User talk:Yacatisma

Leyla Yunus

Template:RestoredPROD Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance.--Yacatisma (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dumfries Courier

Thanksfor having a look at the Dumfries Courier page. Any particular sentences that you feel could benefit from additional / better sources? Mhbeals (talk) 07:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think if you add external link that should be enough.--Yacatisma (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really sorry. I don't understand. An external link to what? To related sites (like the archives which hold it)?Mhbeals (talk) 10:58, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok. Article is ready and fine.--Yacatisma (talk) 15:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard de Rose

Thank you for your recent review of Gerard de Rose. As I read Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals an artist can be considered notable if their work is held (in the permanent collections of) several notable galleries. I assume galleries are notable if they have Wikipedia articles. de Rose's work is in the permanent collections of at least three notable galleries - see: Gerard de Rose#Holdings (Touchstones provides the art gallery for the Rochdale Arts & Heritage Service). Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 18:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit and improvement of the article. I removed the template

GA review swap?

Hi Yacatisma, I saw that you have Baku up for a GA review. I've just recently nominated Antananarivo, the capital of Madagascar. Would you be interested in doing a GA review swap? I could review yours, and you review mine? Since we're both writing on capitals, I think we'd be in a good position to review each other's work with a similar outlook, to the benefit of both articles. - Lemurbaby (talk) 00:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yacatisma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is public computer and IP shouldn't banned for people to use it. Yacatisma (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A combination of technical and behavioral evidence shows that you are using multiple accounts in violation of policy. As such, I'm declining your unblock request. Mike V • Talk 20:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of List of defunct Azerbaijani football stadiums

The article List of defunct Azerbaijani football stadiums has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one stadium listed, inherently non-notable subject. No indication that the notion of defunct stadia in Azerbaijan has garnered anywhere near the level of coverage required for a standalone list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 11:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Qarabağ FK

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Qarabağ FK you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Qarabağ FK

The article Qarabağ FK you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Qarabağ FK for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 10:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mugham albums by artist nationality

Category:Mugham albums by artist nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alim Qasimov

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alim Qasimov you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alim Qasimov

The article Alim Qasimov you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alim Qasimov for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baku

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baku you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Khojaly Massacre

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Khojaly Massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baku

The article Baku you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Baku for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Khojaly Massacre

The article Khojaly Massacre you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Khojaly Massacre for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Baku

The article Baku you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Baku for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Khojaly Massacre

The article Khojaly Massacre you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Khojaly Massacre for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]