User talk:IronGargoyle/Archive 18

Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Edit on page 'Christadelphians'

Hi I'm enquiring about your recent edit on this aforementioned page specifically your revert in the introduction. This material, although sourced, was removed due to it being inappropriate for the introduction of this article as it is discussed later in a more appropriate section. A section in the talk page on this has now been started highlighting the issues of the content you reverted. Would you be able to constructively engage in this discussion on the talk page in this section now that you have republished this material? Many thanks Lintonna (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit on 4 May 2015

Sorry, I was trying to remove vandalism of a biography of a living person. Sorry for not leaving a summary. I'm not trying to cause any trouble. (Man, I am messing up.)--Magnus Puer (sermo) 22:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries can be helpful. I'm not entirely clear how removing the subject's entire sourced professional record amounts to removing vandalism though. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit on 4 May 2015

I made that edit precisely because IT was not neutral. Did you look at the comment I left along with my change? If you seek neutrality, then you have to welcome the opinion on wiki of EVERY person who disagrees with the film (wouldn't that be tiresome and pointless). I have no problem with people having a political difference with a film, but I do not believe that this one was A. founded in reality, or B. unbiased. The section was not neutral and was representing a trivial disagreement made by politicized parties who do not wish to see ANY slight upon their opinions or people. If you accept that section, you must just as well accept the cries of people who claim The Avengers is anti-Scandinavian, or Independence Day promotes anti-immigration policies (those are stretches to make my point). There has to be a standard of quality and/or level of relevance to make edits to wiki articles. I do not believe the comments from a small group of pro-Israel lobbyists (I am very supportive of Israel, this is not a religious or political thing for me) meets the criteria for objective or relevant/important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.111.74 (talk) 02:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

The criticism section was sourced to reliable sources. The tone of the article didn't endorse that criticism, it simply stated that the criticism was there. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place.

Hidudeimawesome (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! IronGargoyle (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for protecting the Lost Saga Wikipedia page against vandalism. Many thanks! MontgomeryDalton (talk) 01:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! IronGargoyle (talk) 13:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit on 8 May 2015

I'm really sorry I removed the Gatwick-Reno/Tahoe service as it has been scrapped due to problems with the facilities at Reno Airport. No one has ever queried my editing before so I did not realise I had to provide a source when removing something. I'm glad you pointed it out though! I do a lot of editing on airport pages to give up to date passenger statistics (Luton, Manchester, Edinburgh) and add new air routes that have been announced (sorry, bit of self-promo!). I would be more than happy if you could point out mistakes that I might make in the future to make my editing better. Thanks, Rhys

I have added the link in the edit summary but here it is anyway: http://www.rgj.com/story/money/business/2015/05/07/nonstop-flights-reno-london-scrapped/70932738/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by AviationRhys (talk • contribs) 16:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hey sorry for vandalizing

I´m just in school and i though it woud be funny PEACE