Wikipedia:Training/For students/Leave feedback
Training feedback Ansel.borhauer (talk)
- What I liked
The videos and the interactive training are great teaching tools.
- What I didn't like
I feel like there could be more activities for the training rather than a quick run through.
- What was missing
Explanation of the signature, I didn't think it just to be the tildes, I thought I had to write my name in.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing really, it all seemed appropriate.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great, Wish there was more.
--Ansel.borhauer (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Great videos explaining details, if you have basic HTML knowledge it ends up being managable
- What I didn't like
I wish there were more sections where you could test out how to use the information give
- What was missing
What i stated above for uploading photos
- What was unnecessary
What makes a good article
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was good, took some getting used to but overall it was very helpful.
--Jamesjohnson3 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the interactive part
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lozmeister (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Helped me get a better understanding of how wikipedia works behind the scenes
- What I didn't like
... Some common knowledge presented that was unnecessary
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... simple common things anyone with knowledge of wikipedia and writing skills should know
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I did not try it
--Scienceguy21 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the videos explaining and showing content.
- What I didn't like
... a lot of reading
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Psych2015 (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... the interactive part
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... more activities where we try each thing ourselves rather than just watch an informational video
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it was very useful
--Jjp73 (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The incorporation of videos throughout the tutorials.
- What I didn't like
I thought the interactive editing tutorial could be improved.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought the tutorial was short but to the point. It had some issues/bugs but it was still effective.
--Kkg123 (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The broad overview.
- What I didn't like
Maybe it could have been a little more specific.
- What was missing
More real examples of how to do things.
- What was unnecessary
The lecture on who other people on Wikipedia are.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Neat.
--Vrastall (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
I loved the interactive editing tutorials; they were very helpful. I liked the overall tutorial
--COV Western (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were very helpful and not too long
- What I didn't like
... Very wordy and sometimes hard to follow.
- What was missing
... Everything seemed to be covered.
- What was unnecessary
... All the words, visuals would be better, like pictures as well as the videos.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was hard to follow because sometimes they way you clicked the order of the buttons in the tutorial, it would take you out of the tutorial and then you couldn't get back into the tutorial unless you started over from the beginning.
--Katelynn.cox (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Very simple to navigate
...
- What I didn't like
- I got stuck on the citation part of the tutorial, after completing what it said to do it still did not work.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing i could tell, however this is new for me.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful I need hands on training so it was great
...
--Tgoodkey (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The information and videos were quite thoroughly beneficial. ...
- What I didn't like
... Nothing.
- What was missing
... Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I think it was very educational. Gave me a new view of Wikipedia.
--StanLeehen (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos were very helpful!
- What I didn't like
...The text, videos, and tutorials seemed a bit redundant... Maybe get rid of one of them.
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... As I said earlier, the three forms of portraying the same information was a bit redundant.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found it very helpful.
--Semaj311 (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Very helpful and straightforward. I liked that it gave links to find other resources without including an excessive amount of information in the training.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Deitkm (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The interactive editing tutorial and how straightforward the training was.
- What I didn't like
... Pressing X on the interactive sandbox tutorials caused the helpful hints to stop. popping up
- What was missing
... Nothing; all of the main components seemed to be there. The information presented seemed to be adequate enough for a beginner to understand the basics.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing; the tutorial was to the point.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I like it, but my concern was with exiting the hints. When pressing the arrow, the tutorial continues but when you click X it stops. It was hard to find my place in the tutorial afterwards and I felt a bit lost until I gave up and restarted it, realizing that I shouldn't press X. Besides that, I think the tutorial was helpful with my first user experience with Wikipedia.
--ChipsAndChopsticks (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...How comprehensive the training was!
- What I didn't like
...It was kind of difficult to navigate when the pages took me out of the training modules.
- What was missing
...nothing!
- What was unnecessary
...nothing!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...best part!
--Chandlerbuchanan (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The step by step tutorials.
...
- What I didn't like
- There was nothing that I did not like.
...
- What was missing
- I believe that there was nothing missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- There was nothing that I thought was unnecessary.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?I thought that it was very helpful rather than reading.
...
