Jump to content

Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eric-92 (talk | contribs) at 02:10, 12 March 2015 (→NEW REQUESTS: Johanne Fenger : support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Closing instructions

"WP:PM" redirects here. For requesting to move or rename a page, see Wikipedia:Requested moves. For page history mergers, see Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen.
Shortcuts

The discussion about merging at the village pump is now archived (here). The vast majority of those who expressed an opinion considered the system based on the current templates and this process (Wikipedia:Proposed mergers) to be inadequate.

The implementation of a new automated system is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Merge/Archive 2#Automation of merge proposals. More participation in that discussion is welcome.

This page lists proposed article mergers as a supplement to the merge categories and templates; it is meant for discussing possible mergers and does not replace any of the other steps in the merger process. Please add the appropriate merger tag(s) to the articles before listing them here.

How to propose a merger

Main page: Help:Merging

There are three types of mergers on Wikipedia:

  1. mergers that are so obviously necessary and appropriate that no one is expected to object;
  2. mergers that would benefit from discussion with the other editors at the affected articles about whether and/or how to perform the merge; and
  3. mergers that are controversial or potentially difficult to carry out, and therefore need assistance from uninvolved editors in determining whether to merge the pages.

If the pages that you would like to merge fall into the first group, then it is not necessary to propose a merger at all. You should boldly do the merger now, without formally proposing it. (In the event that someone unexpectedly objects, then the merger can be undone easily, and you can formally propose the merger for discussion at that time.)

If a formal discussion is wanted, then proposing a merger can be done in three steps:

  1. Create a place for discussion. Go to the Talk Page (also known as the discussion page) of the TARGET ARTICLE (the one you want to merge to) and create a section (eg: "Merger proposal") to discuss the merger. If there's already a discussion on the talk page regarding the merger, you can omit this step. Whether the discussion is new or old, make sure the discussion section names all articles involved and links to them. The section name can be anything that includes the word merge (for example ==Merger proposal==).
  2. Put one of the merger tags at the top of the articles you wish to be merged. The templates {{Merge from}} and {{Merge to}}, or {{merge}} are the most common ones. Remember to make sure that the Discuss link in each tag points to the section you've created in step 1 (this is to prevent having two separate discussions on different talk pages).
  3. If the proposed merge is controversial or potentially difficult to carry out, follow the directions under #Requests for merge assistance and feedback to add it to the list.

Many bold mergers are performed each day. Of the mergers that are formally proposed, about 95% fall into the second category, of wanting discussion or practical assistance from the editors at the articles that are to be merged. The remaining 5% of formally proposed mergers are on contentious topics or are controversial for one reason or another. Only this small fraction is listed at the bottom of this page as instructed in step #3.

Requests for merge assistance and feedback

If you need outside feedback regarding mergers that are either tricky or of a controversial nature, please do the following:

  • Tag the article as shown above
  • Create a discussion as shown above
  • Notify the talk page of the appropriate Wikiproject to get knowledgeable people to comment on it. (To find out which Wikiproject the page is associated with, check the associated talk page. It should be tagged with a template, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey.)
  • If there is consensus to merge, but the merge is difficult, contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Merge for assistance.

For other topics:

  • If you need help with renaming or moving, consult Help:Moving a page.
  • Cut and paste move fixes: If you have merged an article by this method, then you need to request page histories to be merged; list them at cut and paste move repairs. Please DO NOT perform further moves by cut and paste.

NOTE: Do not Post Here if You are Not Willing to do the Merge Yourself. We will provide you assistance in how to complete the merge if you are unsure how to do it. -Project Merge
NOTE: Please do not re-list old merge proposals that are already tagged and in the "to Merge" queue (including requests made up to two years ago), as these will be handled as we get to them. -Project Merge

NEW REQUESTS

If you need assistance with proposing a merge, list it below and someone will make sure it's properly listed. Note that this will not get the merge completed, as there is a large merge backlog. Once a merge is listed properly, move it to the "Completed requests" or "Awaiting consensus" sections below as appropriate.

