Wikipedia:Training/For students/Leave feedback
Training feedback Ansel.borhauer (talk)
- What I liked
The videos and the interactive training are great teaching tools.
- What I didn't like
I feel like there could be more activities for the training rather than a quick run through.
- What was missing
Explanation of the signature, I didn't think it just to be the tildes, I thought I had to write my name in.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing really, it all seemed appropriate.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great, Wish there was more.
--Ansel.borhauer (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Great videos explaining details, if you have basic HTML knowledge it ends up being managable
- What I didn't like
I wish there were more sections where you could test out how to use the information give
- What was missing
What i stated above for uploading photos
- What was unnecessary
What makes a good article
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was good, took some getting used to but overall it was very helpful.
--Jamesjohnson3 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the interactive part
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lozmeister (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Helped me get a better understanding of how wikipedia works behind the scenes
- What I didn't like
... Some common knowledge presented that was unnecessary
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... simple common things anyone with knowledge of wikipedia and writing skills should know
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I did not try it
--Scienceguy21 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the videos explaining and showing content.
- What I didn't like
... a lot of reading
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Psych2015 (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the interactive part
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... more activities where we try each thing ourselves rather than just watch an informational video
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it was very useful
--Jjp73 (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The incorporation of videos throughout the tutorials.
- What I didn't like
I thought the interactive editing tutorial could be improved.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought the tutorial was short but to the point. It had some issues/bugs but it was still effective.
--Kkg123 (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The broad overview.
- What I didn't like
Maybe it could have been a little more specific.
- What was missing
More real examples of how to do things.
- What was unnecessary
The lecture on who other people on Wikipedia are.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Neat.
--Vrastall (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
I loved the interactive editing tutorials; they were very helpful. I liked the overall tutorial
--COV Western (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were very helpful and not too long
- What I didn't like
... Very wordy and sometimes hard to follow.
- What was missing
... Everything seemed to be covered.
- What was unnecessary
... All the words, visuals would be better, like pictures as well as the videos.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was hard to follow because sometimes they way you clicked the order of the buttons in the tutorial, it would take you out of the tutorial and then you couldn't get back into the tutorial unless you started over from the beginning.
--Katelynn.cox (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Very simple to navigate
...
- What I didn't like
- I got stuck on the citation part of the tutorial, after completing what it said to do it still did not work.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing i could tell, however this is new for me.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful I need hands on training so it was great
...
--Tgoodkey (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The information and videos were quite thoroughly beneficial. ...
- What I didn't like
... Nothing.
- What was missing
... Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I think it was very educational. Gave me a new view of Wikipedia.
--StanLeehen (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were very helpful!
- What I didn't like
...The text, videos, and tutorials seemed a bit redundant... Maybe get rid of one of them.
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... As I said earlier, the three forms of portraying the same information was a bit redundant.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it very helpful.
--Semaj311 (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Very helpful and straightforward. I liked that it gave links to find other resources without including an excessive amount of information in the training.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Deitkm (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The interactive editing tutorial and how straightforward the training was.
- What I didn't like
... Pressing X on the interactive sandbox tutorials caused the helpful hints to stop. popping up
- What was missing
... Nothing; all of the main components seemed to be there. The information presented seemed to be adequate enough for a beginner to understand the basics.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing; the tutorial was to the point.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I like it, but my concern was with exiting the hints. When pressing the arrow, the tutorial continues but when you click X it stops. It was hard to find my place in the tutorial afterwards and I felt a bit lost until I gave up and restarted it, realizing that I shouldn't press X. Besides that, I think the tutorial was helpful with my first user experience with Wikipedia.
--ChipsAndChopsticks (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...How comprehensive the training was!
- What I didn't like
...It was kind of difficult to navigate when the pages took me out of the training modules.
- What was missing
...nothing!
- What was unnecessary
...nothing!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...best part!
--Chandlerbuchanan (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The step by step tutorials.
...
- What I didn't like
- There was nothing that I did not like.
...
- What was missing
- I believe that there was nothing missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- There was nothing that I thought was unnecessary.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?I thought that it was very helpful rather than reading.
...
--Buchaly15 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- I liked the videos provided!--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What I didn't like
- too much text involved, maybe words should complement the videos--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What was missing
- someway to train and edit while completing the editorial--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What was unnecessary
- The links taking me away from training--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Overall it helped me dramatically!--Luisq15 (talk) 21
- 26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The interactive tutorials
- What I didn't like
The text instructions will probably be forgotten soon. I learned much more when having to edit using the tutorial than reading about editing.
- What was missing
More interactive tutorials would be great!
- What was unnecessary
-
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great. More of this would, rather than videos/text instruction would help.
--Btw777 (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
live interactive typing examples of editing, such as the user being able to type along with the tutorial to try some things
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Altb478 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
…easy to navigate
- What I didn't like
…when you clicked the links you couldn't get back to where you left off
- What was missing
…N/A
- What was unnecessary
…N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…I didn't know how to get back to page I was on without starting over
--Spidey1994 (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Simple, easy to follow
...
- What I didn't like
- Videos rely on java.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing really, serves the purpose of an intro
...
- What was unnecessary
- I didn't feel the videos added anything to the training, seemed a bit repetitive of the text.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try it.
...
--Veterinarydreams (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- it had some humor embedded in the instruction
...
- What I didn't like
- it was quiet lengthy, and it would not be possible to memorize everything on the spot anyways.
...
- What was missing
- I think it would be helpful to have a demo as the person actually works through for the first time.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? i liked it better than just reading about it. But based on size of your window, you are sometimes unable to click the links that you want to move on to the next step.