--Buchaly15 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- I liked the videos provided!--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What I didn't like
- too much text involved, maybe words should complement the videos--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What was missing
- someway to train and edit while completing the editorial--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- What was unnecessary
- The links taking me away from training--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Overall it helped me dramatically!--Luisq15 (talk) 21
- 26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
...
--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The interactive tutorials
- What I didn't like
The text instructions will probably be forgotten soon. I learned much more when having to edit using the tutorial than reading about editing.
- What was missing
More interactive tutorials would be great!
- What was unnecessary
-
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great. More of this would, rather than videos/text instruction would help.
--Btw777 (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
live interactive typing examples of editing, such as the user being able to type along with the tutorial to try some things
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Altb478 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
…easy to navigate
- What I didn't like
…when you clicked the links you couldn't get back to where you left off
- What was missing
…N/A
- What was unnecessary
…N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…I didn't know how to get back to page I was on without starting over
--Spidey1994 (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Simple, easy to follow
...
- What I didn't like
- Videos rely on java.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing really, serves the purpose of an intro
...
- What was unnecessary
- I didn't feel the videos added anything to the training, seemed a bit repetitive of the text.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try it.
...
--Veterinarydreams (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- it had some humor embedded in the instruction
...
- What I didn't like
- it was quiet lengthy, and it would not be possible to memorize everything on the spot anyways.
...
- What was missing
- I think it would be helpful to have a demo as the person actually works through for the first time.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? i liked it better than just reading about it. But based on size of your window, you are sometimes unable to click the links that you want to move on to the next step.
...
--Jukaredaa (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Othrowt (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Clear and Concise tutorial about how to Edit Wikipedia Articles, Also liked the interactive tutorials along the way giving a chance to practice making edits.
- What I didn't like
... Loved it all
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Really helpful feature, favorite part of the entire process.
--VarunS93 (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The tutorial was very simple and it really helped me see what goes into making articles and edits. ...
- What I didn't like
Sometimes the box that shows the progress was in the way of what I did so I could not see if it was correct. ...
- What was missing
I cannot think of anything ...
- What was unnecessary
Nothing ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was awesome ...
--Rgirar1 (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked the step-by-step tutorials in module 3
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Caitlinmcgrath (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I like because is very fun new things
- What I didn't like
...i really like all
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jangola27 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
…I like that each part of the training was well organized and concise. I thought the train gin was extremely in depth and well though out. Each step of editing was addressed.
- What I didn't like
…I did not like how long the train took. It took me about 2.5 hours to finish this and I don't remember a lot of what I learned because the process was so lengthy.
- What was missing
…I know it was training, but it was extremely morning and it took all my brain power to focus for only a few minutes.
- What was unnecessary
…The readings were uneasy when a video was posted that explained the exact same thing. i though the videos were the most helpful part of the process.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…The interactive tutorial was ok, I did not try it for very long but I though it was helpful in understanding the editing process.
--LLP210 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The training was engaging and I did not get bored.
- What I didn't like
It was hard to find the training.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
well thought out and good
--Tmartin3576 (talk) 07:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The videos helped give a visual example to the process of code.
- What I didn't like
Nothing
- What was missing
Maybe more examples of how to use the code
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was good for practicing how to do everything.
--MeganMcIlvenna (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--LiRuiQing (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Xiaoxuxu0313 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- very informative
...
- What I didn't like
- The interactive editing tool had an X button that blocked words, and was annoying at times
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--ArjunChawla175 (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
This training was very informative and helped lay out the specifics in creating your on wiki page.
- What I didn't like
Some things were still a little difficult to understand, such as citations and how to include pictures with the correct format, however, I know we will be discussing more and more of these topics in class and with a librarian so I feel as though I will understand more of what is expected after doing so.
- What was missing
I didn't feel as though anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
Everything in this training was necessary and was definitely needed in order to make a successful wiki page.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not try the interactive editing tutorial, but based off what it said it is going to be useful to have and getting other peoples opinions and feedback on things is what will help you become a better writer. Just remember to not take anything personally because it is all for our benefit.
--Kcabral18 (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos and the helpful modules where you were actually using the programs helped a lot
- What I didn't like
... Some of the information seemed redundant or repeated
- What was missing
... Not Much
- What was unnecessary
... Repeated information
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Friggin awesome --AGSPianoMan (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
very informative, especially the editing
- What I didn't like
It doesn't say where the information can be accessed in the future.