Please list new requests at the BOTTOM of this section. Use the Edit Summary and list at least a link to the article to be redirected. Please legitimize your request by signing each listing or comment by typing four tildes (~~~~):


Oppose. Look again, better yet, withdraw this nomination due to possible error in judgement. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 07:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Strongly disagree with Poeticbent and thank you not to include POV in talk. Subcamps are not historically notable for their names, because they were not given names. See [[1]]. Very simple to observe that subcamps were redirected to the geographical areas where they were located, because the subcamps did not have proper names. Treatment of Malchow concentration camp nonstandard and nonperformant. Stan94301 (talk) 16:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


AWAITING CONSENSUS

Once tagged, request should be added here. This section can also be used if an old proposal needs further discussion. We will attempt to get more people to comment on it.

  • Merge Investigative Project on Terrorism into Steven Emerson. There is no such entity as the Investigative Project on Terrorism, and much of the information included in the current article belongs in an article under the actual organization which is The Investigative Project on Terrorism Foundation founded in April 2006. There is also a separate entity, The Investigative Project, and the Steven Emerson article where some of the information belongs. Everything is being lump summed under an invalid article. Atsme☯Consult 17:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
*Note: Discussion belongs on the article page which survives the merger (the "target page"), not the one which will become a redirect. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Kollam Airport into Asramam Maidan; The two articles overlap in that they describe the same open space which once used to be a landing ground in the 1930s (not an airport, as claimed). I propose that the "airport article be merged into the history section of Asramam Maidan article in order to provide more accurate coverage of the topic. --Trinidade (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Cheers! bd2412 T 17:18, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANSWERED REQUESTS

After discussion concludes, completed requests should be moved below. Please mark as {{Done}}; {{Not Done}}; {{Working}} when consensus has been reached.

 Done -- phoebe / (talk to me) 03:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- phoebe / (talk to me) 07:13, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by someone, though could use double-checking, looks like it was just redirected. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 03:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done only comment opposes merge due to lack of quality of the target article. Complete rewrite would be necessary. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Working; although opposition has been expressed, both articles are non-independantly sourced going on five years, and there has been no attempts at improvement through the corse of this discussion. No reason why proposer or someone familiar with the subject(s) should not proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:10, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge
Mosaics within Mosaics to Circulatory System Circulatory System (band). Discussion >>>HERE<<< Wgolf (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus Wgolf (talk) 16:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-I put a AFD on it as well for the time being as this is an album with no info that is coming soon. (If someone who knows about the band can come in-great) Wgolf (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2014 (UTC) [reply]
Note: The AfD debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The AfD debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
into List of MacGyver characters. Discussion is >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 06:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge
Lennie Godber
Mr. Mackay
Lukewarm (Porridge)
McClaren (Porridge)
Mr. Barrowclough
Harry Grout
Blanco Webb
Norman Stanley Fletcher
into Porridge (TV series). Discussion is >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Only comments after four months favor the mass-merges of the request. Someone familiar with the subject should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Salawat (now redirected to Peace be upon him (Islam)) and Durood. Reason given: The articles seems to indicate that Salawat is Arabic of Durood. Also, sending Peace, Salutations, Blessings , etc on the Muhammad all usually refer to similar things, with some slight but significant difference in the meaning of the words. The difference comes in usage of different phrases. E.g.- one kind of phrase used after mentioning his name and another kind of phrase used in Salah. Rather a sub-topic should be used to mention the difference (Note: Naat is not used for this merger, which removed previous merge request) Verycuriousboy (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by Simp Redir (non-sourced). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 09:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Working
Currently being discussed at here. Main issue is what is the official name of the system, and which direction should the merge proceed? --Gccwang (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge:
    • UMTS-FDD (Stub) into UMTS (section FDD) with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology.
    • UMTS-TDD (Stub) into UMTS (section TDD) with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology.
    • W-CDMA (UMTS) into UMTS with proposed redirection — duplication of topic - both articles address the same technology. Nightwalker-87 (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and after >14 months nobody responded, see Talk:TNT N.V.#Merger proposal. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No opposition after more than one year. --Gccwang (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly the same person. I would suggest Iliana Iotova as the merged spelling, as it is used on her European Parliament page. Place Clichy (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


RECENT ARCHIVES

September 2014
Both these articles are on the controversial topic of Dorje Shugden and the merger may be controversial as well — so I think it would be helpful if experienced editors could keep an eye on this. I've notified all recent editors of these articles of the merger proposal - except those editors who are blocked or have edited with only an IP address. Chris Fynn (talk) 21:51, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Page on the campaign of a politician who withdrew two months prior to the election date after polling in the single digits. Downwoody (talk) 05:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge
Hannah Palemoon,
Walter Moon, and
Tsion Ben-Judah into List of Left Behind characters. Discuss it >>>Here<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


