Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000
LalaResne
LalaResne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Mangoeater1000 (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LalaResne. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LalaResne.
07 March 2015
– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Dustylappss (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Cleatword (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Thankcocoa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Slooppouts34 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
By a certain time, the Islam page is subject to the interventions from new created users working a short distance from each other and pushing the same pov, both in discussion and edit page. Now this is happening again: users LaResne was been referred to as unreliable and Clearwod and Dustylappss reappears, pushing in the edit section the same POV:https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Islam&offset=&limit=500&action=history This happened and also it is now happening in talk page as well, from Talk:Islam#Slavery_in_Islam thi on. Going on for several months, so much material has accumulated, but one thing is certain: their entries were and are highly questionable, and none of them were accepted by the community both in talk and edit page. But they push them together anyway, creating a continuous edit wars. They all appeared after user Slooppouts34, that pushed the same POV of them, but he is not posting from some time. CallAng222 (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- LalaResne, Dustylappss and Thankcocoa accounts were created 2, 7 and 11 january; they all heavely (almnost only) edited one page alone, Islam. Cleatword stop posting 18 february, 15 february LalaResne also stop posting. Both resume posting the same day - 5 march - both editing the same page - Islam. Slooppouts34 and Dustylapps both stop posting 27 January (also Thankcocoa stop his post in this day); both resume posting 6 march. Where? In the same page of Cleatword and LalaResne. Both Slop1and Dusty2revert the same thing; used the same sentences 34the same sentences tha used an even older user, banned by TParis because “Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia: point of view pushing”: Helpwoks!56(here again Slop repeats words by words Helpwoks sentences 7) Again dusty 8 and lala 9 pushing the same pov in edit pages; participating in the same edit war, the same day, together with Clerwod 101112. Dusty 13 and Thankcocoa 14 again pushing the same pov. LaLaResne his now banned for 24 hours; slop15 reappers to push a pov of Cleatword16 in yet another edit war; Slop and LaLaResne also liked to cite the same openwiki 1718 It's the first time for me dealing with this kind of thing. Please let me know if something else is neeeded, thank you. CallAng222 (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
As determined long time ago here [1] User CallAng22 is definitely a sockpuppet with an agenda but was not blocked as no one wanted to do the hard work of filing SPI. He claims he dealing with such thing for the first time, but as proven from his account history, he only edits Islam article, and account was created for the sole purpose of editwarring. And the account is also very new.--Slooppouts34 (talk) 01:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Additional information needed - CallAng222, please provide some diffs to show the connection between those accounts (Like similar edits, similar comments, similar edit summaries, etc... ). Vanjagenije (talk) 00:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Clerk endorsed based on the provided diffs. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)