- What was missing
Nothing, it was thorough
- What was unnecessary
Definitely, and helpful.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful
--Enthusiast006 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--X-pert Dreamer (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- the videos were clear
...
- What I didn't like
- I find coding difficult
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It helped me understanding
...
--GiuliaBalsamo (talk) 20:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Easy and quick to work through
...
- What I didn't like
- Lack of videos
...
- What was missing
- More videos
...
- What was unnecessary
- Too much information about the community
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a
...
--MariaCabrera23 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Detailed explanation on every point. Well organized helpful information.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SlavicaZ3 (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
All of the useful information
- What I didn't like
I would like the option to advance to the next page with keyboard shortcuts
- What was missing
Nothing!!
- What was unnecessary
Nothing!!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very Helpful! --KTB123english (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Very concise and relevant. Videos were short and very helpful.
- What I didn't like
Some of the instructions had grammatical errors.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very useful to actually do the editing rather than just read about it.
--Zchen373 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bellre (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The interactive portion and the videos.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like all the information that did not include interactive portions.
- What was missing
I can't think of anything that was missing.
- What was unnecessary
Learning communication skills to use when talking with others on Wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I think it was very helpful.
Training feedback
- What I liked
Very interactive.
- What I didn't like
Overly extensive.
- What was missing
no
- What was unnecessary
The advanced editing section
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
useful
--Wiggins jake (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
Very informative, and had lots of helpful videos
- What I didn't like
...
Constant reiteration of the same things
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ehylemon (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The interactive editing training.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some aspects could have been a little more thorough.
...
- What was missing
- A handout displaying each step of the editing process.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The videos.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were very helpful
...
--Krb45698 (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...There was detailed step by step instructions to follow which made it easier to practice. I also enjoyed actually submitting editing which will help me when I embark on the wiki page project.
- What I didn't like
... There were lots of clips through the tutorial which I was unable to listen to due to being in a classroom with other students. This could have been disruptive to others. If I had known in advance I could have brought some headphones.
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I have enjoyed the tutorial as it gives me the hands on experience of editing the page and attempting other tasks relevant to the use of wikipedia.
--Victoria Mealor (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I liked how thorough the training was and how helpful all the tips are.
- What I didn't like
... My videos not working.
- What was missing
... Maybe more pictures rather than videos.
- What was unnecessary
... The confusing graphs and charts.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought it was great and incredibly helpful.
--Laurendiaz (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- it was very informative a lot information liked the links and practice in the sandbox
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- the java links
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked them they worked very well and were very straight forward and helpful
...
--RERoyal (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The amount of information.
- What I didn't like
... The amount of information.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Oklamert (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Informative and helpful with most sections that included a video tutorial
- What I didn't like
...The structure of bracketing, coding and reference points, but I guess that will come with time and repetition. The coding seems overwhelming at first.
- What was missing
...Perhaps a few more tutorial videos and some try it out and apply examples.
- What was unnecessary
...All necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was very helpful. I would of liked to seen more for all parts of training.
--Djac88 (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The tutorial is pretty thorough and answered a lot of my initial questions.
- What I didn't like
There is a lot of information, which means I will have to look up a lot of this information again in the future.
- What was missing
I can't think of anything that was missing.
- What was unnecessary
I thought the "advanced" section was misnamed, not unnecessary. The advanced section was more along the lines of random bits of information. The only thing that felt advanced was the "Adding images and other media" slide.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked the interactive editing tutorial, it allowed me to test my knowledge and make sure I understood what was explained.
--Jessemcmanus (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...The training was short and relatively simple.
- What I didn't like
...The videos were full of fluff
- What was missing
...More simple practice tutorials
- What was unnecessary
...The length of some of the videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Trevorcallarman (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked the videos because they showed how to do things on the pages themselves.
- What I didn't like
...The descriptions of how to use the different codes were confusing.
- What was missing
...I think everything was covered or there was a link to how to learn more about whatever was missing.
- What was unnecessary
...I think everything was necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KMFischer (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I liked how the directions were very precise. ...
