Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Carcariass (talk | contribs) at 06:28, 8 April 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

iNext LTD is Limited

DEAR Wikipedia Admins you should undelete iNext, LTD caus not only is this my First page but iNex LTS is a bramd new company "Save page" button below -Techinfosource (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7 speedy deletions will not be restored here; please see WP:Notability (organizations and companies). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Techinfosource: Not done – this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Since this is a brand new company, it is unlikely that there is yet enough independent comment about it to make an article. Wikipedia is not here to help announce "up and coming" companies. If you are connected with the company, please read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KUVC tech was having already a Article Previous To two spedy deletion

dear sir, KUVC tech got a tag Speedy deletion Two times Because of my changes , First changes makes this article as advertisment and second (now you taged this Under section 47. While this page was already on Wiki . One more thing , I tried to create one new article and second times i edited a running article both times company comes under section 47 so what is the standard and how can we check for a right article to be created on wiki -Ankit Tiwari (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Busan Brothers Bokjiwon Incident (부산 형제복지원 사건)

I, Tofoo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tofoo (talk) 08:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kate O'Brien

{{subst: }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.198.40.172 (talk • contribs)

  • @87.198.40.172:. It is unclear what you are requesting here. Kate O'Brien already exists and Draft:Kate O'Brien never existed. Your IP has never made an edit before. If an article you created or edited was deleted, but please the username of the account you edited under, the IP that made the edit if it was not logged in, or the exact article title so that we can find the article in question. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Klasjet

Hello, i wrote a page about company Klasjet, I did it for the first time , so I was using another wikipedia's page as an example and accidentally pasted this tag {{advert}} from another page. Maybe this is a reason that my page is in articles for deletion process. I want to apologise for this. -MonMic (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hekamede

My user account seems to no longer be active, although it isn't showing up in the deletion log. I'd like it back please! -86.181.49.158 (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts actually cannot be deleted – not only is there no means to do so in the MediaWiki software, but we legally need to maintain a list of all contributors to a page. Unless you have set an email address, you won't be able to change your password and admins will not be able to do so for you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@86.181.49.158: If you can't remember/retrieve the password for your old account, you are of course welcome to create a new one. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BazaarCart

Its an informative article about a small business,it does not us epromotional but factual language. pls dont delete this article -NIM562 (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NIM562: BazaarCart has not (yet) been deleted. Contest its deletion at Talk:BazaarCart. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, WikiDan, there is a deletion record for "Bazaar Cart"; it was deleted twice yesterday as a G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understand that. But there is no undeletion needed here, as the article has already been recreated. Should it survive its current deletion nomination (unlikely) it can just be moved to the proper title. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radio Nova (Newport)

I, Nick.gee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nick.gee (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nova FM

I, Nick.gee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nick.gee (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To correct any thing that needed correcting on the wiki page -Nick.gee (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Hunter.jpg

The file had a valid fair use rationale, and therefore it isn't a copyright violation. -Armbrust The Homunculus 22:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few userfy requests

Please userfy both article and talk pages. These are top 100 websites. The last one is a copyvio i'll take care of it or send page blanked. Valoem talk contrib 22:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done For the XNXX pages, there is literally nothing remotely useful in the history. The various creations were all either "I like this website" or "This is a bad website, don't visit it". I removed the page protection so you can create a new article, but there is nothing to restore.
For the Guangming Daily page, what were you hoping to gain by its restoration? As noted, it was a pure copyright violation and the source still works, so if you want to see the text just go to the source linked in the deletion notice. (A few words were changed by later editors, but it would be far better to start from scratch). Again, feel free to start a new article/draft article on the subject, but I don't see any reason to restore the old version (and a speedy deletion is not a hinderance to a fresh creation.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@ThaddeusB: To answer you question, I believe in the full history being intact when an article is restored. I also look at categories and structure to rewrite the article so no copy vio occurs which is why I also request the talk. Valoem talk contrib 04:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Valeom:, when possible we don't leave copyright violations, even in the article history. I have pasted the infobox & categories to User:Valoem/Guangming Daily (China). Neither meets the definition of creative output, so neither carries any copyright that requires attribution. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minzy

Minzy is a South Korean singer who has been active for 6 years. There is no reason for her article to be deleted. Although she has no solo work so far, her contributions to her group 2NE1 are significant. She is the main dancer of the group and one of the best dancers in her company YG Entertainment. -Shovelqueen (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minzy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Natg 19 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

minzy 2ne1

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -114.79.19.252 (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Same as the above. The title is now a redirect. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jaz zohar

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jazzohar (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC) i want to restore my deleted page named jaz zohar. because it was 100% genuine. no fake imformation was provided. Please restore my page this is my humble request to u or tell me why my page is deleted[reply]

Deborah_Valdez-Hung

Rewrite the content again and then click the "Save page" button below -202.86.143.154 (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ruscism

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -195.78.246.249 (talk) 07:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chris Hernandez

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dvins236 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dvins236: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Chris Hernandez. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/150

I would like to work on a draft I asked to be deleted because I had abandoned my work on Wikipedia for a while, and would like to work on this one in particular. Would you mind please restoring it? -Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 23:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeremy112233:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bmezhou (talk) 00:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created the page 'Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering'. The page was deleted since "20:13, 26 March 2015 Randykitty (talk | contribs) deleted page Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering (G3: Blatant hoax: cover is from "Science", link to homepage is a different journal)"

I want to undelete the page so I can correct the above mistakes.

Kyruin

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kyruin (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC) wow its about a real aspiring pro player, who is almost on a pro team in eSports they deleted it. I am not Kyruin. I am a big fan after watching him stream.[reply]

Interuniversal travel

Please userfy both talk page and page to my space, I have found some sources suggesting that multiverse theory hypothesizes this, and it is termed in science fiction. -Valoem talk contrib 04:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Valoem/Interuniversal travel. Userfied the talk page also. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Versatile Security

I, Thoren1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thoren1 (talk) 04:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still working on the article content -Thoren1 (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TDI International India (P) Limited

I, BhaskarCopywriter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BhaskarCopywriter (talk) 07:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Fixing title/link of the request Hasteur (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Syneto

I, Patkoscsaba, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patkoscsaba (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for the page are now available and I wish to update its content and resubmit it for approval-Patkoscsaba (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TechArete

I, 58.65.188.42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 58.65.188.42 (talk) 08:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable Business Case

Like to finish the work i started -Tskogstrom (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Piggywinkle (definition)

Please do not delete the informational article, "Piggywinkle". It discusses a new important word. -Writer freak (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Writer freak (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Important to whom? Among other things, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor is it a platform for writing about things you made up. This is an encyclopedia, not a personal playground. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Allumer Jewellery

I, Nleithsmith, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nleithsmith (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Activist Ageing

It seemed to have been erased and the search now redirects to the page "activity theory (aging)" which is totally unrelated to activism and ageing -MaudeG3 (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MaudeG3: Nothing was deleted. You can just go to the article history and revert the edit that made it a redirect. I just did that. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RogB Pickups

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -The Naughty Badger (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have only just put the page up, and had not had a chance to edit it further when someone deleted it. Similar pages are in existence, so I find this unannounced deletion not very fair at all. Thank you.