August 2014
May 2014
Note: pre-merge copy edit reverted by @Andy Dingley: without comment re:merge proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: pre-merge copy edit reverted by @Andy Dingley: without comment re:merge proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
April 2014
Probably should happen; no opposition being voiced; would more than likely survive bold merge at this time. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done boldly. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge
Terry Fitzgerald,
Wanda Blake,
and many others (see page) into List of Spawn characters. Discussion >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No opposition expressed; a series of bold merges should proceed from proposer or an interested editor. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No opposition expressed; a series of bold merges should proceed from proposer or an interested editor. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No opposition to mergers has been voiced so far. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Notice posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics for their help with merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merger proposal for Zona Histórica de San Juan (San Juan Historic Site) with Old San Juan, Puerto Rico: I propose that Zona Histórica de San Juan be merged into Old San Juan, Puerto Rico. I think that the content in the "Zona Histórica de San Juan" article can easily be explained in the context of the Old San Juan article, and the Old San Juan article is of a reasonable size that the merging of "Zona Histórica de San Juan" will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Discuss >>>HERE<<<. Osvaldo Ocasio (talk) 03:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No opposition to merger has been voiced so far. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
March 2014
Target page has been moved to Disney Channel (Southeast Asia); light discussion shows no opposition and consensus to proceed with merger; Nom. or other interested user should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Target page has been moved from Disney Channel (Southeast Asia) back to original, Disney Channel (Asia); light discussion still hows no opposition and consensus to proceed with merger; Nom. or other interested user should proceed.
Comments so far favor the merge. Could probably survive a bold merge at this point. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Alternative proposal to move merge in opposite direction has arisen from discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Precedent favors the merge. Discussion, however, is divided. More input will be requested. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either merge:
  1. Zimný štadión Pavla Demitru to Pavol Demitra Ice Stadium
    ~OR~
  2. Pavol Demitra Ice Stadium to Zimný štadión Pavla Demitru]. Both articles are about the same ice hockey stadium in Slovakia and I don't know about any naming conventions regarding stadium names (whether local name or English translation should be used). Most of the articles about stadiums in Slovakia, however, use the local name. Discussion >>here<<. stclaus (talk) 16:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done; simpRedir GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either Merge:
  1. Commercial products and entities to List of companies named after people
    ~OR~
  2. List of companies named after people to Commercial products and entities. Seeing as how both listings essentially contain the same information, there shouldn't be TWO listings of companies named after people. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 04:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: No consensus to merge after long discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by interested editor. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge
should all be merged to List of Moomin characters. Lack of reliable third person sources. Dissussion is >>>HERE<<< Dwanyewest (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by interested editor. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
February 2014
be merged to List of Viz comic strips. Lack of reliable third person sources. Dissussion is >>>HERE<<< Dwanyewest (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Moot; already done. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
be merged to Charlie's Angels. Lack of reliable third person sources. >>>HERE<<< Dwanyewest (talk) 03:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done boldly by interested user. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Could probably survive bold merge by proposer, as there has been no opposition to the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Cnilep (talk) 03:28, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
January 2014
1) Please comment on talk page and merge them: Anyang_LG_Cheetahs and FC Seoul; Discuss >>>HERE<<<;
 Working  Done; Consensus is to Merge; proposer or someone familiar with subject should do so. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
and:
2) Please comment on talk page and merge them: Pusan_Daewoo_Royals and Busan IPark. >>>Discussion HERE<<<; Thanks. Footwiks (talk) 10:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Working  Done; Consensus is to Merge; proposer or someone familiar with subject should do so. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done; closed as merge by simple redirect by User:BDD (ping).
Go ahead. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Working;
Comment Recent events may have rendered this request moot. More input required. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Closed by User:Tokyogirl79 as no consensus to merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by simple redirect refocus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 07:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
should all be merged into Characters of Blake's 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Discuss these merger requests >>>HERE<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
December 2013
  • Discussion has added:
all into List of Viz comic strips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Discuss these mergers >>>Here<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 07:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A consensus seems to have developed to merge these into a list article of some sort. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cooter Davenport;
Abraham Lincoln Hogg; and
Boss Hogg;
All into the The Dukes of Hazzard. Discussion >>>Here<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Either Merge:
  1. Commercial products and entities to List of companies named after people
    ~OR~
  2. List of companies named after people to Commercial products and entities. Seeing as how both listings essentially contain the same information, there shouldn't be TWO listings of companies named after people. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 04:33, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Carolyn Stoddard;
Daniel Collins (Dark Shadows);
Andreas Petofi; and
Angelique Bouchard Collins; All into the List of Dark Shadows characters. Discussion of >>>Here<<<. Dwanyewest (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
November 2013
 Working. New discussion not gaining any more participants. Old discussion awaiting bold merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Wrong noticeboard. Please see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion.
 Done, by simple redirect. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:59, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
October 2013