- What I didn't like
...I often thought it was complicated.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Everything was important.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was pretty difficult.
--Jaimev10 (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Specific information and structure.
- What I didn't like
...The video need to download (probably my own problem).
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Axingmayra (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The review process is great.
...
- What I didn't like
...There is lot to learn
- What was missing
... more video and less issues streaming through my computer. I review the video on-line using you tube.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... there were good
--AbeBasicUnit12358 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Videos
- What I didn't like
length
- What was missing
a single video explaining all of it
- What was unnecessary
editing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
good, but needed more videos
--Yuskhawas (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked how it was set up into four modules. It made it easier to comprehend.
- What I didn't like
... It was a bit long, but I know it was necessary.
- What was missing
...I haven't ran across anything just yet.
- What was unnecessary
...Everything seemed pretty relevant.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It worked well and really helped me! The only issue I had with it was that if I wanted to go back and edit it I couldn't move forward through the training afterwards and it took me a while to get back to where I left off.
--Agray5 (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Step by step directions
...
- What I didn't like
- leaving page for videos
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Yes
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ryanbeddes (talk) 07:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
everything!
- What I didn't like
nothing!
- What was missing
nothing, very informative!
- What was unnecessary
nothing!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not try it
--KTB123COD (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Very thorough and easy to understand! The interactive helped me a lot and the videos were great too.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rlira123 (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...The casual tone of the text
- What I didn't like
...Nothing!
- What was missing
...Maybe add some more graphics
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was useful, but it was tough to navigate back to the page I was originally on.
--Tartancircus (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Straight forward. Easy to understand. Very thorough
- What I didn't like
Should be a timer on each page ensuring each page has been completed
- What was missing
a timer
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Stephalkidis (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Video tutorials
- What I didn't like
repetition
- What was missing
Content was sufficient.
- What was unnecessary
Repetition
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The tutorial helped me understand.
--Sean.Chris95 (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...the interactive links
- What I didn't like
...the long explanations
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...worked very well and was useful
--ZarathustraSay20 (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)ZarathustraSay20
Training feedback
- What I liked
...The tutorial was very informative for how to edit a wikipedia article.
- What I didn't like
...The tutorial was very wordy at times and there was some irrelevant information that just made the tutorial longer.
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...some parts were boring and unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It helped a lot with learning how to use wikipedia. --Cstauch1 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Texidor94 (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...the videos were convenient.
- What I didn't like
...Some of the slides were redundant.
- What was missing
...more help for people who don't quite understand codes for adding pictures and other media.
- What was unnecessary
...I don't think any was completely unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not try it.
--AnthCulturee (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The videos were used well.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--EncycloMan2 (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Sandbox section was new to me. Also, the information about VisualEditor was great. (Loving VisualEditor very much.) Nice videos made by users!
- What I didn't like
The tutorial assumed I was a beginner. It would have been nice if some script at the beginning parsed my username to "intelligently" provide me a tutorial tailored to my likely ignorance based on my contributions.
- What was missing
An example of an editorial disagreement that was amicably resolved using Talk among users.
- What was unnecessary
I only needed a small fraction of the tutorial.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was great except that I kept getting interrupted by the message that I am not a recognized, verified contributor to Wikipedia. Then, when I pursued this latter message, the editing tutorial messages followed onto the pages for getting recognized.
--Mavaddat (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
It was concise and efficient. The interactive tutorials had no bugs and were quite helpful and informative. The specialized section at the end for editing medical articles was especially helpful.
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
See above.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful and complete.
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Is how detailed the Training was.
- What I didn't like
...Is that I had some computer issues with some of the videos and so I had to skip some of them.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KJames94 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The videos and descriptions were easy to follow and very informative.
- What I didn't like
...The training was rather long and somewhat repetitive.
- What was missing
...Nothing, I found it very comprehensive (perhaps a bit TOO much...).
- What was unnecessary
...I feel like the plagiarism details were self-explanatory.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--ExpressElevatortoHell (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I liked the fact that the tutorial was done with in a timely matter.
- What I didn't like
... I felt like I could've used a little more information on the articles that I'd be editing.
- What was missing
... A little more information about the content that I'm to edit.