The Naughty Badger (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done – For a subject to have an article on Wikipedia, it must meet our inclusion criteria. In short, this means the subject must be covered in depth by reliable sources. I see no evidence that RogB Pickups has met the criteria, so restoring the article as a draft would just waste your time as it would surely be deleted later anyway. If I am mistaken and reliable source coverage exists, please reply with links to such sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand redirects

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete all the New Zealand stub type redirects. They are impossible to find now. Also undelete all the ones I don't know about but of this form -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If possible, undelete all the stub-type redirects that were deleted at around this time (November 2014) since I can't see how any of it is uncontroversial or just housekeeping. It just makes stub types impossible to use. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 DoneThese were created by moves in September 2007. Are you still trying to use these names? They are now called Template:NewZealand-stub, Template:NewZealand-bio-stub and Template:NewZealand-geo-stub. They got this way after this discussion Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2007/September#A group of redirect reversals, The conclusion here was to reverse redirects with a fairly clear statement not to delete. So I think I will restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Others include (from https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&offset=20141026143436&type=delete&user=Wizardman&page=&tagfilter= etc)
Present your case against each of these.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that these look like improper deletions. Redirects are cheap and certainly ones that have existed since 2008 (on average) should not be unilaterally deleted by an admin. One would think an admin of Wizardman's experience would know better. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Wizardman: seems to have mass deleted another set of redirects 26 October 2014 that @Nyttend: restored that Wizardman deleted again. (If I'm extrapolating from the history of {{NJ-school-stub}} correctly) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very simply, stub types should be accessible to editors, so that they can be accessed and found, same as any other redirect use. Redirects make finding that stub types exist much easier, since one would expect the standard abbreviations to be available such as "NZ" or "NJ", since stub-type template names do not follow standard grammar rules. Thus all the UAE, NJ and NZ redirects should be restored ; consider that {{US-bio-stub}} exists and {{UK-stub}} so one would expect at the very least the country of New Zealand should be available.-- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have restored all of these, excluding talk pages, and many others [1] deleted by Wizardman out of process. He was given ample time to reply here or his talk page and chose not to reply. I could have taken this to deletion review, but prefer to be BOLD and also not create unnecessary drama. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

warx2

I think this page need to be undeleted. won the best film of the year award. http://www.pbs.org/pov/blog/best-documentaries-of-2014-large-graphic.php. -Lifetough (talk) 05:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page exists and can be found at WARx2. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Metcalfep/sandbox

I, Metcalfep, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metcalfep (talk) 06:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Metcalfep: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

gurdip singh anand

my article content is different from previous one and is not copied from other website and then click the "Save page" button below -Ubskjt (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, RHaworth did error in doing a G4 (recreation) deletion as the previous AfD ended early as a G12 (copyright violation) deletion. It happens – we all make mistakes sometimes. (He could have probably speedy deleted under another criteria, but not G4). On that basis you could kindly ask him to restore or userify, or you could pursue deletion review. However, I think it would be a waste of your time as the subject does not appear to meet our inclusion criteria. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ryn Weaver

Not a vanity page. Her single Octahate has over 1 million hits on YouTube, performed on Late Show w David Letterman, multiple interviews with international publications, performing at SXSW, Coachella, Bonaroo 2015. written for Gwen Stefani and collaborated with Cashmere Cat, Passion Pit, Benny Blanco. Provides soundtrack for current MTV Real World season -2602:306:36EB:96F0:217:F2FF:FE4D:B5E6 (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryn Weaver, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MelanieN (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2010–2011 Foolad F.C. season

Article was prodded, however articles for every other season remain. Should have been improved not deleted. Nfitz (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC) -Nfitz (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Davewild (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antal Szabo, Impressionist Painter

I, Cjhmacacct, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cjhmacacct (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Davewild (talk) 07:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Karn

I, Reviewer Editor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reviewer Editor (talk) 05:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Davewild (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jujiro-matsuda.jpg

not my image. Photo of a long-dead Japanese captain of industry, I can make a case for the file's rationale. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and fixed!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coeleen Kiebert

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jackie K. Cooper

I, Scarnold1962, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scarnold1962 (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cappadocia Ultra Trail

I, 81.57.40.138, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.57.40.138 (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Inventioning (band)

I, CStack3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CStack3 19:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I was working on the needed documentation to strengthen "Inventioning(band)" but the page was deleted by the time I could open the link.

I would like to meet the objections of the prior editor and continue work on "Inventiong (band)" if allowed.

Please note, I am a disabled Wikipedia contributor and donor to Wikipedia. Sometimes it takes me longer to finish a project than I would like, but I know your needs for quality and third-party documentation.

Thank you,

Charles R. Stack, MPH

"CStack3" on Wikipedia

IMbesharam.com

I, 50.153.130.27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.153.130.27 (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: I can't find any trace of a deleted page with this title, in the main space or in the Draft or AfC spaces. Please give the exact title of the page you mean (capitalisation is significant), or the username of the account that created it. JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It surely is – I thought I looked there? Anyway, Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:IMBesharam. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Craig Soley

I, Samwates, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samwates (talk) 03:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Samwates: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 11:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOTH25.png

This file was deleted under F4 (no source). However, I'm pretty sure I remember indicating its source as either [2] or [3]. And besides, as a simple combination of a circle, two numerals, and three plain words against a solid background, this image is definitely ineligible for copyright protection in the U.S. -Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jennifer Cheng

I, Glamitco1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Glamitco1 (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note this submission will be rejected for promotion unless you tone down the advertising and hype. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of Shekhar Chatterjee

We have many more resources that prove the notability of the article. As per AFD, the article was considered non-notable only because the article was published in City Section of Times of India and not National Section. But now I have many resources that relate the article the article to national news coverages and hence decide it's notability. -182.237.12.10 (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhar Chatterjee, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jagan Ramamoorthy

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Talentagent2015 (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am a talent agent for this world class artist and I have many more things to add about his career that began at the age of seven and continues to be one of a legacy torchbearer in his unique style of playing the violin and carrying forth his mentor's lineage in the western world, after having done a terrific work in the east as well. There are many more important things and external links etc to be added. So, kindly review this request and allow for retention of this page. The person in this article is unique and has a wide range of creative successes and repertoire related material that millions of others can be easily inspired by.

