Talk:Old Tom Parr

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Old Tom Parr article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

London Start‑class Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Circumstances of death

I've read that when Parr was eating with King Charles I, he choked on some food and died at the table. This seems to be someone's greatly exaggerated version of him simply not handling the change of diet after he went to London. -- JackofOz (talk) 03:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image(s) needed

As I recall this article had some images originally. Where are they? How do we put an image request on the front page of the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragemanchoo (talk • contribs)

Which Earl of Arundel?

However, he was blind and feeble when the Earl of Arundel met him, so it seems that he was very old, possibly a centenarian. Which one? There are about 5 different people this could be. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 20:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed so: the 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd or 23rd in fact. Extremely sexy (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]