Jump to content

Talk:Britney Spears/to do

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rogeliocm00 (talk | contribs) at 19:23, 20 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • To Prepare for FA STATUS, from Peer Review:
  • Sparse inline citations, and many of the ones that are there aren't high quality.
  • The Table of Contents is huge.
  • Get more critical analysis of her work (look up reviews in Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, newspapers of large cities, etc.).
  • Personal section is light on real substance
  • "Career achievments" is light on real substance.
  • Fill in 2 citations
  • Format the 2 added in link links into citations
  • Some pictures have network logos in them and the logos should be cropped out or another picture should be found as this is copyright infrigment
  • a cover picture of Rolling Stone in April 1999 is discussed, yet the cover is not pictured in the article.
  • It is mainly structural and syntactical issues like this that which separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
  • The See also list is also shockingly biased - essentially a list of lists which make Spears look good. I wonder if I should add List of people with the shortest marriages to balance it out!
  • the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup.
  • I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long.
  • I'd suggest getting rid of the subsections of "personal" and merging everything to get more prose.
  • Add that she was in a Girl Band before she was solo...but backed out of it

Erase the Academy Award nominated part from her name.