Thank you.

Tammie D.

Talent Agent.

Not done First of all, if you are the subject's talent agent you shouldn't be writing an article about him. See WP:COI. Second, the article was deleting under G11 – unambiguous promotion. This is not a judgement on the importance of the subject, but rather a judgement on the quality of the writing. This is what tends to happen when people with a conflict of interest write an article – they are unable to be neutral (which is required of all Wikipedia articles) and the article is deleted on those grounds.
If you insist on trying again, please do so by using the article for creation process so that the article can be review for neutrality before it hits mainspace. If the article remains non-neutral, it will be declined with advice on how to fix it instead of being deleted outright. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jon Stokes

I, 86.181.168.89, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.181.168.89 (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

We are still working on rectifying this article so would be most grateful if you could keep it open for us.

Kind regards,

Sophie

@86.181.168.89: The article was restored back in August with a promise to work on it. Not a single edit was made after that. I can restore it again, but I need some assurance that you will actually work on it this time – Article for creation is not an indefinite holding space for articles that no one is working on. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:European Cloud Partnership

I, Shroomer69, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shroomer69 (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fever Hut

I, 176.12.107.140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 176.12.107.140 (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? Reviewers: The blue link is essentially this request posted on the draft's page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coinsecure

Droidmaxxx (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming exchange in India by one of key Bitcoin community member Benson Samuel, Also Moderator of Bitcointalk.org Indian sub-forum and Investor Mohit Kalra Son of well Know Business industrialist in Delhi -Droidmaxxx (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This also looks like it was deleted per WP:G11, as the content was extremely promotional in tone. When writing articles, avoid WP:PEACOCK terms and writing things like "we" and "our". Wikipedia is not like WP:NOTLINKEDIN and other websites where you can create listings that you control. Wikipedia articles must be neutrally written and show notability by way of multiple independent and reliable sources. This article is a good start, but you would need more to show notability since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by being associated with notable persons, companies, or subjects. I would personally recommend that you create a draft article at WP:AfC and work on a new article from scratch, since it's extremely unlikely that any of the content will be restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep. I would add that if an editor can't recognize that content and especially tone were promotional and unencyclopedic they should probably gain more experience in reading and writing. Drmies (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edith von Welser-Ude

I suggest that this page be undeleted because:

The article is about a German public figure, a photographer and the "first lady" of Munich for over a decade when Christian Ude was the mayor. You can find more information here (in German): http://welser-ude-foto.de/aktuelles.htm http://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/edith-von-welser-ude-liebling-der-genossen-1.1580301 http://www.galerie-der-kulturen.de/html/kuenstler_welser-ude.html http://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/edith-von-welser-ude-wird-wir-sind-oberbuergermeister-1.363825 http://www.muenchen.tv/mediathek/tag/edith-von-welser-ude/ http://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/main/zpd/English/Gallery/foreigners/T197671.shtml

Yes, the article could use more details, and I will add some. --Piotr (Venezuela) (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Piotr (Venezuela): I'd probably recommend that you work on a copy in your userspace at User:Piotr (Venezuela)/Edith von Welser-Ude before adding anything to the mainspace, mostly because sometimes it can take a while to really flesh out and source an article. Also, while Peridon is somewhat easygoing with article restorations, the article consisted of the lines "Edith von Welser-Ude is a German socialite. She has been married to former Mayor of Munich Christian Ude since 1984." It's not really enough to really restore. Finally, I will warn you that being married to a notable person does not always mean that this notability is inherited- it's quite common for spouses of mayors (and many notable persons) to fail notability criteria. What you need to show in the article are sources that specifically focus on her as opposed to just mentioning her briefly in relation to her husband. Some mention of her husband is expected and sources like this are good, but you need for there to be a lot of sources that really go beyond her status as "wife of mayor". Also be very careful about guest spots on shows and the like since sometimes those are not the type that would give notability, as seems to somewhat be the case with this link, which appears to be a recipe. What you need are appearances where they really go into depth about her work as a whole. Showings in galleries are good since those can raise the chances of her gaining coverage, but having a show doesn't necessarily give notability unless she was part of an exhibit in a notable museum and/or part of their permanent collection. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Niquenya D. Fulbright

I, 73.209.3.104, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.209.3.104 (talk) 06:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I will say that you will likely need to be a little careful with editing the tone, since it does come across slightly like a press release at times. Nothing so major that I wouldn't restore it, but it does somewhat veer off into "official bio" territory. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jayy Von Monroe

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Deidaramonroe (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/toothpick.com

I, Sicsdrewad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sicsdrewad (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page can now be foudn at Draft:Toothpick.com. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forte Village Resort

Can you please userfy this page? I'd like to restart the page in a way that it is not seen as promotional. -Estimator Unilateral Made (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – the page can now be found at Draft:Forte Village Resort. Please use the "submit" button on the template I added to the page when you think it is ready. That way it won't be deleted again if it is still promotional. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Spotts

Public figure who is still active and is linked from several other Wikipedia articles. Sources can be provided. -CorySpotts (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the sources from this page, as they are ultimately irrelevant (they remain in history). Note that just being linked to from other Wikipedia articles is not a reason to have a Wikipedia page on him. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if the article is actually on the same subject as described in the request but... Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NWF Tri-State Championship

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Axe2x (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that A11 deletions cannot be contested here, and even if they could, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Wrestling Federation (2nd nomination) seems to preclude this request anyways, as pages deleted after a deletion debate cannot be restored here, and the consensus was that the championship pages were likewise to be deleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I think A11's could be challenged here if they were incorrect, but the first approach should be to the deleting admin. In this case A11 would not be applicable as the competition's existence is confirmed by independent references I found. But thanks to the AFD that said the organisation cannot have an article here, it could apply to its matches too. Si I will just leave it deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sonu Ratra

