User talk:Dominus Vobisdu/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Query

I was asked what you were trying to do here. Can you explain, please? --John (talk) 10:45, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Before you explain, may I suggest you read thisand this and note that John has reverted posts on the Talk:Acupuncture page. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 11:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Redacted, yes. It looks like you are off-line. On your return, please don't make any more edits like this or you will be blocked. Thanks, --John (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

polish names

Maybe you could link to the regular at that blog? It would be totally unobjectionable, and we could replace the contentious comments with a mere "this guy's an expert" statement. μηδείς (talk) 00:17, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for repeated WP:BATTLE behaviour on alternative medicine topics. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 11:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Harsh. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 15:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

It does seem a bit much for a first civility block. But there's nothing that can be done about it. DV just needs to sit it out and resolve to do better at playing the Wikipedia Game. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 15:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Ayurveda

Hi. As someone who has edited this article recently, I am bringing your attention to a proposed set of restrictions at Talk:Ayurveda#Going forward. I see this action as necessary to allow harmonious editing at the article, and to prevent more blocks going forward. Best regards, --John (talk) 20:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Homeopathy

Hi, history about homeopathy is a valid content. --Pediainsight (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please, return the content to its place. --Pediainsight (talk) 22:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

I am going to return the content if you do not introduce it in his place. --Pediainsight (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Howdy

It's good to see you have resumed editing. Welcome back. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Got a bit burnt out by fringe proponents. Our policies make it far too easy for them. Good luck! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

I was just going to say the same. Good to see you again! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 14:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

And thanks for keeping an eye on the article. (Even if we disagree on other ones :P I still think it'd be good to have a well-sourced piece on abortion in art and literature, but I doubt I would ever be up for writing it.) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a big bunch. It's great to be editing again. Our disagreements are always handled in a civil manner, so they don't bother me at all. I like your sense of our sourcing policies. Keep up the great work! Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 07:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)