Talk:Anti-fat bias

Discrimination NA‑class Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[untitled section]

Removed disease from obese description as is it not an abnormal effect. It is completely normal given bad nutrition and poor living habits.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.199.48 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 27 November 2010‎ (UTC)[reply]

removed an opnion

Whether we need to develop programs to reduce anti-fat bias or not is a matter of opinion. If that opinion needs to be expressed, it should be reworded "These (named and cited) people believe that programs need to be developed ..." Peboki (talk) 18:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umm. . .

I am suggested that this page be merged with [[1]].69.250.147.209 (talk) 05:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)stealstrash[reply]

Merging

If one does decide to attempt to merge a page into another again please remember to actually merge and not just redirect. That is a great way to lose a ton of information.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 23:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Weightism

Seems that both terms refer to stigma against larger people. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this idea. Anti-fat bias shouldn't have its own article, and there is no 'anti-thin bias' article. Therefore I think the anti-fat bias article should be merged with this article, but I also believe this article requires a lot more work done on it; namely dividing the bias against overweight people and the bias against underweight people. Elspamo4 (talk) 20:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge - these overlap +++ Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge - Different names, same thing. Meclee (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge - Agreed. I mean with sexism, it has pages on both types of sexism but I don't see the need for an "anti-thin bias" so yeah. Jackninja5 (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not 100% sure that I'd say "merge" as the weightism article reads 100% as an advocacy editorial and not one single thing is sourced. 68.227.167.123 (talk) 08:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]