Talk:Lego Island 2: The Brickster's Revenge

Lego Start‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

legoland

legoland is very fun to play it has very fun games to play legoland is better than lego land 2

Release date?

Where did October come from? I got Lego Island 2 in July 2001. Josh (talk | contribs) 15:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The bulls castle

Can anyone post a picture of the bull's castle from this game, since it was not a set, I would like to see a picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.188.238.12 (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks just likes the lions, but with a different color scheme.

Then again, since they appear to be made out of stone, they could be completely original! See Ya', tfullwood 15:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfullwood (talk • contribs)

Interesting Discovery...

I've recently (by recently I mean months ago) discovered that (even in the minimum install, despite slow loading screens) that the dialouge files are saved on the hard drive, in .wav format! Most amazing, is that there is some dialouge never used in the game (and i've won the game), some suggesting a game more similar to LEGO Island 1, e.g. to get the brickster bot's heads, you'd CLICK ON THEM! See Ya', tfullwood 15:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfullwood (talk • contribs)

How can nobody have commented on this yet!? Oh, by the way - by the GBA version, it's much better. Tx2Fullwood (talk) 15:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Game plot

While the article contains the story for the PC/Playstation version of the game in the Plot section, it does not cover the GBA and GBC versions of the story, which are extremely different (For instance, the Constructopedia doesn't play any part in the GBC version at all, other then a small mention by the Infomaniac). I own the game for PC, PS1, and GBC, however, I do not own the GBA version (Though I have played a little bit of it). There is a walkthrough of it on YouTube however, so I should be able to write a section on the GBA plot by watching that, unless somebody here owns it. Jamesster.LEGO (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"All plot" and other clean-up

Although it has been suggested that we expand upon the plot summary to cover the handheld versions, I have added {{All plot}} to the list of issues atop the page. As the article currently stands, it is mostly centered around the game's plot. I have slimmed the plot down a little as part of my clean-up edit, but I'm sure that such an in-depth summary is not needed and more extraneous information can be cut out.

More importantly, the article needs more expansive coverage of gameplay. I have moved two sentences from the plot to a new section for gameplay, but there is much more that can be written, especially considering this game's varied styles of mini-games.

To help with the lack of citations, I was able to provide one cited IGN review for the game. More reviews should also be included. I could not find the GameStop reviews referenced in the article; are these referring to professional reviews or merely user ratings?

A section on development could certainly be helpful; I know such sections are commonplace for a number of video game articles. Covering the info in these pages from the game's development team would be a good place to start start. --PeabodySam (talk) 00:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]