User talk:OpenMind

Hydraulif Fracking

Please do not link personal blogs in the external link or futher reading sections. Read up on WP:RS and WP:EL for more information. Personal blogs can only be used in very specific situations, primarly the article for which the person is about. Arzel (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited Eva Tanguay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Musical and George Jessel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article on Liu Wanchuan

Hey there OpenMind!

Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier. Your article looks good to me. You're getting good at this!

I do have a few suggestions: link "Cultural Revolution" to its existing Wikipedia page, drop or reconsider the use of the word "systematically" (how else do students learn from their teachers?), and do a minor rewrite of the paragraph about Liu Wanchuan's students (were they actual accepted disciples or simply known students of his?). The paragraph is a dry list of students, and may not be too interesting.

I hope the powers that be in Wikipedia do think your article is worth publishing.

Best regards,

Bruno talk 22:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Tom Wilber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 22:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven Forrest (astrologer) (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steven Forrest (astrologer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 13:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! OpenMind, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 13:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]