I, Ez1989, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ez1989 (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, nothing to do. The draft isn't deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Acting Witan of Mercia

Can you please open this article again for editing and then resubmission? Thanks Snoobysoo (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Selig

I, 76.104.195.235, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.104.195.235 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Westside Test Anxiety Scale

I, DrD001, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DrD001 (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know why article was deleted,

It was deleted because it had lain fallow (i.e. there had been no non-automated edits done to it) for six months. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done I've restored it and moved it to Draft:Westside Test Anxiety Scale, the correct location for AfC drafts. DrD001, please leave this article in the draftspace. It's a lot easier to track the articles this way and it's confusing to move them around too much- especially since moving them around can sometimes end up with them getting placed in the wrong location, which is what happened here. (You placed this on a userpage, by which I mean that you made it seem as if there was a user by the name of "Westside Test Anxiety Scale".) I'm a little surprised that the declining editor didn't notice that the other draftcopy was just a redirect to the copy they declined, but that's kind of why Wikipedia tends to prefer that AfC articles remain in one easily identifiable location. In any case, the article is now back in the draftspace and you can work on it. One thing I can recommend is that you will need to use in-line citations, preferably ones that we can link to and verify in some form or fashion. Google Scholar and Google Books can sometimes offer previews, so that tends to be a good place to start. A lot of academic outlets and databases like JSTOR have preview pages, which can also be used to verify the content if another editor has access to an institution that offers database access. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autonomous sensory meridian response

please restore full history of both page and talk, article is notable -Valoem talk contrib 02:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • As long as Hut 8.5 is cool with it, I'll restore it. The page looks like it passes GNG quite easily now, but the deleted stuff had gone through AfD so I'm not sure if this would still require his input or not. I figure that I'll go with protocol first with this. I don't see anything that would really be an issue to restore. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tokyogirl79: , @Hut 8.5: I mean this history here Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response. Valoem talk contrib 23:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alistair A. Vogan

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kingsley Kuchner (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I would like to have the article I submitted, which was initially rejected for formatting reasons, to be undeleted so that I might make the required corrections. Unfortunately, the submission remained dormant for more than six months due to circumstances beyond my control.

Thank you for understanding.

Kind regards,

Kingsley Kuchner 

To start a page called Draft:Alistair A. Vogan, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then save it.

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 

   21:23, 31 March 2015 JohnCD (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Alistair A. Vogan

The page required corrections to formatting but was left dormant for a six month period. I would like to have it undeleted so that the required changes can be made for resubmission.} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsley Kuchner (talk • contribs) 08:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • On a side note, IMDb is not usable as a reliable source because it is ultimately a routine database listing and merchant sources like Amazon should not be on Wikipedia at all. Not only is their primary reason for existence to sell something to you, but by linking to it this can come across as Wikipedia personally endorsing the site and/or product. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BFKL

I, Ieet2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ieet2 (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protrader

It doesn't an advertising information and its proven by valuably links. The content of the article was improved according to all wikipedia requires. -VasyaLukyanenko (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@VasyaLukyanenko: The page was not deleted as "advertising", but rather for lack of "notability". I have restored the page, but moved it to draft space. It can now be found at Draft:Protrader. The AfD was way back in 2011, so there is a decent chance notability has been established since then. However, you need additional reliable sources to establish notability, and the article be a summary of what those sources say. Here is a news search to point you in the right direction... Please use the articles for creation process but hitting the "submit" button at the top of the draft article when you think it is ready. This way it will be reviewed by an experienced editor and advice given if improvements are needed instead of the article just being deleted on sight again. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mars Initiative

Mars Initiative is unique and not associated with colonization. It is to develop a prize for the first landing, regardless of whether the landing party stays or visits. It is distinct and separate from colonization efforts. If you Google Mars Initiative, it is mentioned in many places on the web and is a real organization -173.172.30.74 (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

coming home (in the fairest of the seasons)

this page contains information about a new Feature Film project.Mod144 19:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC) and then click the "Save page" button below -Mod144 19:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. The article isn't deleted (yet), but when it is, you need to discuss it with the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Becker

dont delete he is a college player for stonehill college and a highly reguarded player in the draft. -Hcostello17 (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Just Chilling (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brajendra Navnit

I, Amnendranavnit, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amnendranavnit (talk) 03:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)182.65.38.230 (talk) 03:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons in the Field

Because this band is just as important as Focal Point, like Focal Point, this was the starting band for Daniel Weydant, who is now somewhat famous, (In music, that is). -Metalworker14 (Yo) 13:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

@Metalworker14: The band doesn't appear to meet our inclusion criteria. However, I have redirected the article to Wydant's page, where the subject is covered. Feel free to expand the information contained there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Music Learning Theory

This deletion is improper, because the criteria for speedy deletion were not valid. The admin deleted it for reasons of copyright and promotional tone. I can only argue, as a domain expert, that the article was not infringing, and that it was not promotional. Gordon Music Learning Theory is a widely-known and cited body of music education research. The Gordon Music Learning Theory page should be restored. We can add additional citations to demonstrate that this page is valid. -Lxdrsk (talk) 13:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have restored an earlier version of the page prior to the addition of copyrighted material. As a reminder to JamesBWatson who deleted the page: always make sure to check a page history before deleting – sometimes copyrighted material or other problems are only present in recent versions of the page, not the entire history. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shahzad K. Chaudhry

Dear Users i did not understand about this deletion and i am still working on i can quote you all the reference and we all comunity should want to know why we can not put our stars and our leaders in wekipedia -Describeme4u (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Describeme4u - The page was deleted because there was no indication of how Chaudhry meets our inclusion criteria. In short, we only have articles on subjects which have been covered by multiple reliable sources in detail. In part, this is for a subject's own protection – if we allowed anyone to write about any subject we would have no way to know if something written was a lie or not. In other words, malicious people could make up lies about people they don't like and publish it here for the world to see... If you look over the inclusion criteria and think Chaudhry meets them, I can restore the article to draft space for you. However, If he doesn't meet the criteria it would be a waste of your time. --ThaddeusB (talk)

ThaddeusB each and everything can be provided by the proof and references and not only by one user please restore the page and give us time to proof you everything

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Describeme4u (talk • contribs) 07:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BFKL

I, Ieet2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ieet2 (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. As the page is still live, you can make an edit to it to cancel the G13 speedy. Please note that the draft space is not for indefinitely hosting material unsuitable for an encyclopedia. This request has already been serviced above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Philippines Los Baños Institute of Biological Sciences

