Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoë Soul

Zoë Soul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacking significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources does not meet the inclusion criteria (even WP:ANYBIO), and qualifies for deletion.

It may be WP:TOOSOON to have an article on 'Zoe Soul'. Well, there are some coverage of her, but they are all commentary of the subject about themselves, i.e interviews, hence can't considered independent and contribute to establish notability of the subject.

Yahoo celebrity search engine doesn't produce even a single result for the subject ([1]). I'm not here saying that Yahoo determines notability on Wikipedia, but it at least gives us an idea about. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

aka:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

band:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Would anyone looking at her career feel that WP:ENT is verifiable? This may be less a matter of Too Soon and finally one of be just Soon Enough for a suitable stub to remain and be expanded and improved over time and through regular editing. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:48, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]