Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathleen Mead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Davey2010 (talk | contribs) at 16:07, 3 December 2014 (Kathleen Mead: Oops amen). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Kathleen Mead (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable character and article has IMDB references with tons of plot detail. Does not meet GNG. Also per recent AfDs for similar characters in the series: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tessa Campanelli, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly J. Sinclair, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Stone (Degrassi character), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Cameron all which were closed as delete/redirect. Gloss 18:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and clean up. The fact that the article needs improvement is not a criteria for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


But the fact that it doesn't properly demonstrate or source any notability in the first place is a criterion for deletion. Bearcat (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deadbeef 07:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]