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Abdupo (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. G11 speedy deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done promotional text has already been removed. There is nothing to undelete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

umer romio

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Umerromio (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7 deletions are not overturned here; when the page is deleted you will need to talk to the deleting administrator. However, I would suggest finding a blog to do this on. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's deleted now. Wikipedia is not the place for you to post your original poetry. See WP:NOTHOST and WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done It also looks like this account is a sockpuppet of User:Shafiqzafar217, so I've blocked them for this. The other user posted his resume and other content using the page as a LinkedIN page, so I've blocked him for self-promotion. If he can show that he understands policy and will not do this again he can probably be unblocked, but the Umerromio account is too much of a WP:DUCK not to block. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dixon's Violin

I, 50.156.11.231, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.156.11.231 (talk) 23:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I also moved it to Draft:Dixon's Violin, per AFC guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

REDCODE

Hello. REDCODE is the (proprietary) file format used by all models of one of the top-three, cinema-grade, digital motion picture camera manufacturers, the RED Digital Cinema Camera. The article describes the file format and, as far as I now, it is the only web page on the Internet trying to address that; that is a reason why it may be target of wikilinks. Take a look at the manufacturer's page to see how many movies and TV Series have been shot with RED cameras: http://www.red.com/shot-on-red Since this is a proprietary file format, yet it has very original metadata scheme, there are no sites describing it while this should be present in any technology-drive encyclopedia. As a matter of fact, I created or edited several articles describing other file formats, and they are all successful. I have also been thinking of adding more articles on other raw camera file formats' internals but, since I have too a full-time job in the business, I can never find the time. I apologize for not replying earlier (than [REDCODE]'s deletiaon), but this is understandably my main justification: lack of professional time. Thanks for your precious time reading. -Walter.Arrighetti (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Walter.Arrighetti:, I don't have a huge issue with restoring it but I am somewhat concerned with the statement "there are no sites describing it while this should be present in any technology-drive encyclopedia". The issue with this statement is that you're essentially saying that this does not have any coverage in reliable sources, or at least this is how I am interpreting this statement. Regardless of how often something is used, if the coverage does not exist to show that the topic (in this case a file format) passes notability guidelines then it really can't be on Wikipedia. Even if you or I think that something should be in Wikipedia, if it doesn't pass notability guidelines then we really can't include it until the coverage surfaces or until guidelines are changed to allow for it to be included. On first glance many of the sources in the article appear to be WP:PRIMARY, meaning that they cannot show notability and can only be used to back up basic information. I'd be a little more comfortable with this going to your userspace and you working on it until the coverage becomes available if you'd be OK with that, since if I restore it to mainspace it'd be very likely that Be..anyone could/would nominate it for AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, the problem with too many spammy links to REDCODE and Red Digital Cinema Camera Company is solved for now from my POV. :-) –Be..anyone (talk) 04:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barts1a

I would like to have my userpage restored. Thanks. -Barts1a / Talk to me / Help me improve 03:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karl Nerenberg

I, Chrisking1977, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chrisking1977 (talk) 03:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crimson Alberta Ferretti dress of Uma Thurman

This AfD here has set a precedence, these dresses are notable. A cursory search of the subject brought these sources [4] and [5] suggesting some notability. Please userfy both page and talk page. -Valoem talk contrib 04:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tokyogirl79: I am not going to just restore it I never do that, I am asking for the material to be userfied so I can see what I am working with. Valoem talk contrib 05:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Nerenberg

I didn't have time to edit it before it was deleted. A little sidetracked. -Chrisking1977 (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gen. Gharzai Khwakhuzhi.jpg

Permission received via. OTRS Ticket:2014111710018001. Please ping me when replying -Mdann52 (talk) 14:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdann52:  Done already by Rjd0060. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverly Hills Sports Council

I, 71.108.185.205, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.108.185.205 (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a reasonable question to ask, Jeremy. To say how they're planning to develop the draft, the IP user would have to be able to view the draft, which they very obviously are not at the moment. Without that, all they can say is some generic stuff like "add info and refs" that would be as unhelpful as your above note. An editor expressed their interest in working on an abandoned draft so let's restore the draft and see what happens, it's not like we have anything to lose. 181.167.52.241 (talk) 13:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but that is the standard question that all users seeking to get a draft that has twice been deleted as abandoned are asked, even by the administrators that service these requests. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A "generic" promise to add sources would be sufficient to restore. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Play With This Too

The page was deleted as "Unambiguous advertising or promotion", which is was not. It was an article I wrote about a toy company which has been covered numerous times in various media on the topic and had numerous notable sources. No one involved with the company wrote the page. It should be undeleted. -Mathewignash (talk) 02:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. From unsubstantiated statements about "high end" products, to a laundry list of interviews the head of the company has given in non-notable outlets, to over-detailed information about Kickstarter promotions and product lines, the article looked like pure advertising. If you disagree, take it up with the deleting administrator, Deb. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mathewignash: The subject appears to meet our inclusion criteria, so feel free to start a new article that sticks to a summary of what third-party reliable sources say. See WP:Your first article for straightforward advice to writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo Oktavianus Sitanggang

Article about a footballer who has since made his professional debut see here, thus passing notability guidelines. I would also ask that Paulo Sitanggang be re-created for similar reasons as they are the same person. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare in Washington (state)

Can I please have a userfied copy of this article? Thanks. - Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done The page can now be found at User:Bluerasberry/Healthcare in Washington (state). --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Raben Group

There was a credible claim of importance (even more so in earlier iterations of the article) so A7 didn't apply. Clearly deleted in error by an admin who didn't bother to look at the talk page and learn the full story. -181.167.52.241 (talk) 12:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done It would have been better to contact the deleting admin, but I'm confident he would restore it after seeing the article history and talk page, so I went ahead and did it for you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wnt-tooth.png

From the source of the image, I found that the authors could use the CC-BY (Attribution 3.0) license if the article that I received this image from is open access (which it is), but the administrator said that was incorrect, which is why it was originally deleted -Manpriya.A (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Exchange

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Baijukc (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no copyright violation on the contents added as the same is reproduced from the Corporate Website of the Exchange 1. www.easternexchange.com.qa 2. www.easternexchangeqatar.com

The exchange house is one among the oldest exchange house established in the State of Qatar (1979) and hence it is appropriate to include the name and brief description about the exchange house in Wikipedia for the benefit of the Citizens and Expatriates from the State of Qatar.