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:57, 14 October 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:40, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus discussion >>>here<<<. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a no-brainer. Proposer should proceed with the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jimmy Slade into the List of Baywatch characters Dwanyewest (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neely Capshaw into the List of Baywatch charactersDwanyewest (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lani McKenzie into the List of Baywatch charactersDwanyewest (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ben Edwards (Baywatch) into the List of Baywatch charactersDwanyewest (talk) 00:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Two separate entities with no commercial connection to each other besides company founder Griffin. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:20, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
If these articles are indeed about the same person, proposer should proceed to merge per policy. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:39, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the location of the discussion as a discussion had already started there. I also believe, as said by another user, that Giorgos Konstantinou (actor) is a better target. Place Clichy (talk) 23:24, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Articles tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC) [reply]
 Done (see below)
-also-
Tagged both proposals separately. This is a two-step proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable. The former article has been an orphan since its inception. Proposer should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced missing MERGE TAG at target article. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me"
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC) [reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • These:
  1. Rose (Street Fighter character) redirected Rose (Street Fighter)Dwanyewest (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Birdie (Street Fighter character) redirected into Birdie (Street Fighter)Dwanyewest (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sodom (Street Fighter) redirected into Sodom (Final Fight). Dwanyewest (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yang (Street Fighter character), Yun (Street Fighter character), Yun (Street Fighter), Yang (Street Fighter) redirected into Yun and Yang Dwanyewest (talk) 23:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator should proceed with mergers. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Little input or discussion; precedent suggests this should happen (see Leader – Leadership; etc.). Nominator should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:25, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Proceed with merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done along with many others, by simple redirect. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done along with many others. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No discussion needed per stated policy: "Obvious." Proposer or someone interested should go ahead and do the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No discussion needed per stated policy. Proposer should go ahead and do the merge of Bondi Raiders into Raiders (gridiron club)#History. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with article move to Lady Windermere's Fan (1944 film). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
No discussion needed per stated policy. Proposer should go ahead and do the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. These are historically two locations and will probably never be merged into an all encompassing article. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
=>Moved to Template Noticeboard for Merger discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Allegheny_Energy into FirstEnergy. As both articles indicate, the latter bought the former company over two years ago. I was going to add some content on a current news issue about one of their facilities, but the now-defunct company is now part of the larger business which is generating that news. See the URL for AE which redirects to FE.--Trep26 (talk) 02:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale proposal not gaining consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale prop; however, could possibly survive a bold merge by someone knowledgeable about the subject(s). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Brecht's poetry into Bertolt Brecht. The article is organized as an essay, the title is not properly formatted, hints of violating policies regarding original research. Currently there is very little discussion of Brecht's poetry at the Bertold Brecht biography article--a rather strange omission that stands out given his prominence in early 20th century poetry. Join the discussion >>>Here<<<. (NOTE: First time doing this here, so please make sure I did it right.) --ColonelHenry (talk) 04:55, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
September 2013
 Not done. The one is a district, the other is a town. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Judge for yourself: Dancing Queen[3] and Mercy[4] Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 08:17, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • History of Rotherham United F.C. was proposed for a merger 3 years ago. Not much discussion went on, so I am asking for feedback on whether you think the page should be merged into Rotherham United F.C. or not. Please note I am trying to get the latter article featured so detailed information and references will be of massive help from that page. And apologies if I have posted this in the wrong section, I'm new to this type of stuff on wikipedia.
Discussion !here!. Rocky miller 97 "Chat" 02:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus discussion favors the merge. Do it. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you're requesting here. This merge and redirect already took place back in 2004. Please clarify. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
August 2013
 Done by prop. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagged and awaiting consensus.
Appears non-controversial. Proposer should proceed per own request. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale proposal awaiting bold merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
July 2013
 Done Merge has already taken place. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is to merge by Snow. Proposer should do the merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion >>>here<<<.
 Not done Stale proposal awaiting merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
>>>Discussion here<<<. Seems non-controversial and probably should happen. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale merge request awaiting implementation. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done
 Done partially. Original defining article is now a stub needing referencing and additional cited content. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 17:54, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: Stale merger request awaiting future implementation. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
June 2013
 Done
 Done: Finished incomplete merger and redirect. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 14:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: Stale merger request awaiting future implementation. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 10:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 09:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Appears correct. Proposer, or someone knowledgeable about the subject, should proceed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hans Hopfen and Hans von Hopfen are two articles about the same person and content on exactly the same topic. So, I believe they should be merged. I've put the templates described in WP:Merge, but, as I'm not contributor of the English Wikipedia I don't think I will be able to follow this proposal. Can someone takes care about it, please? Tpt (talk) 09:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non controversial and should happen. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Finished incomplete merger. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Only input after relisting is opposed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed that the Awake (TV series) character articles be merged together to a character list article or main article:

