User talk:Willmcw~enwiki

User talk:Willmcw/archive1
User talk:Willmcw/archive2
User talk:Willmcw/archive3
User talk:Willmcw/archive4
User talk:Willmcw/archive5 July 2005
User talk:Willmcw/archive6 August 2005
User talk:Willmcw/archive7 September 2005
User talk:Willmcw/archive8 October 2005
User talk:Willmcw/archive9 November 2005
User talk:Willmcw/archive10 December 2005

Lyndon LaRouche associate Paul Gallagher

Did you ever find out the particulars of his conviction? The main article on LaRouche lists him as convicted but with no particulars. Thanks!--Beth Wellington 21:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well. Thanks anyway. I was looking for a specific source and only found stuff on Larouche's own site.--Beth Wellington 01:49, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, but I was looking for non Larouche sources. See {http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/intro.htm#schiller} which explains that it was published in a pubication by "Larouche collaborators." Sigh. --Beth Wellington 22:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can....

Can you transfer copies of all remaining Wikipedia links to my Userpage, including the one concerning editing a article. I am planning to create a article in which these may be listed as some sort of directory, so that Users will not have to go all over the place to find the info. that they are requesting. The Wiki-links that I already have in my own directory have been useful. In this "Wiki Directory", I can access different Wiki-sections rapidly and easily, instead of having to go all over the place. I believe that a Wiki-Directory, such as I've set up is a good idea. Also, can you archive my User Talk page for me. I don't want to mess it up, or get accused of vandalisim.

By the way, I did read the indicated source. 04:23, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Admin.

Where are you listed in the Wikipedia:Administrators:list of Administrators ? Martial Law 04:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Willmcw can now be found at User:Will Beback

virago

see this: [1] Slrubenstein | Talk 23:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just stopped by to thank you (belatedly) for your good wishes. In archiving my talk page this a.m., I came across your entry. Peace. deeceevoice 11:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why the change of name? Is it meant to confuse me, specifically? If so, success! Best regards, El_C 16:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have never 'vandalised' an article on 'Cattle'

I must say that I found your note to me somewhat offensive as I never vandalised wikipedia or even looked at the article you refer to - on cattle. It may be that every AOL user comes up the same (as we sem to be classified as multiple users) but rest assured I have not done anything untoward. Ben

Dsol again

Please check disruptive edits by DSOL and Ryan Utt on the page Mark Ames

Attack on Pearl Harbor spoken article

Hi - I saw you were listed as working on the Attack on Pearl Harbor article - just letting you know I recorded this article and uploaded it a week or so ago (hope you didn't get too far w/ it). Thanks for your help w/ the spoken article project BTW. Athf1234 16:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking over fair-use image disputes

Will, your input would be very much appreciated at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Blocking_over_fair-use_image_disputes, regarding the circumstances in which it is okay to block a user over a fair-use (or other copyright) dispute. We're trying to find a balance between wording that is tough on copyright violation but that also offers some protection to good-faith editors. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:01, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protest Warrior

A blast from the past. A Protest Warrior member is trying to rewrite the article to suit his personal view of the organisation. Any chance that you could take a look at it and see what you think? --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:21, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmotheism Disambiguation Page

Will, I am registerd user "Oklahoma" I anonymously edited the Cosmotheism page and was banned by Mel Etitis for "Vandalism". If you look at the history you will see that what I did was not vandalism. Since then I have registerd as user "Oklahoma". The issue under dispute is whether Mordecay Nesiyahu "created the term" Cosmotheism. I gave evidence on the discussion page that he in fact did not, but Mel did not respond, he just changed it back and locked the page. Is this how Wikipedia is supposed to work? I think that it gives Wikipedia a "black eye" when someone puts up information that is demonstrably false. Could you tell me why Mel Etitis would do this? Some help in restoring truth to the Cosmotheism Disambiguation page would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, registerd user "Oklahoma"

Mel Etitis has banned me

Will, Mel has banned me because he thinks I am "Paul Vogel". I am not Paul Vogel. I would think he could or you could verify this. He has banned me for simply proving him wrong about who "created the term" Cosmotheism. Now he's edited the page to read "prominent user of the term". I would submit that that is nonsense. I'm not suggesting that Pierce be listed at "prominent user of the term", but he is more "prominently" connected to the term than Nesiyahu. What is Mel Etitis' motivation. Let me repeat, I am not Paul Vogel, I am the guy you had discussions with about Cosmotheism links on the white supremacy page. I am only interested in upholding truth and accuracy. I should not be banned. Thank you, Oklahoma

Thank you Oklahoma

Image Tagging Image:Cm-timessquare2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cm-timessquare2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Barrett and the Crosstar Image

FYI: User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Richard_Barrett_and_the_Crosstar_Image Kaldari 19:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Dollar

I've nominated the page "Liberty Dollar" for nomination and am notifying you accordingly since you are a contributor. BrianGCrawfordMA 23:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Szaszcruise_picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Szaszcruise_picture.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguating Akshardham

Hi,

Some changes were made by an anonymous user User:83.67.4.89 in the Akshardham page.

The Akshardham has different perceptions in popluar media and in religious philosophy.

I have included a link to the Akshardham (Philosophy) in the akshardham disambiguation page called Akshardham Temple and redirected Akshardham to that page.

To give proper justice to philosophical meaning, the link for philosophy has been placed above temple links

Uday 06:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Norm Coleman

Hi, I am sending this message to serious contributors who may be interested in articles related to U.S. politics. I believe I am receiving an unreasonable response-- and at times insulting and rude-- from the editors of this article, who refuse to remove a section that may offer some interesting trivia for Wikipeidia users, but is irrelevant to people interested in reading an encyclopedia article on a member of U.S. Senate. If you have time, please take a look at the article. 172 | Talk 03:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LaRouche nuts, and....

Your regular talk is still protected. I shot down this LaRouche edit and happened upon this by the same anon. My first thought is reverting to the pre-anon (practically blanking), but....I don't know; this isn't the type of subject I deal with. Thoughts? --TJive 06:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Sathya_Sai_Baba

Will, because you have been involved in this article too, you may be interested to comment of give evidence. Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba/Evidence. Andries 04:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]