Please restore the page.

Not done - Whether the text was copied from an official webpage or a third party source, it is still a copyright violation. See my reply on my talk page for more information. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congleton Lawn Tennis Club

Andrew Giltrap (talk) 17:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: no text provided by user. --Finngall talk 17:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See also Andrew Giltrap's talk page. Huon (talk) 18:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas E. Alahverdian

This page was deleted without meeting G4 criteria. It does not contain "substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate" and changes in the content "address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted," In regards to notability, If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. (from WP:NOTABILITY). In practice, sustained news coverage of an individual pretty much guarantees notability. There are tons of sources, over 30 from major news orgs. The content is significantly different from what was deleted at AFD, making it ineligible for G4. Stuff has happened since it was deleted in April 2014 and obviously couldnt be included in that article because it was in the future. Sources about the subject are from The Boston Globe, The Providence Journal, Associated Press, Brown University student newspaper, The New Haven Register, NBC news, CBS news affiliates, Politifact, ProPublica, the Omaha world herald, WPRO, WPRI, WJAR and others. Appears to meet GNG since the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and it is "suitable for a stand-alone article" (see WP:Notability). Perhaps a solution would be to reverse the delete and let the community decide. EricJ1074 (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It looks to me like the sources are primarily from pre-2013, which are largely what the previuosly-deleted version were relying on. It has an appearance of extensive sourcing, but most of the sources are repeated several times. As such, I don't see that it addresses the concerns in both AFDs, the first being Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian, therefore G4 may still apply. I suggest you talk to the deleting administrator Anthony Bradbury and ask him to reconsider deletion, or at least restore it to Draft space for further improvement. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Structural-Safety

I, Gordon Masterton, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Further information and external sources is available to independently validate the significance of the organisation. I would like to update the draft in preparation for a re-submission. -Gordon Masterton (talk) 22:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 02:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

E Studios

I would like to improve the wrongs of this page and bring it up to the guidelines of Wikipedia. -Estudios17 (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First off, your name should not represent your company, but is supposed to be that of a person. Secondly you should not write about your own company see WP:COI. Do you have any independent references to get started on this topic? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ithaca College Police Department

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jdec46 (talk) 02:53, 5 April 2015 (UTC) I figure since I create a website about those police department they should say up![reply]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jdec46 (talk) 02:55, 5 April 2015 (UTC) This is a free website to be able to create a page like I did since I am the original create of both Cornell university police and Ithaca college police![reply]

Shaquille McDonald

Please restore this article's history prior to it being deleted at AfD, as the subject now passes WP:NFOOTBALL Thanks -JMHamo (talk) 12:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AHMED TAOUFIKI

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -DESTINYBOB (talk) 15:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DESTINYBOB. It may be possible for a reliably sourced article to be written demonstrating that Taoufiki is notable and having verifiable content, though a quick look did not reveal many sources to me. Reliable, secondary sources that are independent of him in French would be acceptable (I found this but little else, and that appears to be a "mere mention" of him, rather than substantive content talking about him in detail). In any event, any article would have to be written from a neutral point of view, and the content you posted read like you were involved with this subject, with a stake in using Wikipedia as an advertizing platform to promote him. I deleted the article mostly on that basis, as "blatant advertizing" under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. This does not mean you could not re-post a proper and neutrally-written article, but I suspect that is not possible at this point in his career. By the way, this page is for seeking undeletion of content already deleted. The page was not deleted when you posted here, and actually drew my attention to it. Of course it is deleted now (and I stand by that deletion). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yorkshire Water Authority (Southern) F.C.

Added a quick deletion tag to this article by mistake! -Kivo (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Way Out (film)

I, Mike uchitel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike uchitel (talk) 23:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike uchitel: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Way Out (film)

I have additional proves that the film is of artistic value: articles in German newspapers: http://juedischerundschau.de/ausweg-aus-einer-ausweglosen-lage/ http://evrejskaja-panorama.de/v-poiskah-vyhoda-iz-bezvyhodnogo-polozhenija/ and the film was accepted by the Cannes film festival Der Autritt/The Way Out/Выход at Cannes Festival -Mike uchitel (talk) 23:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike uchitel: You have not created any pages at Wikipedia that have been deleted. Indeed, your only contributions are to this forum. The page cited above is a redirect created in 2014.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NWF Tag Team Championship

Because I Said So And It's Should Not Be Deleted In the First Place "Save page" button below -Xsefgx5 (talk) 01:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Wrestling Federation

It's A Company That's Semi-Famous And Notable "Save page" button below -Xsefgx5 (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Xsefgx5: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Wrestling Federation (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cascadia Composers

I wish to edit the article -Musicwriter 2014 (talk) 02:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Hello Musicwriter. This page cannot be undeleted as it blatantly infringed on the copyright of those owning the content at this page. Unless you wrote that material at that external site, it was also plagiarism as it presented it as if your own writing. If you are the owner of the text, we could only use it if you or someone else with ownership over the copyright released it to the world under a compatible free copyright license (or into the public domain and did that release in a verifiable way); we could not use it simply with permission for use here. Although some of this material was not suitable in the first place to be in an encyclopedia article, if applicable, some of the the methods for providing a copyright release/freely-licensing are given at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Please don't copy and paste previously published material again. Thank you--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Musicwriter 2014 (talk) 04:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fuhghettaboutit,

I don't know if this is where I respond to your comments. I am the author of the page you mentioned above. I am a member of Cascadia Composers, and I am the chairperson of the Historian committee; I have one other person on that committee. The board of Cascadia asked me to compile our history and post it onto our website and in Wikipedia. The said committee of myself and one other person compiled the information in the article after interviewing all the people mentioned in the article and I wrote the article and submitted the article to Wikipedia. I have not infringed on any copyright laws or plagerized any material. I also gave permission for the article to be printed on the Cascadia Composer website.

Please tell me how to proceed. Cascadia Composer would sincerely like to have this article, which is the history of our organization, on Wilkipedia. After my initial submission, the article was returned to me for editing; I edited it immediately, resubmitted it, and awaited the outcome. In January, 2015 I received notification that "6 months have elapsed and because I had not edited the article, it would be deleted." I had, in fact, edited and submitted the article with the changes recommended afte rmy first draft.

I had virtually given up on this project; however the Cascadia Composers board wanted me to pursue it again to try to get the article on Wikipedia.

