User talk:192.34.131.84

March 2015

It is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the article. You can revert it and make Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as this is becoming ever more common and known in the internet community. Do a little research and you will see that everything I had changed was FACTUAL. End of Story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.34.131.84 (talk • contribs)

If your edit added "actual facts that anyone can research and find on the internet," then you should be able to find a reliable source that supports your changes. Did you make a mistake in that edit summary? Ian.thomson (talk) 00:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "reliable source" is the "actual source" itself. The National Alliance or www.natall.com . Go check it out for yourself. It, the NA, exists. The new Chairman is William White Williams, since Erich Gliebe resigned, and it is now a membership organization, as in the "join us" link. What else makes that so difficult for you to understand? No source is more reliable than is the direct source and vs any second-hand source.

Hello, I'm Dougweller. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on National Alliance (United States), but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to National Alliance (United States), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You need to provide inline citations for your additions. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at National Alliance (United States), you may be blocked from editing. "inadvertent possession of three thumbnail photos of child pornography and falsely for seeking" - don't think so NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at National Alliance (United States). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey Asshole, Check out the links and see that what was edited was factual. This is why your articles just suck and are not up to date!

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for violating WP:3RR at National Alliance (United States) and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Article. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.