...
--Jukaredaa (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Othrowt (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Clear and Concise tutorial about how to Edit Wikipedia Articles, Also liked the interactive tutorials along the way giving a chance to practice making edits.
- What I didn't like
... Loved it all
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Really helpful feature, favorite part of the entire process.
--VarunS93 (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The tutorial was very simple and it really helped me see what goes into making articles and edits. ...
- What I didn't like
Sometimes the box that shows the progress was in the way of what I did so I could not see if it was correct. ...
- What was missing
I cannot think of anything ...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was awesome ...
--Rgirar1 (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked the step-by-step tutorials in module 3
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Caitlinmcgrath (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I like because is very fun new things
- What I didn't like
...i really like all
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jangola27 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
…I like that each part of the training was well organized and concise. I thought the train gin was extremely in depth and well though out. Each step of editing was addressed.
- What I didn't like
…I did not like how long the train took. It took me about 2.5 hours to finish this and I don't remember a lot of what I learned because the process was so lengthy.
- What was missing
…I know it was training, but it was extremely morning and it took all my brain power to focus for only a few minutes.
- What was unnecessary
…The readings were uneasy when a video was posted that explained the exact same thing. i though the videos were the most helpful part of the process.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…The interactive tutorial was ok, I did not try it for very long but I though it was helpful in understanding the editing process.
--LLP210 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The training was engaging and I did not get bored.
- What I didn't like
It was hard to find the training.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
well thought out and good
--Tmartin3576 (talk) 07:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The videos helped give a visual example to the process of code.
- What I didn't like
Nothing
- What was missing
Maybe more examples of how to use the code
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was good for practicing how to do everything.
--MeganMcIlvenna (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--LiRuiQing (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Xiaoxuxu0313 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- very informative
...
- What I didn't like
- The interactive editing tool had an X button that blocked words, and was annoying at times
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--ArjunChawla175 (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
This training was very informative and helped lay out the specifics in creating your on wiki page.
- What I didn't like
Some things were still a little difficult to understand, such as citations and how to include pictures with the correct format, however, I know we will be discussing more and more of these topics in class and with a librarian so I feel as though I will understand more of what is expected after doing so.
- What was missing
I didn't feel as though anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
Everything in this training was necessary and was definitely needed in order to make a successful wiki page.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not try the interactive editing tutorial, but based off what it said it is going to be useful to have and getting other peoples opinions and feedback on things is what will help you become a better writer. Just remember to not take anything personally because it is all for our benefit.
--Kcabral18 (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos and the helpful modules where you were actually using the programs helped a lot
- What I didn't like
... Some of the information seemed redundant or repeated
- What was missing
... Not Much
- What was unnecessary
... Repeated information
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Friggin awesome --AGSPianoMan (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
very informative, especially the editing
- What I didn't like
It doesn't say where the information can be accessed in the future.
- What was missing
Nothing, it was thorough
- What was unnecessary
Definitely, and helpful.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful
--Enthusiast006 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--X-pert Dreamer (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- the videos were clear
...
- What I didn't like
- I find coding difficult
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It helped me understanding
...
--GiuliaBalsamo (talk) 20:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Easy and quick to work through
...
- What I didn't like
- Lack of videos
...
- What was missing
- More videos
...
- What was unnecessary
- Too much information about the community
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a
...
--MariaCabrera23 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Detailed explanation on every point. Well organized helpful information.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SlavicaZ3 (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
All of the useful information
- What I didn't like
I would like the option to advance to the next page with keyboard shortcuts
- What was missing
Nothing!!
- What was unnecessary
Nothing!!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very Helpful! --KTB123english (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Very concise and relevant. Videos were short and very helpful.
- What I didn't like
Some of the instructions had grammatical errors.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very useful to actually do the editing rather than just read about it.
--Zchen373 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bellre (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The interactive portion and the videos.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like all the information that did not include interactive portions.
- What was missing
I can't think of anything that was missing.
- What was unnecessary
Learning communication skills to use when talking with others on Wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I think it was very helpful.
Training feedback
- What I liked
Very interactive.
- What I didn't like
Overly extensive.
- What was missing
no
- What was unnecessary
The advanced editing section
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
useful
--Wiggins jake (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
Very informative, and had lots of helpful videos
- What I didn't like
...
Constant reiteration of the same things
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ehylemon (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The interactive editing training.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some aspects could have been a little more thorough.
...
- What was missing
- A handout displaying each step of the editing process.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The videos.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were very helpful
...
--Krb45698 (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...There was detailed step by step instructions to follow which made it easier to practice. I also enjoyed actually submitting editing which will help me when I embark on the wiki page project.
- What I didn't like
... There were lots of clips through the tutorial which I was unable to listen to due to being in a classroom with other students. This could have been disruptive to others. If I had known in advance I could have brought some headphones.
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I have enjoyed the tutorial as it gives me the hands on experience of editing the page and attempting other tasks relevant to the use of wikipedia.
--Victoria Mealor (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I liked how thorough the training was and how helpful all the tips are.
- What I didn't like
... My videos not working.
- What was missing
... Maybe more pictures rather than videos.
- What was unnecessary
... The confusing graphs and charts.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought it was great and incredibly helpful.
--Laurendiaz (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- it was very informative a lot information liked the links and practice in the sandbox
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- the java links
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked them they worked very well and were very straight forward and helpful
...
--RERoyal (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The amount of information.
- What I didn't like
... The amount of information.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...