- What was unnecessary
... No Comment.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I found the tutorial extremely helpful, and useful. I now know how some of the tools work. --Cassidypj (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
Nothing was missing, everything was great. ...
- What was unnecessary
In my opinion, everything was perfectly explained. Everything was necessary. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Shirley Jusino (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC) The process of getting the certificate is quite complicated.Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The tutorials and the videos really showed how to do everything and the explanations explained why.
- What I didn't like
The videos were slow.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
There was a lot of common sense about how to interact with other people on the site.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It's very helpful
--Christinabillias (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...It is an in-depth and informative training.
- What I didn't like
...It could have been simplified a little and took a long time to complete.
- What was missing
...I don't think it was missing anything.
- What was unnecessary
...The length of the modules may have been to long.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful in explaining how to use the editing tools.
--Rkuklok (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)rkuklok
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I enjoyed the thoroughness of the training and the information that it gave me.
- What I didn't like
... There wasn't anything I didn't enjoy.
- What was missing
... I think I got all the basics form the training.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing, it is all important for using wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I did not try. --Rmosiervt (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Most of it
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...A description of how to set up different sandboxes, and links to them, right after first introducing sandboxes. As a new user, I appreciate the more_markup sandbox as a training and reference, and wanted to be able to set up a link to it right away. I figured out how to do that, but not through the tutorial.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Good, except it didn't allow you to go return to a step if you accidentally skipped it. Had to finish then start over and click thru to the step I missed.
--Radeachar (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...simple, clean, informative: written words accompanying spoken video
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... helpful
--Hotgardener (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mmcluckie (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- clear wording and easy to understand
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sspen138 (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... clear, simple
- What I didn't like
...boring, especially the videos which are dull and painfully slow-paced
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...how to give wikilove. general slow pace
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...n/a
--Mcelroys (talk) 04:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Hay weyer (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Good videos
- What I didn't like
...Bad interactive aspect
- What was missing
...Easier interactive process
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was confusing and hard to do because the tutorial didnt show how to do the requested actions very well.
--Amohamed2526 (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...videos inserted broke up tedium
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I got stuck a couple of times for various reasons. Clicking the X at the top of the dialog box seemed to stop the interactive tutorial rather than just close the box.
--MsTCason (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- I liked that wikipedia requires people to shows both sides of any claim in an article instead of giving one opinion.
...
- What I didn't like
- That any one can edit a source without having any education or experties in a subject
...
- What was missing
...It would nice to have more information in rules for copyright.
- What was unnecessary
... The information was to basic in the orientation.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was a good source to obtain information.
--EDgan7 (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I appreciated the relative brevity of the training.
- What I didn't like
... I do not think most people will be able to absorb that amount of basic coding in one training session, that may require additional training or editing controls.
- What was missing
... Possibly a downloadable formatting/coding reference.
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I enjoyed the fact that the program follows your progress and gives you the ability to make mistakes and try again.
--Anationmaritime (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked everything. Especially the videos that were included.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kimfrancissalles (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Everything was straight forward and helpful.
- What I didn't like
It took a long time.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful to fully understand how to do things.
--Carolynnt (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I thought everything was explained very well.
- What I didn't like
...The website is very confusing with a lot of "ins and outs".
- What was missing
...I thought there should have been more tutorial videos. Those helped me out the most.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the "slides" were a little too wordy and hard to follow
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I loved it! It helped me tremendouslyMet2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
--Met2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--CMATSGB (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The simplified text and videos, that helped get me through this.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Theresa L Gregory (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The training was descriptive and helpful. I really enjoyed the tutorials in the editing section
- What I didn't like
Sometimes the descriptions were a little wordy
- What was missing
Certain criteria that get an article deleted
- What was unnecessary
I found everything necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Again, I found it very helpful but could use some more direction
--Elly7677 (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Tutorial covered a range of topics and videos helped make explanations clearer
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
Was pretty comprehensive, and can't think of anything in particular that I disliked or still need to know
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Editing tutorial was probably the most helpful part. It gave me a chance to practice useful wikicode and actively learn the ropes.
