User talk:Lor

Awaiting your views - Thanks

This is just a gentle reminder with reference to the earlier query on 13 Dec . It ‘ll be good to understand views about that “stub" resulting your decision. 10 world record citations is notable reference for a stub. Thanks One life to live (talk) 06:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

@Samuell1616: Is this about my AfC reviews? Can you give me a page link please? Thanks Lor^Chat 06:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, plz its [: Draft Hradyesh] - Thanks One life to live (talk) 06:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

@Lor: Hi , Just checking if you managed some time to review this stub with reference to the query. Thanks One life to live (talk) 04:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

@Samuell1616: Looking at it again, I'd say it's  Ready to be moved to mainspace. Resubmit it and I'll publish it Lor^Chat 01:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Small point

Thanks for closing down my exchanges with Gregkaye yesterday and my apologies to you for the trouble they caused. I have left him a conciliatory a message on his Talk page today which I hope he will take the right way. There is one small point that bothers me slightly, which I don't want to raise with Greg for fear of causing more trouble. I struck out my main offending remark but am concerned that Greg has deleted my apology and explanation for it, "Sorry, I was provoked". I am aware that there is at least one other co-editor who has been following this upset and would not want any passer-by to misunderstand. At the moment with the remark struck out and my explanation deleted, it could look as if Greg struck out the remark himself. Knowing Greg I am quite sure he is not aware of the impression it now gives, that I had not withdrawn the remark myself and apologised. He would never want to deliberately misrepresent. If you think I am making too much of this, please ignore it, but if you can think of a gentle way to ask Greg to restore the apology and explanation, I would be grateful if you could. I have apologised to Greg for my bad behaviour yesterday in my message. We have never fallen out like this before and I am sure we both never want it to happen again. ~ P-123 (talk) 13:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

I have asked Gregkaye to restore my apology and explanation, but there seems to be some reluctance to do this. This is deliberate censorship. Where can I take this to be dealt with? P-123 (talk) 15:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Problems with Gregkaye (2)

Thank you for closing down the "discussion". I am not usually such a bad judge of people. Maybe it is something to do with online contact, where so many cues are lost. My attempts to reconcile today were obviously a waste of time and badly judged. I will have to reduce contact with this editor. I hope you will keep up the surveillance. ~ P-123 (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

RE: Usurp request

Please see my edit at the usurp request page. Melody Concerto^talk 02:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Man Haron Monis.jpeg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Man Haron Monis.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2014/12/17/1227159/014873-e87f886c-855a-11e4-b6d1-a55c994c6803.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WWGB (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Cyberbullying

Hi Lor, I'm Taichi from Spanish Wikipedia. I'm sorry but the user ELreydeEspana persist with threats and insults. , and he said at the end "you will pay me, along everyone [sysop]". Is very clearly that behavior is totally unnaceptable, also the Spanish Wikipedia sysops are very worried about the vandalic conduct of this user against me and another sysops affected. So please, I need a very strong response about this cyberbullying. I have 10 years as user in Wikipedia, and I will inform about this in another stances because is impossible that English Wikipedia is used as refugee for these actions. Sorry if I actued some rude in this message, but this is intolerable for me. Thanks. --Taichi (talk) 06:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey @Taichi:. I Appreciate your resilience. I will get this dealt with as fast as i possibly can. Lor^Chat 06:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)