The discussion is >>>here<<< 65.94.76.126 (talk) 00:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done No consensus to merge at this time. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 18:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

History of Palestinian nationality → History of the Palestinian people (>>>discuss<<<): proposal submitted more than a year ago, but received no responses from editors (neither support or opposition).Greyshark09 (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - No consensus to merge at this time. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done no consensus to merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No consensus to merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done by consensus (WP:Snow). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
May 2013
Seems a straightforward merge is in order into the "History" section of United Continental Holdings. Same company, different name now. Go ahead. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect were reversed. Need further input for consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Stale proposal with no interest to merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013
 Not done "Not a cover..." GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Consensus is no merge (WP:Snow). GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to request the merging of the various pages about the National Assembly of Pakistan into the article History of Pakistan National Assembly. I know that articles exist about the 3th, 4th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th National Assembly of Pakistan. Please consider it. Thank you. NeoFriskus (talk) 7:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
These should all be merged. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:39, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is growing to NOT MERGE to the proposed target. Ideas welcome. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done by consensus. List of proposed states of the United States merged into 51st state. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged, awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. This proposal involves converting a list into a full-blown article. There are problems with this in that the list is transcluded into List of newspapers in the United States#Wyoming. Note the comment on the top of that file--a similar comment is on other analogous state lists as well:

!-- Note to future editors: this article is copied by transclusion into the article "List of newspapers in the United States". Only include links here unless you plan to rewrite that article to use part of the list here, such as for listing only major papers on the main page. Include anything relevant to this page only - things that should only show on this page and not be carried back to the main article - by placing it between blocks. Also, make sure there is nothing - no CR - before a if one is not to be included in the upstream article, or occurs after the , or an extra blank line will be sent back to the calling article

