User talk:Unibond

Message by Mr. Wikia Contributor.

Sorry for my grammar, so I am sorry that in the edit in "The Ant Bully" was considered euphemism, I edited a contributior's edit, because of the words starting with capitals. I fixed that, but I did not mean to accidentally say euphemism! I am deeply sorry. (End of message) I am also sorry if this is vandalism. 68.149.184.93 (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HoneyBaked Ham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York World's Fair and Cheboygan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Geoffrey Malcolm Copland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geoffrey Malcolm Copland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 02:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Honey Baked Ham

DB is currently dealing with health issues, so that's why he hasn't responded. The issue is though nobody is searching the rd with all those characters and expecting the generic ham article, which only mentions 'honey' twice. The redirect is proper and correct. Nate • (chatter) 01:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to create a well-sourced article regarding the concept of honey ham, nobody is stopping you at all. As it is though, with 'honey' mentioned only twice in the article, a redirect to the brand remains apporpriate. Nate • (chatter) 02:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rossi

It would be helpful to have a reference for "convicted fraudster". I agree that Rossi has been convicted of offenses, but my understanding is they were environmental. So I don't see how it is correct that the article should say "convicted fraudster". Jra (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see article re Petroldragon, In 1974, Rossi registered a patent for an incineration system. In 1978, he wrote The Incineration of Waste and River Purification, published in Milan by Tecniche Nuove. He then founded Petroldragon, a company for developing oil from waste, which collapsed in the 1990s amidst allegations of dumping toxic waste,[11] and accusations of tax fraud. Its assets were seized, together with Rossi's personal assets, and Rossi was arrested pending trial. Rossi spent four years in prison working on his legal defense in 56 trials, 5 of which ended in convictions related to tax fraud. Unibond (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nymf (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]