--Meganhumburg (talk) 03:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
It was straight and to the point
- What I didn't like
There was a lot of technical things that were hard to grasp
- What was missing
Maybe a tad more pictures and diagrams
- What was unnecessary
The videos that didn't work
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
n/a
--Indyaudri (talk) 04:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback from Communist-party-van
- What I liked
I appreciated how academic the introduction was. Frankly, it was a bit surprising to see such a collegiate course-type module on the site. It reminded me of some of the less-than-thrilling alcohol education modules we have to take, but instead of being a bore, it was kind of fun to receive one from Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--[communist party van] (talk) 07:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...All of the steps were clearly described, to the point, and were separated into easily digestible portions.
- What I didn't like
...The audio on some of the videos was of poor quality.
- What was missing
...I think everything was covered pretty well.
- What was unnecessary
...It was short enough, no need to cut stuff out.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...As expected, not bad, not great.
--DWBCoding (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--AlphaMaleMcBrowski (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Interactive editing tutorial, Videos.
- What I didn't like
Module 3 is slightly long.
- What was missing
Better links within the interactive editing tutorial, as it is still rather glitchy.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Useful as it allows us to practise what we have just learnt.
--ABonheur (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- great descriptions
...
- What I didn't like
- hard to return to sections
...
- What was missing
- would have liked more pictures
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Pskellerstudent (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
*The interactive editing tutorial, the simplicity of the way it was written.
- What I didn't like
*N/A
- What was missing
*There should be more interactive editing tutorials.An easier to read and understand list of wikicodes would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
*N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
*IT WAS GREAT!
--ZulaikhaN (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Very thorough and user friendly experience.
- What I didn't like
Navigation back to training page is hard.
- What was missing
Maybe a final 'project' at the end requiring the user to edit an article with requirements would be good.
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The step by step approach was useful and easy to understand.
--Kua Wei Qi Wendy (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Great interactive tutorials that really helped in the process of learning wiki code.
...
- What I didn't like
- Videos didn't play properly on Safari.
...
- What was missing
- NA
...
- What was unnecessary
- NA
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was my favorite part!
...
--Hai jatai (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The training was straightforward, and I really liked the guided practice for editing.
- What I didn't like
A lot of it felt redundant, because it felt like common sense when it was said the first time, and then you had me watch a video about it, and I started to feel like it was wasting my time.
- What was missing
I can't think of anything that was missing, but I think it would be nice if you could have a guided editing practice that you could go back to even after the training was finished and that you could keep going back to if you want to practice certain things, just so you can practice and check your work.
- What was unnecessary
The "edit" video that was about the edit button seemed a little pointless. If I'm taking this training, I'm probably already interested in editing a page, so adding a little promo for editing seemed excessive.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
This was the best part of the module, in my opinion. Because I am already familiar with academic writing, plagiarism, and common courtesy, a lot of this training seemed like common sense, to me, but the editing tutorial was really helpful and gave me a lot of confidence that I could figure out how to edit an article, if I want to.
--SKPsych237 (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Interactive tutorials and short videos
- What I didn't like
...Not enough hands on
- What was missing
...Pictures
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It provides a first hand guided assistance. Allowing us to be familiarised with the steps to editing
--StevenZHMH (talk) 07:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I liked the videos, they were short but very informative.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very easy to use and very helpful
--Matthews8978 (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
What I didn't like is that some of the information seemed repetitive at times.
- What was missing
There was nothing missing from this training module.
- What was unnecessary
There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.
--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
I did not the length of this training module. I feel like I will not remember a lot of what was being taught.
- What was missing
There was nothing missing from this training module.
- What was unnecessary
There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.
--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- You made it easy for a beginner to understand and follow easily.
...
- What I didn't like
- There was a lot. However, because you made it easy to follow and easy to navigate through the training program, that made it easier to digest and remember.
...
- What was missing
- No idea. I am a newbie.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The repeating was a little... repetitive, but I understand the need for it.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Not bad. Made the digestion of all the information a bit easier.
...
--Owenspg (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- The step by step instruction was easy to follow. I liked the links to the video content as well.
...
- What I didn't like
- The training takes quite a bit of time and is quite in depth. There's a lot to learn and to remember. I was hoing for a "quick start" type of guide, but maybe that's not realistic.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- The "edit tab" youtube video was fun, but perhaps not necessary.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked the tutorials, though I didn't navigate the first one correctly.
