User talk:Lightspeed2012

Lightspeed2012, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Lightspeed2012! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

|Thanks --Lightspeed2012 16:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in science, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saltwater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC) FixedLightspeed2012 11:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anna Lore

The article Anna Lore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of films set in the future

Perhaps the Star Wars films have not been on the list because the very first film released opens with "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...". Lucas' comments on the time setting tend towards describing it in the past or in some way outside of known time... I'd certainly describe the films as "futuristic", but that doesn't necessarily mean "in the future". What do you think? Cheers Robevans123 (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, I'd say they're futuristic too. The Star Wars expanded universe spans about 30,000 to 200,000 years while the films cover about 100 years. Lightspeed2012 14:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Katharina Schwabroh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everyone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Would you please stop reverting 76.20.25.243 and try to understand such edits [1]? Materialscientist (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I think I made a massive mistake?? Lightspeed2012 03:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In those edits like [2], yes, because 76.20.25.243 was simply removing the redundant category (and also trying to better categorize Italians and such by region) but I haven't checked for other types of edits. Materialscientist (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I changed over 100 edits, revert them back. Lightspeed2012 03:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just please don't revert me (when reverting you) without explaining. Materialscientist (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: I meant to SAY I will NOT revert your edits. I hope we are at a good standing. Lightspeed2012 03:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The issue seems fixed. Mass reverts are always tricky, and even experienced editors like myself do them sometimes without understanding all details. Materialscientist (talk) 03:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Thnaks Lightspeed2012 04:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox is for everyone

While you may have been conducting a "test", the sandbox is for everyone and superloading it with irrel content in an attempt to break it, prevents those who do not have high speed connections from accessing the public space. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]