This proposal should be made on a global 50-state basis, not on a single state, to maintain consistency across states. Wbm1058 (talk) 16:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged. Awaiting consensus or a bold merge by someone more familiar with these subjects. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Partial consolidation of the articles involved have now taken place (Multani dialect→Multani language; Thalochi→Thalochi dialect). Additional input, however, will be required for finding consensus for the rest. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed several broken and reverted Redirects that involved sockpuppetry and blocked editors. It's a mess. NOTE: I crossed out what's already been merged. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Closing this as done. The original proposal is 80% complete, and no further movement on the remaining two items seems evident. (They can be re-proposed if needed in the future.) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged, awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Article creator (and merge requester) withdrew the proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge now taking place. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 08:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Working The incomplete merge was made by an IP (95.141.31.4) on March 3, 2013. Since then, the merger was reversed with the discussion continuing here. There will need to be administrative or supervisory input to close this apparently divisive proposal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Boldly by an IP. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: requested further input from Wikipedia:WikiProject Miami {{WikiProject Miami tasks}} – Wbm1058 (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus seems to favor the merge. Someone familiar with the subject should go ahead and do it. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – Neighborhoods where notability has not been established were not merged. Wbm1058 (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I suspect you were looking at the redirect. The original redirect was accomplished nearly a year ago; however, another stub-version of the redirected article reappeared recently. It has since been redirected. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
March 2013
Tagged awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Requested additional input from WP:Sports. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus appears to have developed to merge. Go ahead. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
Tagged awaiting discussion. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems non-controversial. Go ahead and merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Straightforward. Go ahead and proceed. (No need to list here unless you can't do the merge yourself.) Do you need help? GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:21, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, still new to this whole thing. Pages have been merged. Thanks. ToastyMallows (talk) 16:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
  • A merge request between Wuffa of East Anglia and Wuffingas was proposed, without the normal procedure being followed. Several editors have opposed or commented on the proposed merge. I have closed the discussion as nothing has been added to it for several weeks. Please can an experienced administrator help reach a consensus? Hel-hama (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sent to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure#Article_namespace for closure request. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probable situation where you can be bold and just do it, especially if no one is objecting. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Has turned into a divisive proposal with no consensus to merge, redirect, or delete. Good luck. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Requested additional input from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music#Noticeboard. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this appears to have been discussed about 4 years ago, also.
 Not done per consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged, awaiting consensus; and requested further input from WikiProject Sports and Television. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No consensus reached after almost two months. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done This noticeboard is for help with the actual merging process, not a discussion forum. That takes place on the target article Talk page. Anyway, the merger is already a done deal. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The merge discussion has not been closed. Proposed mergers can be used if an old proposal needs more discussion (see Wikipedia:Proposed_mergers#Current_requests, which it what Help Desk recommended, and Kkk posted an opinion in the merge disucssion, so Kkk has a conflict with performing the merge. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged; should be non-controversial; go ahead and merge, Dipralb. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 08:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notified as  Done by Dipralb. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
February 2013
Tagged awaiting consensus.
Stalled and needs further input. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Requested additional comments from WP:TV. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done no consensus to merge "At This Time." GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge low budget films article: [Discussion moved from Village pump (proposals):] I propose that the low-budget film article be merged into the Z movie and B movie articles, but not the z movie and b movie articles. Could someone please propose this for merger for me, since I am an IP address or else I would do it myself. Thanks! :-) --Able
Discussion Here (B Movie) and Here (Z Movie)
I don't quite follow. Do you want to propose merging Low-budget film into Z movie and B movie, but keep Z movie and B movie separate? If you go to the talk page (I will watch all three for a while) and add you reasoning I will add the templates. AIRcorn (talk) 09:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have copied this request/discussion to the Wikipedia:Proposed mergers notice-board. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Requested additional comments from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done no support. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note to everyone involved Eng.Bandara has been indef blocked as a sock as per this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Distributor108.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No action due to nom POV-pushing by sock-puppetry. May be re-introduced by another editor. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:32, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:31, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge now taking place. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 08:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The apparently reverted merge and re-opened discussion is duplicated above (in March 2013).
  • Mattel v. MCA Records should be merged with Barbie Girl - A WP:BOLD merge was undone by User:TJRC, citing "court case is more than song, also defamation; having a separate article allows legal issues to be discussed that would be off-topic here." This is an invalid rationale being that the lawsuit happened as a direct result of the song making fun of Barbie and bearing its name. Had the song been named something else, it would not have happened. Since the lawsuit has been settled, it is very unlikely that any new information will come up in the near future (even if that was the case, a merge can easily be undone). Starting a discussing would be rather pointless because Mattel v. MCA Records is a low class article not watched by many editors and had minimal edits since its creation over three years ago. This is how the merged article looks like and it seems perfectly okay by me. Before it is done again, though, I suggest you speak one-on-one with User:TJRC because he will likely revert it, being the only editor opposing a merge of any kind. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably the wrong noticeboard for your request, as the merge has already happened (even though it was subsequently reversed). Have/Did you start(ed) a discussion along these lines at the article Talk? That should be a first step, then you would have Third Opinion or Comment requests available to you. From the results of that forum, the article can be brought to Mediation, Arbitration, or even AfD if warranted. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
MOOT This is a simple move request, and the wrong spot to post it. Use the article's talk page or use the "Move" button on the article. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The "merge" has apparently already taken place by Cut 'N Paste. Marking as completed. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 06:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Requested input from WikiProject United States members. GenQuest (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, not enough input, no consensus. Proposal withdrawn. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus reached to go ahead and merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 23:32, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done
Both articles started the same day by the same person, who may have a vested interest in them (re: User:The N factor). I have tagged for merge proposal, but they may well be AfD candidates as well. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 12:50, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done non-contentious/controversial merges; renamed and redirected; complete. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There is a discussion on talk page: Talk:Araeomolis#Merger_Proposal. I strongly oppose merger. Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit conflict] This seems to be a contentious proposal as a near edit-war has broken out over just tagging the articles for discussion. I started to tag the articles, and then realized they had already been tagged several times, each having been subsequently removed. I'm not going to waste my time to further tag them all. I posted a list of the affected articles at the discussion sight. (It may be better to take this to AfD.) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, discussion closed, see Talk:Araeomolis#Merger_Proposal. I will remove the tags. Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done nominator withdrew request by consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal tagged since 2009, just posted here as of December 2012; Need further input to confirm these are the same guy. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 15:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done marked for merge to take place by Felbick.
DISCUSSION.GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I told you, German user Felbick needs help. I dont understand how to merge.Felbick (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Taking place at User:Felbick/Lorenz Christoph Mizler GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
January 2013
Go ahead and merge. They are the same thing. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done
Tagged and awaiting consensus. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 21:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done There is no consensus to merge at this time; and the 2012 Central African Republic rebellion article is now huge and well referenced. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 03:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GenQuest "Talk to Me" 01:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mona Sikhs into Sikh(discuss). The former is a subsect of the latter, and while the former's article is short on detail, history, etc., the latter's article is quite complete and well-rounded, and would benefit greatly from a more complete and thorough coverage of the subject, while reducing effort and minimizing duplication of work. besiegedtalk 23:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see a reason not to do it–both articles are about the same procedure/process. Go ahead and proceed. Non-contentious. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Already  Done
Could this be closed now? Thank you. It's a minority interest, the discussion is unlikely to gain any more contributors but appears to fall to the 'oppose' side. --Iyo-farm (talk) 06:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done; Consensus is opposed to merging
 Not done; no consensus
  • Merged to refined sub-article instead of over-arching League article as requested – made more sense.
 Done
Agreed, Obviously same person. Non-contentious. Go ahead and merge. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done
2012 Archives
December 2012
 Done non-contentious; went ahead and merged. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
November 2012
  • Yes, please can an admin history merge the sandbox into the article? We took a copy into the sandbox and edited it there with the intent to dump it back at the end, but in the end multiple editors were involved in the sandbox editing. By the way, well done finding this page MoonSwan999! --99of9 (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done technically the wrong venue use {{histmerge}} --Salix (talk): 09:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's why I thought I'd better explain it. But finding this is not bad for a beginner. Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 09:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
October 2012
Complete concesus reached on talk page. Thanks for all the input. -- :- ) Don 16:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012

