingly and this section is now accurate. Speakingofcities (talk) 07:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The photograph

More possible correcting; the current photo on the article page is of a plant that is often found in cultivation, but usually then called L. maculatus BREITFELD. The one usually found as bertholetii has flowers that are more reddish, and finer leaves. Whether they are different species, or subspecies, I don't know. Imc 19:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]