I have no expertise in technical writing, but I followed all instructions very closely. I repeat: I have not plagiarized this article. I am the author of the article. In my frustration with trying to follow the technical aspects of proceeding with this project, I asked a Cascadia Composers board member to help. I sent him the article in its entirety, and he is to try to proceed with the project.

Please tell me how to proceed.

Musicwriter 2014

Hi again Musicwriter. You can't retain non-free copyright (i.e., state "© 2015 Cascadia Composers" at the external site; a claim of non-free copyright ownership) but also post that same content here, because we require additions here to be irrevocably freely-licensed to the world for reuse under our free licenses. To fix this, make a change at the external site. Replace that copyright notice at the bottom with the following:
The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).
If you do that then there's no problem with undeleting the article (drop a note here saying it's done). Alternatively, you can:
  1. Send an email from the domain name of the website (thus presenting a form of verification that the email is from a person with authority over the source of the content) –
  2. To permissions-en@wikimedia.org, containing a copyright release following the form at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries;
  3. After sending the email, create Draft talk:Cascadia Composers with this content: {{OTRS pending}} and I'd also recommend referencing this discussion there.
An OTRS volunteer will then reply to your email, indicating whether the content and the license is acceptable and should either undelete the page, or if they are not an administrator, will ask one to undelete it (they sometimes make such requests here).
Obviously this alternative option is more involved and less within your control. Of course, that will only take care of the copyright issue allowing undeletion without a problem, but it does not mean the article will be accepted. I can and am willing to help trying to make the article more acceptable for publication once undeleted. That issue always resolves ultimately on whether there are sufficient reliable, secondary sources, entirely independent of the topic, that have written about it substantively (such as books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals and websites that meet the same requirements as reputable print-based sources), thus demonstrating notability and allowing a verifiable article to be written. If those source don't exist then it's all for naught. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Musicwriter 2014: You may want to just re-write the article somewhat anyway, since it does have some sections that come across as slightly promotional. That's kind of the difficulty with taking material "as is" from another website. In most cases the material in question was written to promote its topic (in this case Cascadia Composers) so it will contain WP:PEACOCK terms and buzzwords that are meant to portray the topic in a flattering light. This isn't as bad as some of the others but it does have some phrases like "grown rapidly" and the last paragraph in the article would have to be removed entirely since it contains sentences like "diverse group of women composers that span several generations and honors their differences in compositional style and philosophies". While it doesn't immediately seem like it, it's actually somewhat easier to just re-write things than to file a ticket since it's easier to re-write and get rid of the promotional tones than it is to try to pick out the various terms without chopping up the sentences too much. I also have to say that articles that have content taken "as is" from other places are under almost continual scrutiny from other editors and in the end are almost always re-written. I remember one case (can't remember the article's name) where there was an article about an artist whose management team gave us permission to use content from their website. The content was very neutrally written and I got the impression that they'd always intended it to be placed on Wikipedia, but the content was always under scrutiny and the page was always being accused of being promotional because it had material taken from another website. Eventually a few of us just went through and did a massive re-write because we were tired of the page getting tagged and having to continually explain that it wasn't promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I agree, and should have mentioned that there is no impediment to you creating the draft again right now, so long as you don't use this copyrighted material. What you should be doing is gathering together reliable sources you can use, like this, and using what they say to guide your writing hand (in your own words), while citing such sources. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lazy Dog Adventures

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -CricketDesmarais (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy Dog Adventures

I am sorry I haven't had a chance to make the proper edits to this page. We have experienced death, a relocation & subsequent stresses in my family & this has taken a way back seat to which I am now ready to take care of. Please allow me the opportunity to make the corrections & formatting/citations necessary. I appreciate your understanding.

Best, Cricket Desmarais

@Cricket Desmarais: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Lazy Dog Adventures. This has already been restored once and left untouched: please edit it to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black River Films, LLC

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Michiganman1979 (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Michiganman1979:  Not done - there is nothing worth restoring: the article as you created it said only "Here is our logo" with a link to a non-existent file, and then you blanked it. If you want to create an article, go ahead, but read WP:Your first article first, to understand what a Wikipedia article needs. I suggest that you use the WP:Article wizard to guide you through the process. That will give you the option to send a draft for review at WP:Articles for creation. You should probably do that anyway, since your use of "our" suggests that you are connected with the company, so you should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Young Drivers of Canada

I, TeeMarek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TeeMarek (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page was to be modified by another user which did not occur. I would like to correct it and publish it. I apologize for the confusion and lack of response. Regards, Tee Marek and then click the "Save page" button below -TeeMarek (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TeeMarek: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. What is needed is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discourse of Power

Please userify this to User:Achatani/sandbox (the original location). Was a student draft for a course this term. Thanks. -Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam (Wiki Ed):  Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Association Internationale de la Presse Sportive

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because that's very formal approach from the User:Jbhunley. There is only one sentence was copied from the AIPS web http://www.aipsmedia.com/images/STAT_ENG.pdf

And this copy is important to clear explanation of the AIPS Goals. And that's all! Thq Rule G12 is no so important here, but more important exact explanation of AIPS Goals.

So you are needn't to speed with the "speed deleting", dear Jbhunley (and next so formal Davewild)! And I didn't finished improvements of the Article. It needs in more citation, more links.

You could help us (me and International Journalists Commutity) to improve the Article, for example, in Criteria correction etc.

