Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tyruler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Tyruler

Evidence

Removal of unsigned notice [1]. Andjam 15:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anon IP signing as Tyruler [2]. Andjam 15:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Anon IP has received several warnings for vandalism to Council on American-Islamic Relations, as seen on User talk:24.225.226.57, and is continuing to focus mainly on that article. Andjam 15:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tyruler has also been warned for vandalising a CAIR-related article. Andjam 15:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalistic blanking by sockpuppet. [3] Andjam 15:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Removal of unsigned notice, Anon IP signing as Tyruler.

I am new to Wikipedia and have made contributions without being signed in, that explains the AnonIP charge. I posted without signing in, but I thought that a legal wiki policy. Its truly sad how the user andjam is going through a litany of charges to block me. Truly sad indeed...

Anon IP has received several warnings for vandalism

However the case here goes deeper than the hollow accusation of "sock puppet." It goes to the heart of an edit war and revision I made to the article CAIR. In one goes to the discussion webpage of the article, one can clearly see two users Andjam and sdedeo use intimidating tactics and other tools at their arsenal to block users and to quell dissent. I have tried earnestly to work with them to revise the article, where I put an NPOV tag up, only to find that the tag keeps being removed. Then finally when its not removed, all of my edits are deleted and told they do not adhere to "NPOV." If one goes to the discussion page to the CAIR article, they'd find that the user Sdedeo had requested secretly the help of Andjam to prevent anyone from adding or challenging any biased quotes. To them the article is perfect as it stands and can not tolerate and accept a difference of opinion.

What's worse is the two users esp. Andjam of leveling accusations against me of being a vandal and a sockpuppet of blank pages.

First of all, I've never heard of those terminology until now. Second of all, I know that I unintentionally saved half a page, causing the other to remain blank. That mistake was being heralded by andjam as evidence of my vandalism and subsequent block form Wiki.

However, I have no doubt that all of these accusations are being carried out to silence me and keep me from editing the CAIR page and other editors having to deal with me. As sdedeo alerts his buddy andjam: that I lost my patience with this guy, but would be happy if YOU'D JOIN the discussion.

No doubt he has joined the discussion. Just with the litany of charges, including blanking, vandalism, deletion, sock puppet. etc. Andjam even approached kimchi.sg to put me on block, but to no avial. So he has yet again added another rationale to block me, I'm sock puppet. As Bart would say, "Ay caramba!" Never knew the world of Wiki was loaded with online bullies such as them, who use every page in the book to malign naive Wikipedians. Don't be surprised if another charge is levied against me, maybe personal attack, huh? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tyruler (talk • contribs) .

The anon IP received 5 warnings or similar from 4 users in April. Were they also the result of accidents? Andjam 10:22, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This anon IP address was the same and it as done before I registered my IP address with wiki. Back then, I was unfamiliar with the workings of Wiki and edited the grossly inaccurate content on CAIR only to be bullied by users such as yourself as conducting vandalism. A charge which infuriated me since all I thought I did was edit this page as per the instruction on top of each Wiki webpage, only to learn that was considered illegal and vandalism. Again I'd appreciate it if you stop playing every card in your book to prevent me from contributing to articles such as CAIR including reverting my entire edits because you found two sentences out of 5 paragraphs to be "NPOV" Tyruler 00:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to close this as "inconclusive" because I am going to assume good faith and say that he did just forgot to sign in, but obviously that means he would have to physically type his username, instead of ~~~~. Iolakana|^T 14:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]