User talk:Loveoffood007

§== Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot ==

Hi Loveoffood007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attention!

I noticed that you started the article Razak Khan. Unfortunately, It is not much more than a filmography. Without any personal details this article is likely to be removed. To make it worse: unreferenced articles about living people will always be removed. You article is unreferenced, as external links don't count as references. So, please, can you fix those two point to save your article? Thanks in advance! The Banner talk 22:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monica Walker

I removed {{db-a7}} because the statement that "Walker will be participating in the 2014 United States Olympic Curling Trials, as selected by the national High Performance Program" is enough to escape A7. Granted, this article will almost certainly die if you nominate it for deletion through WP:Articles for deletion unless it is significantly improved, but it doesn't qualify for A7. You may also propose the article for deletion. Please re-read WP:Criteria for speedy deletion#A7 before adding it to more articles. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Adil Mansuri

Hello Loveoffood007. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Adil Mansuri, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 11:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me and tell me whats the reason for deleting my article

I have noticed you deleted my article about V Star Creations Pvt Ltd.I don't understand what is the reason you felt to delete my article, Article content is completely defines about V Star Creations Company ,founders and the products (our products are Vanessa,Valero,Little Vanessa and Little Valero .V Star Creations is very much popular in South India and its business spread over India and Middle East, also it is the sister concern of V Guard Industries.I felt article related to this much reputed organisation in wikipedia is very much necessary.The contents in the article taken from its own website and other 2 article sites that I have mentioned in the reference section of the article. I hope deletion happened as of misread, I kindly request you to please recheck the article and approve the article about V Star Creations.If you really feel the article I have submitted doesn't meet wikipedia requirements then please feel free to share me the things I could improve. Then I can edit the article again. I would appreciate if you recheck the article and approve it. Thank You! Jimmy Wendells. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmywendells12 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Loveoffood007: You may want to read User talk:JohnCD#V Star Creations Pvt Ltd before replying. It links to the deletion review and an AFC submission on the same topic. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i had a quick look. --Foodie (talk) 16:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has since created V Star Creations. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What should we do now? CSD or PROD? It seems this author is not going to accept deletion in any possible way. --Foodie (talk) 22:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is in its present form in a day or two, I will likely either PROD or AFD it. AFD is a "stronger" form of deletion - it's basically saying "no article on this topic with the problems that this article has can be in the encyclopedia, period." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Razak Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Razak Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razak Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hallo, You might want to reconsider the colour of your user-page link in your signature: red links usually mean only one thing in WP, the absence of a page - rather confusing. Best wishes, PamD 12:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

: Thanks For Your Concern. Updated. Thanks --Foodie (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Edgeworth Eagles FC

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on '''Edgeworth Eagles FC'''. I do not think that 'Edgeworth Eagles FC' fits any of the speedy deletion criteriabecause PLease note that "Edgeworth Eagles FC are in the Northern New South Wales league" is sufficient context. It allows the reader to find out what the subject is. A1 is only when no reasonable reader can determine what the article is supposed to be about.. I request that you consider not re-tagging 'Edgeworth Eagles FC' for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 16:47, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarification. I wont tag it again. Thanks --Foodie (talk) 18:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@loveoffood007

Hai,

I didnt understand why you nominated my article about V Star Creations for deletion. I didnt feel it have any essence of promotion or advertisement or violate wikipedia rules. This Company is a well reputed firm whose subsidiaries are V Guard, Wonderla and VeegaLand. V Star Creations is much famous in South India. So I request you to Please check once again and remove your tag.

Thank You! Neena Vineeth

Jessica Asato

I don't understand your tag. There are six references in the article, all to reliable, secondary sources. How many do you want?Rathfelder (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Rathfelder:, I do not find all of the sources are reliable. They're more likely press release websites. I am editing the page for you and will try to add more reliable sources. Thanks --Loveoffood007 (talk) 10:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, @Rathfelder:, I've removed the tags and added new referneces. Do add a biography infobox and her picture. --Loveoffood007 (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- could you put your references in the proper form please?

Which of these sites do you regard as press release websites?Rathfelder (talk) 11:35, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Glouftsis

Like Jessica I don't understand your tag. What gives you the right to tag a page created in good faith to be deleted? I have included numerous references, both from the publisher and other sources in relation to their convergence event. I worked very hard to create this page that involves a very important event that DC Comics is in the middle of announcing this month. Let me clear, if you succeed in getting this deleted, I will merely post it again. Stop causing problems. I am no spring chicken on wikipedia, I have created numerous comics related pages in the past.

@Tangaroa007:, Thanks for leaving me a message. If you're not a spring chicken on wikipedia you should know how to add references to a page? I have tagged the page for cleanup not for deletion. You should clean the template for errors & then remove tags. If you do not comply the basic editorial guidelines i'll send this page to PROD. Do clean it up or else it wont stay here. P.s: Not an old chicken terry, try to sign your talk's. --Loveoffood007 (talk) 10:03, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- @Tangaroa007:, I reviewed your page again, the references you are using are not notable. I did some quick research and found some quality references. Do use these 1,2,3. For references please use the reference template. Thanks. --Loveoffood007 (talk) 10:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow angry much? The wider wikipedia community always corrects this for me. Feel free to edit these in if you like but there's no need to be so acrimonious. Wikipedia does not belong to you alone. We are a community. Besides the addition of the specific references is the only thing I don't know how to do. Others have always graciously fixed this for me. As you can see I have added references on the page (and some directly from the publisher). Next time it might be more prudent for you to contact me directly rather than tagging the page. I can see from this page that you do this often. Perhaps , with respect you should reconsider how you approach people, because clearly you made me a little mad. And perhaps I should also keep this in mind too. My apologies for any offence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangaroa007 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, @Tangaroa007:, you should learn why do we have "Tags" invented if we have had to contact editors to fix updates. You are missing the core ideology of Tags. Adding clean up tag on your page meant, someone of the larger community should come up and fix this for you. Was that really an offence? --Loveoffood007 (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Eric Meng

Hello Loveoffood007. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Eric Meng, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: tagging M JO for speedy deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because it provides information about a Taiwanese celebrity fashion line. Since a company, organization, or product can be an article's subject (for example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jessica_Simpson_Collection and other fashion labels), I believe this page qualifies as informative. I have removed information that could be deemed promotional and stuck to factual information, but I welcome other suggestions. --0473 (talk) 07:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed speedy delete tag, thanks for improving it. Try to add more notable references. Thanks. --Loveoffood007 (talk) 07:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 2deadbeatz

Hi Loveoffood007,

I received your message regarding marking the page 2deadbeatz for deletion. I am curious about the reasoning behind its deletion so I can avoid future cases as this.

Thank you. Modul8ted (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I've answered my own question. Subject is not one of considerable importance, which would explain why I cannot find any sources on the matter. It also seems like the duo has ceased further works. Thanks, learned something new. Modul8ted (talk) 21:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]