And you can help to improve it too. There is very easy to delete everything, but it's no easy to improve importance.Vlmvv (talk) 22:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC) -Vlmvv (talk) 22:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. We absolutely cannot accept copy-pasted material, even if it is just one sentence. NOTE TO ADMINS: The blue link is essentially a protest against the page's prior deletion and should not prejudice this or future requests. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Hey Vlmvv. You're correct that the copied and pasted content that was in the Membership and Goals section was only one sentence – except that it was taken wholesale from a list of ten separate points that were combined into one sentence and was 197 words long. It's great that you had cited that passage to its source, and many people are simply unaware of the requirements to comply with copyright and avoid plagiarism. For future reference, you can use quotations under an implicit claim of fair use, so long as the quote is relatively short, but you must place that content in quotation marks to avoid plagiarism. The problem here is that even if we undeleted and placed quotes around it, it would be too long to sustain fair use and could not remain. Moreover, as far as I can tell, all of the remaining content of the article was also copied and pasted, from here so it really was a copyright violation from stem to stern and so it cannot be undeleted. There is nothing stopping you from re-posting an article on this topic, but this time writing it in your own words. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fuhghettaboutit! Thank you for the wide explanation of the Wiki underwater cobblestones. But I am scientist and my affiliation is only with God, may be, or Truth.... In so way what is the idea of plagiarism? See more carefully the Goals of Wiki! And you never would talk about so terrible thing!.. With me, anyway.... I have cited the Article correctly and my mistake was only in the forgotten quotes marking of the one sentence from the Net. And I think that's impossible to delete so quickly the results of the work instead of try to improve simple mistake! Don't you think so, do you?Vlmvv (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Vlmvv. I do not. As I said, it wasn't just the "one sentence" (which was actually ten separate points in the original that were combined by you into one sentence with semi-colons) but the rest of the content. AFAICT all of it was also copied from another source, from here, as I stated above. So, it does not appear that you wrote anything yourself but rather copied and pasted the entire article from copyrighted, previously written material and presented that as your own work. This is basically the definition of plagiarism, and is blatant copyright infringement. The fact that you did not understand you were doing anything wrong, did not have bad intent, is a good thing but does nothing to help the cause of undeletion. That is not going to happen. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fuhghettaboutit, thanks for the link, I see it firstly and will use in future [6]. SincerelyVlmvv (talk) 13:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vlmvv: I understand English is not your first language, so I hope we we are not misunderstanding one another. Your response above seems to indicate something you may not have intended. Let me just go back to some basics, and if you understand this already, no harm done.
  • Any content you copy and paste from anywhere must not only be cited (as you've been doing), but be placed in quotation marks ("...") to show it is someone else's writing.
  • You can only use a relatively short-in-length quotation from any particular source to meet the fair use exception to copyright protection.
  • Even if you only use short quotations from disparate sources, an article cannot be made up of mostly quotations of copyrighted sources.
  • What you should be doing is writing the article in your own words. The sources you cite indicate the information may be verified by that source, but not the exact words used (and be aware that minor surface modification is insufficient to avoid a copyright problem).
  • If you write in your own words, and cite reliable sources, but your English is not so good, the prose can be fixed by others.
Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DuOS-M

I, 63.147.10.3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 63.147.10.3 (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. While a G13 can normally be restored, G11s will not be restored here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Absalom Drake.jpg

OTRS permission. Need to check before if it's not a photograph subject. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 22:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa can you take a look on this?Willy Weazley 03:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understand the question. The image is an old photograph of William Absalom Drake, taken professionally I would guess. It looks like this. Do you want it undeleted? -- Diannaa (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you. Don't need to undelete. I will ask for more information from the sender.Willy Weazley 03:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Let me know if and when you wish to proceed with undeletion. -- Diannaa (talk) 03:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viva Starr 1.jpg

Please undelete and insert {{OTRSreceived|id=2015030810001371}} and {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 22:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Diannaa (talk) 03:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mateens7007/First International Islamic Unity Conference

I, Mateens7007, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mateens7007 (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Its War Image.jpg

Please undelete and insert {{OTRS permission|id=2015032210007963}}. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 23:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, the OTRS record looks OK, although the "sent to me personally" source line doesn't quite jibe with the OTRS communication. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Father Bentley

I, 98.116.53.122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.116.53.122 (talk) 01:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shigemi Inagaki

I, Kaarutomuson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kaarutomuson (talk) 03:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjit_Kumar_Das

{{subst:refund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjit_Kumar_Das as by mistake i have deleted}}

Draft:Tilly with Spiky Hands

I, Cspoon97, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cspoon97 (talk) 07:57, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:I-genius

I, 92.17.108.187, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.17.108.187 (talk) 11:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was awaiting confirmation of my resubmission after the initial edit. -92.17.108.187 (talk) 11:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Besides reading like a commercial and thus properly being deleted as blatant advertising, this was a also a blatant copyright violation of this and this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
However, you should feel free to start a new draft using your own words instead of content copied from other places. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:I-genius

I, Barryatigenius, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. barrygeniusc (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Hi Barry. See the thread directly above this one.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Young Democrats of Frederick County

I, starjlw, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanks! starjlw

Voxxed

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Loxxed (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please can I ask what more data I can include to indicate that it is worthwhile having a Voxxed page?

I think this article may have been unfairly taken down.

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tristan Lauber

I, Olgaboca, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Olgaboca (talk) 17:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Olgaboca: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LIving Spaces

I don't believe my page should have been deleted, it was highly referenced and was similar to other companies that have approved pages. -Rae4sunshine (talk) 18:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Rae4sunshine: To clarify, the problem with the article wasn't the number of references, but rather the tone of the article. that is, it was written in such a way that it appeared to promote the company rather than being a neutral, encyclopedic article. If you woul dlike a copy of the previous content to work on a new draft let me know. --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wiki Maverique/Hagar Ben-Ari "Foxy H"

I, Wiki Maverique, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiki Maverique (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerked this to clean it up Hasteur (talk) 19:24, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Wiki Maverique: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asexual Awareness Week

I think I have sources to save the article. -Brianhe (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe:  Done to Draft:Asexual Awareness Week, though you'll be starting basically from scratch - it was a one-liner hardly worth restoring. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, it's just like you said. Well, next steps to be determined... at least I have some sources. — Brianhe (talk) 21:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Igor Radusinovic

He have played in Indonesia Super League, thus making him notable. Source here. -MbahGondrong (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master-at-Arms (United States Navy)

I, Taotaomona1977, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Taotaomona1977 (talk) 02:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The actual draft article page is at Draft:Master-at-Arms (United States Navy) and wasn't deleted. The title you referenced was justa request for guidance on the subject, but I have redirected it to the article now to avoid further confusion. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PROPERTY OF PROTOTYPE OF RAMSETU STONE

Sir, It is my first article and I write it with my heart with a new pace to solve the mystery of ramsetustone and it is my first article, I dont known wikipedia guidlines upto the mark -ARKAM HYATT (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @ARKAM HYATT: It looks like this was deleted because you were using your userpage as a blog or personal website. Userpages should really only contain content as it applies to you editing on Wikipedia and isn't a userpage akin to how you can create pages on social media sites and blogs. The content also looked like it was original research on your part, which also isn't allowed on Wikipedia. (WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:OR) Now don't feel bad about this- it's actually a pretty common mistake that people make on Wikipedia. We can e-mail you the content for you to post on your own blog or website, but it really can't be posted on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Statistical Implicative Analysis

I, Carcariass, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carcariass (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=655464176"