Talk:Miri/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Muffin Wizard (talk · contribs) 06:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article, not too long and not too short. I have done some more improvements on it and I think I want to review it as soon as possible (probably at the midnight as I want to give some rest to my computer now). :) ~ Muffin Wizard^;) 06:39, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking this review :-) Cerevisae (talk) 07:33, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After a thorough check on the article, I suggested:

Added some more citation on the first paragraph of "recent developments" section.
Expand the demography lead and languages section.

Cheers! :) ~ Muffin Wizard^;) 10:39, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·