User talk:Majora4

Userboxes

I changed all your HTML tables on your userboxes page to Wikitables. I hope this helps. — Nathan ^(talk) _{/ 03:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

WikiProject Furry

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 23:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eesaia Jude Filbrun

I could find the book - it's self-published with lulu. That doesn't make it notable, but it shows it does exist... Peridon (talk) 22:33, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback?

I see you've been doing a lot of anti-vandalism work. Thanks a lot! Would you like me to enable rollback on your account to make vandalism reversion easier? Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would, thank you. I appreciate being trusted with the privilege. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You can display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Pokémon

Thank you for your help giving the empty, split sections summaries. I did the first half of 1-50, but never found time for more. I hope you continue. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 14:52, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UBX/KFC

User:UBX/KFC, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/KFC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/KFC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Carbon Rodney 10:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear: Purple Emperor

I'm terribly sorry. I didn't catch the synonym. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. It's possible that they're distinct. I can't find info on synonyms. Perhaps the genus is called Purple Emperor. I've asked at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lepidoptera#Possible duplicate article. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Two different species. Sorry if I freaked you out.

By the way, good job on the article. And, it's always a good idea to make redirects for the synonyms. Best wishes, :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. You did a great job. This was the first article I've created, so I wasn't certain about all the procedures and such. Thanks a bunch. – Majora4 (leave a message) 21:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The racist edit

A level 3 warning would be justified, I think. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestion. I had wondered if a higher level warning might have been appropriate, but I figured the warnings could always escalate if the user continued to vandalize Wikipedia. – Majora4 (leave a message) 22:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, my friend. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hamsa

Hamsa

My removing the text where fatima's hand is associated to islam was not a mistake, the text was a mistake. Fatima's hand is purely cultural and is actually considered shirk in islam (a major sin). It is not believed to bring good luck on Islam, to the contrary believing in things such as amulets bringing luck is a major sin.

If you have other questions about shirk or the symbolism of fatima's hand in Islam please read the contents of these links

http://islamqa.info/en/126359 http://islamqa.info/en/34817 I hope you will understand why I have deleted the content from the article and not restore the inaccurate ( and offensive) content