• I need help moving the Controversy section of the Joan Juliet Buck into either the Asma al-Assad article and/or the Criticism section of Vogue. It overwhelms the profile. Buck seems to have been commissioned for the piece by Vogue, al-Assad's husband is responsible for many atrocities in his own county, and these points that are lost by keeping it in under Joan Juliet Buck.--Aichikawa (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially, what we are trying to do here is create a new master page, or super-categorisation, for all two cylinder engines leading to sub- or child pages for individual configurations.

The intention here is to resolve a problem that has arisen relating to the three main groups of 'non-V' or 'non-flat' twins, i.e. transverse or parallel twins, inline or longitudinal twins, and tandem twins. At present three configurations are being shoehorned into a single article called "Straight-two engine", which arguably is a far more obscure and minor terminology for some engine configurations and not used widely by manufacturers. The previously unreferenced topic being started by a non-native English speaker, sometime ago and the preponderance of references suggesting this does not meet Wikipedia naming conventions, as per WP:NAME; Recognizability, Naturalness, Precision, Conciseness, Consistency, English language use etc.
The idea is as sufficient content arises, new child page can be developed off the new parent. --Bridge Boy (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that Bridge Boy has been blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing, etc. It is generally held by involved editors that this merger proposal was an element of his disruptiveness (is that a word?). I suggest that these merger talks be closed with the decision not to merge. Thank you. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Proposed by blocked user in violation of block. Ego White Tray (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012



All articles tagged for merging

This section is updated by Merge bot.

See also

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Proposed_article_mergers&oldid=650988767"