Suggestions from Citra

Hi Shelby! The first thing that caught my intention from your page is the picture of the tessarae locations. It was a great picture that supports your content of that section. You might want to add more caption on it to make it more descriptive. Generally, your page is pretty well-organized. However, under the Formation section, instead of breaking the section to Models then breaking it down again to the different models, you may want to consider just breaking it down directly to the different type of models. So, for instance, you may want to organize it like:

  3. Formation
      3.1 Mantle Upwelling Model
      3.2 Lava Ponds Model

Also, there were a few places where I have problem understanding the concept, so you may want to put more description to it. I notice minor grammatical errors, but overall your content is pretty great so far. Planetarysprotege (talk) 03:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew

Good to see you landed on a classification scheme, I was having trouble picking one to use as well. Page looks good, and the image is great. I noticed a couple of typos:

" Tessera Terrain do not participate in the global resurfacing events of Venus.

The most recent data concerning tessera terrain comes from the Magellan Mission, in which the majority of Venus's surface was mapped in high resolution (~100 m/pixel).

Other than that, can you get images of a tesserae that may illustrate the different categories. I don't know if Megellan images are usable on wiki, but it would help the reader see the different types.

Awebb6 (talk) 05:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]