...
--Archie0401 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Chrislid49 (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I really liked the sandbox tutorials
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
some of the short videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
super helpful, wish there were more even
--RoseKorn (talk) 16:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
I liked the interactive editing sessions.
- What I didn't like
There was a lot to learn, still is, but there is no way to work around it.
- What was missing
More interactive tutorials would be nice.
- What was unnecessary
It was all good information.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorials were the most helpful part of this orientation. I was very pleased to get the guidance of the tutorial.
--TheRondanimal (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Easy to follow, and super informative.
- What I didn't like
A lot of information at once. Afraid I'll forget it all.
- What was missing
More practice.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
N/A
--TexanBackpacker (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- I really like the videos, they helped me out a lot.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some information was confusing like the steps of bold.
...
- What was missing
- More in depth information or even examples.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Some was pretty confusing and one helped me out.
...
--Celena21 (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... Videos
- What I didn't like
... Length
- What was missing
...Pictures/graphics
- What was unnecessary
...making a profile
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Loved it, wish it could all be like that
--Breezyshore (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
Everything - training really helpfully acquainted me w/ the basics, and gave me enough links to seek out more advanced info. I wish I had this when I started wanting to edit in the past!
- What I didn't like
n/a
- What was missing
I don't know yet! Maybe there's some weird wiki magic I am unaware of? I know most of what to do that I think I need to do.
I'm still a bit confused about how to select specific pictures from wiki commons when adding them to an article (where to get the filename for the first section of the template).
- What was unnecessary
n/a
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was super helpful! I feel a lot more confident about my knowledge now, and have a bunch of sandbox pages to look at if I forget anything.
--LookOnMyEditsYeMighty (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... It was very positive and thorough
- What I didn't like
... The images to help check if we had formatted our page right were misaligned
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Loved it! --Emmaeadwyer (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked that it offered video help in case that was something you're interested in
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...N/A
--Clpgator (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
The videos were short but covered all of the necessary material.
- What I didn't like
The codes seem as though they will be somewhat difficult for those without coding knowledge to learn.
- What was missing
Nothing comes to mind.
- What was unnecessary
Explaining how to make words bold seems rather self-explanatory when there's a button on the edit page for it.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was fairly helpful, though it disappeared at one point and I couldn't find it again.
--Mattwithoutabat (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...I liked how it went into great detail about everything, and that it was easy to follow and understand.
- What I didn't like
... It was way too long in my opinion
- What was missing
... I didn't think anything was really missing
- What was unnecessary
... the beginning of every section.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I didn't do it
--KENNYTHEMANAGER (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
What was missing
... How do I use the Talk page on my user toolbar? The tutorial explains talk pages in articles, but it looks like I have my own. Is this just a log of my activity? or is it a comment section?
--RocketSams (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- I liked the abundance of material and the style in which
it was presented. ...
- What I didn't like
- There were a couple of technical glitches.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing of importance.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I found it all relevant and encouraging.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?...
The tutorial was an etremely useful tool.Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
--Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...Loved the interactive tutorials!
- What I didn't like
...I noticed that for some codes it would help to write to remember putting a space between # and item 1 for example
- What was missing
...I would have liked an example of what an edit summary should include
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I loved it. Made things easy and learning fun!
--Linjess (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... I found the fact that we could make edits to practice very useful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was really helpful with the right alerts and prompts to guide a first time user. --Sm1986 (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
- Friendly instructions that were thorough without bogging down the reader.
...
- What I didn't like
- Module 3 was a little long.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Perhaps the division between medical and other edits.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try.
...
--Shangguthrie (talk) 02:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
...It was easy!
- What I didn't like
...The interactive training made it less daunting.
- What was missing
...Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It worked and it was very helpful!
--Oshinrai19 (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Training feedback
- What I liked
... The whole thing was very easy to follow along with, and presented just enough information to the point where I didn't feel overwhelmed.
- What I didn't like
... I had no issues with this training module. There was a nice balance between information presented in both text and video form.
- What was missing
... Nothing that I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Works just as they showed in the tutorial videos. --Blue.goggles (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)