User talk:Ched

Archives, Recent, New

If anything

In the light of this I feel the above is the strongest admonishment that could possibly be justified. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:13, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and by the way, I edited your comments. On an arbcom case. I hope you're not furious. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

No problem I probably wont do much since it seems to be an isolated incident (and its not the first threat i've gotten on the internet I once got someone trying to get me to kill myself on another site and I am grateful it wasnt someone telling me to kill myself since that would set me off ) but i'll email wikimedia anyways Saturn star (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it's a crazy world out there - better safe than sorry. I did notify them, so someone named Jan may be able to help you. Good luck. — Ched : ? 02:19, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. — Ched : ?

You should be good to go. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 01:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, great. Thank you Salvidrim, very much appreciated. — Ched : ? 02:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again

kindness and constancy
Thank you for being the reliable source in person, trusting your friends even if people say they deceive you, teaching me vocabulary ("impervious to advice") and abbreviations (you know what I mean). Thank you for your faithful presence, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (5 October 2009)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were the 25th recipient of my Pumpkin Sky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gerda, you always do bring Joy to my heart (^Ref). (I'm learning to speak "metaphorical gospel") And to Remembering Friends. Best always, — Ched : ? 22:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Double joy: tomorrow DYK Geh aus, mein Herz, und suche Freud, my mother's favourite song, literally "Go out, my heart, and seek joy", and a nod. This was a good reminder of what we go for, and I added it to our project's goals ;) - Did you know that I am #3 in thank-you-clicks? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(almost forgot to reply) - congratulations on yet another of your wonderful DYK articles. Well done. And indeed, it is such a wonderful concept. I've been looking for an Americanized cover of the song, but haven't found one ... yet. :) — Ched : ? 06:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using your brain

Thanks for not doing a knee jerk reaction. I am no sock and calling an IP who refuses to register is what started this. Because you were professional and asked courteously I will comply with your request. I have been editing since at least 2005 so I know my way around foolishness. 172.56.6.142 (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got blocked for starting a SPI

I started an SPI about an article I came across that was around since 2006 and deleted and salted after a few attempts by User:RGloucester and some new accounts like User:Jobrot which is a SPA that states they are "noob" but then first edits in December 2014 in a discussion to delete the article using very sophisticated alphabet soup. Clearly not a noob and the edit analyzer shows a remarkable number of edits with the above sock master even though the sock only has a few hundred edits of which most show up in the edit analyzer with RGlocester who avows to be a Marxist on their talk page. The subject cultural Marxism in an modern American use does not say nice things about Marxists or cultural Marxists. It was nominated for deletion and theatrically argued for deletion by RGlocester and then a new SPA shows up arguing for the same thing out of no where. I do acknowledge it may be a meat puppet recruited by the sock master but a meat puppet is to be treated the same as a sock per WP:SOCK. I was accused of pretending to be new by Chillum but he fabricated that and accused me of being a sock and then blocked block me based on his ridiculous claims. I previously argued against User Talk:John Foxe for COI and his previous use of a sock. That will demonstrate that I always use an IP to edit and not what Chillum falsely accused me of. And John Foxe edits on behalf of Bob Jones University a very politically conservative fundamentalist school. That demonstrates I go after both extremes of the political spectrum. Cultural Marxism in an American sense reflects a conservative use of the philosophy. It was a valid article with 9 years of existence that was salted for Marxist ideological reasons. It is the worst case of WP:PUSH I have ever seen and a complete failure by involved admins. One reasonably would question if they had COI or in my opinion acted foolishly. If you got the time look into the salted SPI about RGloucester and check out the case I made. It demonstrates meat puppetry at the best and a sock puppetry in the worst. The edit analyzer and Jobrots contributions are very clear. It needs to see the light of day and not be immediately salted without examination. Again a foolish or malicious move by an editor. 172.56.6.142 (talk) 10:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]