Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacKeeper
- MacKeeper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete - This article contains some content that is written totally like an advertisement. Even though when people searches about MacKeeper they find a Wikipedia page about product, which create an good impact and anybody can be influenced to download the software/app. But no body should actually download it, as discussed and stated by biggest platforms, such as - iMore[1], etc. Preeti Sharma's Knowledge (talk) 09:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Theroadislong (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep This is an absolutely frivolous request. The subject is notable and is cited.--Labattblueboy (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
" Keep. Not only because I use it myself, but also because it is a Notable product as witnessed by all the Web articles about it. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Notable for a standalone article as per WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT, many reviews - see article. Also, see WP:ATD - editing is almost always preferable to deletion or stubification. Esquivalience t 15:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- keep how can you nominate it?C E (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - as above, extensively referenced, clearly notable software. Misguided nomination.Dialectric (talk) 02:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)